Files
AILang/skills
Brummel 8698d897b6 fieldtest-form-a: 4 fixtures + spec report; agent doctrine update
Boss-dispatched fieldtest at milestone close. Agent authored 4 .ail
fixtures (factorial smoke + Show user-ADT + user-class Describe with
two instances + two-module workspace) from DESIGN.md + form_a.md only
(no compiler-source reads, no spec-of-milestone reads). All four
fixtures `ail check` ok and `ail run` produces expected stdout.

Findings (1 bug, 1 friction, 2 spec_gaps, 3 working):

- [bug] instance-method-body unbound-var bypasses `ail check` —
  forma_3 first attempt called `str_concat` inside the instance
  method body; `ail check` returned ok, `ail build` died with the
  monomorphise_workspace "unknown identifier" diagnostic. Same
  shape at fn-body level correctly fires `[unbound-var]` at check
  time. Next: debug skill, RED-first against `ail check`.

- [friction] no `str_concat` primitive. Every realistic Show MyType
  body wants string concatenation; the absence forced the agent to
  shape examples around bare int_to_str / ctor-arity-1 patterns.
  Next: small planner tidy iter wiring `str_concat` symmetric to
  `str_clone` and `int_to_str`.

- [spec_gap] form_a.md has zero references to class, instance,
  constraint, or method productions — pre-22 surface only. The
  form-a-default-authoring milestone made .ail the authoring form,
  but the form_a spec doc remains pre-typeclass.

- [spec_gap] form_a.md leaves the class-qualifier ambiguity in
  `(instance (class X))` unspecified — bare-class-name vs canonical-
  form rule from mq.1 is not documented at the surface level. The
  agent picked the bare-name reading from the corpus; the canonical-
  form reading is equally plausible from the schema.

Boss-side cleanup at commit time:
- Deleted 8 stale .ail.json sidecars in examples/fieldtest/ (4
  forma_* derived by the fieldtester per old dual-form workflow + 4
  pre-existing floats_* from the prior fieldtest milestone that
  iter form-a.1 T8 missed because the bash deletion loop globbed
  only examples/*.ail.json direct children).
- Updated skills/fieldtest/agents/ailang-fieldtester.md to remove
  the now-obsolete "generate canonical JSON sidecar" step (Phase 3
  rewritten + Iron Law + Reading list + Common Rationalisations +
  Red Flags all aligned to the post-form-a single-form doctrine).

cargo test --workspace: 557 passed, 0 failed, 3 ignored (unchanged
from audit-form-a — the fieldtest fixtures are standalone, not
referenced by any test).

Findings deferred to follow-up iters; the milestone close itself is
still clean.
2026-05-13 11:48:58 +02:00
..

AILang Skill System

This directory holds the project-local development skills. A skill is a SKILL.md plus the agents that skill primarily dispatches. Skills formalise the AILang development cycle into named, trigger-bound discipline so the orchestrator (me) cannot accidentally diverge from established practice without explicitly violating a named rule.

The system was bootstrapped on 2026-05-09. See docs/specs/2026-05-09-skill-system.md for the design and docs/journal-archive.md ("Skill system live") for the rationale.

The eight skills

Skill Trigger Output Mandatory?
brainstorm New milestone starting docs/specs/<milestone>.md Hard-gate before plan
planner New iteration within an open milestone docs/plans/<iteration>.md Hard-gate before implement
implement Plan exists Code + tests + per-iter journal entry, all uncommitted in the working tree Standard iteration path
audit Milestone closing OR baseline drift suspected Drift report + bench-regression report Mandatory at milestone close
docwriter API surface stabilized; rustdoc lag suspected rustdoc updates in /// and //!, uncommitted in the working tree No — Boss-dispatched only
fieldtest Boss-dispatched post-audit field test on a milestone that touched user-visible surface 2-4 .ail example fixtures + docs/specs/<date>-fieldtest-<milestone>.md, all uncommitted in the working tree No — Boss-dispatched only
debug Bug encountered (failing test, segfault, wrong stdout) RED-test in the working tree (uncommitted) + cause analysis Mandatory RED-first for any bug
boss User-invoked only (/boss) Autonomous orchestration session — dispatches existing skills until done-state or bounce-back No — user-gated

Pipeline

Inside a /boss session the orchestrator walks this pipeline autonomously. Outside /boss, the pipeline runs only when the user explicitly invokes a skill.

