workflow: replace docs/roadmap.md with Gitea issue backlog
The forward queue moves out of the in-tree markdown file and into Gitea issues at http://192.168.178.103:3000/Brummel/AILang/issues. Labels: kind:{milestone,feature,todo,idea} + prio:{p1,p2,p3} + state:in-progress. Big chunks live as Gitea milestones (containers) with full prose in the description; smaller items are standalone issues. Browse-and-filter scales constant against growing item count; the previous markdown file was 1059 lines, of which ~850 were already-closed-entry verlauf (the same failure class the JOURNAL cut removed). Sync-drift Code<>Tracker mitigation: Soft-convention `closes #N` / `refs #N` in commit bodies — Gitea auto-closes the issue on push. Captured in user-level CLAUDE.md (~/.claude/CLAUDE.md, not in this commit) as the durable rule; no hook enforcement. In-repo changes: - docs/roadmap.md deleted. - CLAUDE.md (project): Code-layout drops roadmap; /boss gating retargeted; Roles section rewritten with a new "Gitea issues" bullet (URL + tea-CLI snippet) and the closes-#N trailer note. - skills/boss/SKILL.md: 10 sites retargeted, plus Step 1 now prescribes `tea issues ls --labels prio:p1` as the queue read. - skills/brainstorm/SKILL.md: Step 7.5 no-override BLOCK now files a Gitea issue via `tea issues create` instead of appending a roadmap entry; spec deletion stays. - skills/audit/SKILL.md + ailang-architect.md: deferral requirement and debt-heuristic retargeted; forward-intent belongs in the Gitea backlog. - skills/fieldtest/SKILL.md, skills/docwriter/SKILL.md + ailang-docwriter.md: roadmap → backlog. - design/contracts/honesty-rule.md: forward intent lives in the Gitea backlog (pinned phrases unchanged). - design/INDEX.md: Docs bullet drops roadmap, adds the backlog URL. - crates/ailang-core/tests/docs_honesty_pin.rs: two assert messages retargeted (assertion bodies unchanged). - bench/architect_sweeps.sh: Sweep-4 TABU extended with `docs/roadmap\.md` so the deleted path cannot quietly regrow as a cross-reference in design/contracts/. Verification: - cargo build --workspace clean. - cargo test --workspace: 647 passed, 0 failed, 2 ignored. - bench/architect_sweeps.sh exit 0 (all five sweeps clean, incl. new TABU). - grep over the live tree (excluding docs/specs/, docs/plans/) shows zero residual docs/roadmap.md refs. Not touched: ~55 historical files under docs/specs/ and docs/plans/ that mention docs/roadmap.md. Snapshot-character, analogous to the JOURNAL-cut precedent — historical specs are not mass-edited just because a live file was retired; their mentions were correct at write time.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Trigger conditions are any of:
|
||||
|
||||
- `cargo doc --no-deps 2>&1` shows accumulated warnings across
|
||||
multiple crates after a stability window of several milestones.
|
||||
- A roadmap entry like "Rustdoc warning sweep" has matured — the
|
||||
- A backlog issue like "Rustdoc warning sweep" has matured — the
|
||||
surface it targets has not moved for a while.
|
||||
- Onboarding-readability check: navigating `cargo doc --open` for a
|
||||
crate is not self-supporting without the design/ ledger.
|
||||
@@ -86,4 +86,4 @@ iteration; `docwriter` does not self-resolve.
|
||||
Fieldtest can surface bugs or architecture problems that would
|
||||
invalidate the doc work.
|
||||
- **Hand-off target:** orchestrator (me). Findings flow into the
|
||||
roadmap as candidates for a follow-up tidy iteration.
|
||||
Gitea backlog as candidates for a follow-up tidy iteration.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ YOU NEVER COMMIT. RUSTDOC EDITS LIVE IN THE WORKING TREE; THE BOSS COMMITS.
|
||||
confusing it needs renaming, raise it in your report instead of changing
|
||||
it.
|
||||
- No new `pub` exports. Visibility stays as-is.
|
||||
- No edits in `docs/` or `design/`. The orchestrator owns the design/ ledger and the roadmap.
|
||||
- No edits in `docs/` or `design/`. The orchestrator owns the design/ ledger and the Gitea backlog.
|
||||
- Don't paper over broken behaviour with prose — if doc-writing surfaces
|
||||
a real bug (a function whose doc you cannot honestly write because it
|
||||
doesn't actually do what it claims), stop and report it.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user