iter it.3 BLOCKED: surfaced fundamental milestone-design fork (bounce-back)

it.3 Task 1 (non-destructive oracle + spec-delegated class-(b)
sweep) ran complete; zero production code changed. The mandated
sweep surfaced that 6 corpus fixtures contain
build(d:Int)=if d==0 then Leaf else Node(1,build(d-1),build(d-1)) —
a terminating, maximally-LLM-natural, non-structural non-tail
BRANCHING recursion the milestone's totality dichotomy makes
inexpressible (not ADT-structural; not recur-able — branching is
not a single tail back-edge). The milestone as-specified would
fail its own feature-acceptance criterion. Orchestrator correctly
bounced rather than patch a 4th time (spec_over_plan_patches).
Records the blocked attempt + the reusable bench/it3-oracle/
(40-fixture behavioural oracle, valid for the post-decision
re-dispatch). main forward-only; nothing reverted. Resolution
(it.2b + a user purity-pillar decision) tracked in the roadmap.
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-15 16:06:42 +02:00
parent c992eb93df
commit 305ffd1367
44 changed files with 2346 additions and 0 deletions
+1
View File
@@ -77,3 +77,4 @@
- 2026-05-15 — bugfix mut-diag-double-code: fieldtest F2 — the four mut-local `CheckError` variants embedded `[<code>]` in their `#[error]` Display body while the non-JSON CLI formatter also prepends `[code]`, doubling it in human stderr; dropped the embedded prefix from the four strings, bringing them in line with all non-mut variants; RED-first via `debug` (`ct1_check_cli.rs::check_human_mode_renders_mut_diagnostic_code_exactly_once`), GREEN applied inline as a trivial mechanical edit; tests 598 → 599 → 2026-05-15-bugfix-mut-diag-double-code.md
- 2026-05-15 — iter it.1: iteration-discipline milestone (1 of 3) — `Term::Loop` / `Term::Recur` / `LoopBinder` added as strictly-additive first-class AST nodes end-to-end: Form-A `parse_loop`/`parse_recur` + print + prose render/free-var/subst lockstep + canonical-JSON serde/round-trip + schema/spec-drift/schema-coverage/carve-out lockstep (13→17) + typecheck (binder typing + recur arity/type unification via `loop_stack: &mut Vec<Vec<Type>>` threaded exactly as mut.2's `mut_scope_stack`; recur-tail-position via a new private `verify_loop_body`, `verify_tail_positions` public signature unchanged) + codegen (loop-header block, one phi per binder, recur back-edge `br` with a NEW parallel `block_terminated` setter, lambda-boundary `loop_frames` save/restore mirroring mut.3). Four new `CheckError` variants `Recur{OutsideLoop,ArityMismatch,TypeMismatch,NotInTailPosition}` (bracket-`[code]`-free Display per the F2 convention). Strictly additive verified — zero deletions touch `tail-app`/`tail-do`, `verify_tail_positions`' tail-app role, or the seven existing codegen `block_terminated` sites (the 32 within-iter deletions are exclusively DD-3 stub-then-fill replacements). `Term::Recur` synth returns a fresh metavar (resolves the plan's flagged `Type::unit()` open risk: recur appears in `if` branches that must unify with the sibling type). `loop_counter.ail``55`, `loop_in_lambda_e2e.ail``49`, four negatives fire exact codes, `tail-app` fixtures byte-identical, zero IR/prose snapshot drift; `cargo test --workspace` green. Two mut.1-class plan-pseudo-vs-reality substitutions recorded (prose round-trip asserting AST-equality is impossible — no Form-B parser by design; the diagnostic.rs doc-list premise was false) → 2026-05-15-iter-it.1.md