[new milestone]                                  [bug observed]
       |                                                |
       v                                                v
 brainstorm  ->  plan  ->  implement                  debug -> implement (mini)
       (per iteration loop)
                  |
       [milestone close]
                  |
                  v
                audit  --(drift)--> plan + implement (tidy iteration)
                       --(ratify)-> JOURNAL + --update-baseline
                       --(clean)-+
                                 |
                       [Boss: iter complete? if surface-touch:]
                                 v
                            fieldtest --(bug)------> debug -> implement (mini)
                                      --(friction)-> brainstorm OR plan (tidy)
                                      --(spec_gap)-> ratify OR tighten DESIGN.md
                                      --(clean)----+
                                                   |
                                       [Boss: surface stable across N milestones?]
                                                   v
                                              docwriter (rustdoc sweep)
                                                   |
                                                   v
                                            next milestone

Skipping rules are codified in each SKILL.md. Ad-hoc skipping is forbidden by design.

Agent roster

Agents live next to the skill that primarily dispatches them. There are no orphan agents (an anti-pattern after the 2026-05-09 build-out).

Agent Path Dispatched by skill
ailang-grounding-check brainstorm/agents/ brainstorm (Step 7.5; spec grounding hard-gate)
ailang-plan-recon planner/agents/ planner (Step 2; read-only file-structure mapping); brainstorm (ad-hoc Step 1 in unfamiliar territory)
ailang-implement-orchestrator implement/agents/ implement (the dispatched agent; runs the entire per-task loop inline in its own context)
ailang-implementer implement/agents/ phase reference for ailang-implement-orchestrator Phase 2.1 (implementer mindset, carries TDD as an independent layer); not dispatched as a separate subagent
ailang-spec-reviewer implement/agents/ phase reference for ailang-implement-orchestrator Phase 2.2 (spec-compliance mindset); not dispatched as a separate subagent
ailang-quality-reviewer implement/agents/ phase reference for ailang-implement-orchestrator Phase 2.3 (quality-review mindset); not dispatched as a separate subagent
ailang-tester implement/agents/ phase reference for ailang-implement-orchestrator Phase 3 (E2E coverage); not dispatched as a separate subagent
ailang-architect audit/agents/ audit (Step 1; drift review against DESIGN.md + spec)
ailang-bencher audit/agents/ audit (regression diagnostics — hypothesis-driven)
ailang-docwriter docwriter/agents/ docwriter (Boss-dispatched rustdoc sweep post-stability)
ailang-debugger debug/agents/ debug (RED-first; hands off GREEN to implement mini-mode)
ailang-fieldtester fieldtest/agents/ fieldtest (writes real-world examples in .ail Surface form against DESIGN.md only — never the compiler source)

Each agent file has YAML frontmatter (name, description, tools) plus a system-prompt body. The description field is the one-sentence summary the orchestrator (or a skill) reads to decide whether to dispatch.

Agent structure

Every agent file follows the same superpowers-derived template:

  • Frontmatter: name, description (third-person, "Use when…" or description of role), tools.
  • Spirit-letter lead-in: > Violating the letter of these rules is violating the spirit.
  • What this role is for: one short paragraph naming the failure mode the agent exists to prevent.
  • Standing reading list: the always-binding documents (CLAUDE.md, DESIGN.md, latest per-iter journals, plus role-specific anchors).
  • Carrier contract: what the controller hands the agent (task_text, diff, hypothesis, etc.). Agents do NOT open docs/plans/ or docs/specs/ directly — context curation lives at the skill level.
  • Iron Law: the non-negotiable rules of the role.
  • The Process: numbered steps.
  • Status protocol: structured terminal status the controller acts on. For implementer / tester / debugger / bencher / docwriter: DONE / DONE_WITH_CONCERNS / NEEDS_CONTEXT / BLOCKED. For reviewers: role-specific (compliant / non_compliant / unclear / infra_blocked for spec; approved / changes_requested / infra_blocked for quality).
  • Output format: word-budgeted, structured.
  • Common Rationalisations: excuse → reality table, calibrated to past failure modes.
  • Red Flags — STOP: bullet list of "if you're about to do this, stop" signals.

TDD as an independent layer

Note that ailang-implementer carries Test-Driven Development as an independent discipline, not just as plan-template fallout. Even if the plan task forgot to script a RED-first step, the implementer adds it inline before writing production code. This mirrors the superpowers split: subagent-driven-development (orchestration, outer loop) is in skills/implement/SKILL.md; test-driven-development (per- task, inner loop) is in skills/implement/agents/ailang-implementer.md. The two skills exist at different layers and stack.

Discovery

Two symlink sets, both tracked in git, no setup needed after clone:

Skills are reachable under .claude/skills/ so Claude Code's Skill tool can invoke them:

.claude/skills/brainstorm -> skills/brainstorm
.claude/skills/planner    -> skills/planner
.claude/skills/implement  -> skills/implement
.claude/skills/audit      -> skills/audit
.claude/skills/docwriter  -> skills/docwriter
.claude/skills/fieldtest  -> skills/fieldtest
.claude/skills/debug      -> skills/debug

Agents are reachable under .claude/agents/ so subagent dispatch can find them by subagent_type:

.claude/agents/brainstorm  -> skills/brainstorm/agents
.claude/agents/planner    -> skills/planner/agents
.claude/agents/implement  -> skills/implement/agents
.claude/agents/audit      -> skills/audit/agents
.claude/agents/docwriter  -> skills/docwriter/agents
.claude/agents/fieldtest  -> skills/fieldtest/agents
.claude/agents/debug      -> skills/debug/agents

Conventions

  • Only the Boss commits. No skill agent — implementer, brainstormer, planner, debugger, fieldtester, docwriter, architect, bencher — performs git commit. Agents write their artefacts (spec, plan, code, tests, fixtures, rustdoc edits, RED tests, journal files, stats files, updated baselines) to the working tree as unstaged changes. The Boss inspects with git status / git diff and commits when there is something consistent to commit. Per-task or per-phase commits are not a goal; the iter (or the cohesive change) is the unit of commit.
  • main HEAD is sacrosanct. No actor (Boss or agent) runs git reset or git revert on main. main moves forward only via Boss commits; bad work stays in the working tree where it is still discardable via git checkout -- <path> (Boss-side, not on main HEAD).
  • No orphan agents. Every agent lives under the skill that dispatches it. If a recurring need does not fit any skill, raise the question via a per-iter journal entry before adding the agent.
  • Agents do not call other agents. The dispatching skill composes (e.g. audit dispatches architect, then bencher). No agent receives the Agent tool in its frontmatter — Claude Code does not permit a subagent to spawn other subagents. The ailang-implement-orchestrator, which historically was framed as a named exception, runs its per-task phases as sequential role-switches inside its own context (implementer phase → spec check → quality check); see skills/implement/SKILL.md for the mechanism and docs/journals/2026-05-11-iter-or.2.md for the revision history.
  • Standing reading list stays in the agent file. The skill provides the carrier (task text, bug symptom, drift focus, hypothesis) on top of the agent's standing reading list (CLAUDE.md, DESIGN.md, latest per-iter journals, role-specific anchors). Agents do NOT open docs/plans/ or docs/specs/ directly — context curation lives at the skill level.
  • Skill and agent definitions are reviewable code. Edits go through git. Commit messages name why the role shifted.

Adding a new skill

  1. Decide what triggers it and what it produces.
  2. Write skills/<name>/SKILL.md with frontmatter (name, description starting "Use when…"). Keep the description trigger-focused; never a workflow summary.
  3. If the skill dispatches subagents, add them under skills/<name>/agents/ and create .claude/agents/<name> as a symlink to that directory.
  4. Update this file (skill table + agent roster).
  5. If the skill replaces or supersedes a CLAUDE.md section, migrate that section: leave a one-line pointer in CLAUDE.md.

Adding a new agent

  1. Decide which skill primarily dispatches it.
  2. Add the .md file under that skill's agents/ directory.
  3. Update the agent roster above and the dispatching skill's "Cross-references" section.
  4. If the agent is genuinely standalone (no skill dispatches it), raise the question via a per-iter journal entry first.