- 2026-05-15 — iter it.2: iteration-discipline milestone (2 of 3) — structural-recursion guardedness checker + first real `Diverge` effect, strictly additive (nothing `tail`-related removed; that is it.3). New whole-body pass `verify_structural_recursion` runs as a sibling of `verify_tail_positions` in `check_fn`'s post-synth region (DD-1): the `smaller`-set algorithm with implicit candidate-position inference + unconstrained accumulator positions (DD-2 — foldl-shape accumulator classifies as structural recursion, pure+total), self/mutual identification with an inline ADT-family connected-components union-find (DD-3), and the it.2-only `tail==false` grandfather. `CheckError::NonStructuralRecursion {callee,arg}` (bracket-`[code]`-free Display per F2). `term_contains_loop` (stops at `Term::Lam` boundaries, DD-4) injects `"Diverge"` into the raised effect set so the existing `UndeclaredEffect` machinery enforces it with no new diagnostic variant; lam-arrow + `Term::LetRec` sub-effect sites wired (loop behind a lam edge carries `!Diverge` on the lam's arrow, propagating via the free callee-effect path, not leaking to the enclosing fn — exactly as `!IO` scopes). DESIGN.md Decision 3 + §Data-model hook synced present-tense. Four it.1 loop fixtures gained `!Diverge`. Two spec-premise boundary defects surfaced and resolved inside the task's invariants (corpus clean, check not weakened): (§1) the spec's "21 tail-app fixtures" grandfather premise under-counts the corpus — no-ADT-candidate counter recursions (~18, e.g. `build_tree(depth:Int)`) have no structural position to verify and are deferred to it.3 migration; (§2) two RC-regression fixtures (`rc_pin_recurse_implicit`, `rc_let_alias_implicit_param`) hold an ADT param constant while decrementing an Int — genuinely non-structural, joined the spec's transitional `tail-app` grandfather exactly as the other 20 corpus fixtures do (their RC==GC regression guards verified still green; the regression lives in the unchanged `pin`/`pin_aliased` bodies). Both recorded as corrected it.3 corpus-migration scope. `cargo test --workspace` 622 green / 0 red; all 9 acceptance pins non-vacuous (negatives `.contains(code)`); struct_rec_sum→15, loop_needs_diverge→55, the it.1 55/49 e2e still green → 2026-05-15-iter-it.2.md
- 2026-05-15 — iter it.3 (BLOCKED, bounce-back): destructive terminal iteration of iteration-discipline. Task 1 (non-destructive: pre-migration oracle + the spec-delegated class-(b) live sweep) ran complete — 40 recursive corpus fixtures classified + oracled under `bench/it3-oracle/`; zero production code changed; HEAD clean at c992eb9. The mandated Task-1.3 sweep surfaced a **fundamental milestone-design flaw**, not a migration nuisance: 6 fixtures contain `build(d: Int) = if d==0 then Leaf else Node(1, build(d-1), build(d-1))` — a terminating, maximally-LLM-natural, **non-structural (Int param, no ADT-candidate) non-tail BRANCHING (double) recursion** that the milestone's totality dichotomy ("structural-over-ADT OR loop/recur, else error") makes **inexpressible**: not ADT-structural, and not `recur`-able (branching ≠ single tail back-edge). Post-it.3 it is a hard `NonStructuralRecursion` with no expressible alternative — the milestone as-specified would fail its own feature-acceptance criterion (clause 1: the LLM reaches for `build(d-1),build(d-1)`; clause 2: the milestone would *remove* expressivity). The orchestrator correctly refused a 4th plan-patch and bounced (`feedback_spec_over_plan_patches`). Boss verdict: the totality story overlooked a second canonical total-by-construction scheme — well-founded recursion on a strictly-decreasing non-negative Int measure. Resolution requires a new additive iteration **it.2b** (widen the it.2 guardedness checker to accept Int-bounded recursion incl. branching) BEFORE it.3 re-dispatches; the purity sub-fork (Int≠Nat: total only for non-negative entry) touches the user-co-designed purity pillar → user design decision, recommended option A1 (accept with a documented non-negative-entry obligation, analogous to array-bounds). Notify sent; loop stopped. The RC-RSS/18g.1 load-bearing risk (it.3 Task 5.5/5b) was NOT reached and must NOT be treated as resolved by the milestone-close audit → 2026-05-15-iter-it.3.md