Reconsidered 14d's removal of Term::If. The decision was wrong.
"No redundancies" requires judgment; reducibility (if -> match)
is not redundancy in the strong sense. Term::If is a primitive
control-flow shape; bool branching is the second most common
shape after sequencing, and removing it cost 3x tokens on every
branch site (`(if c a b)` 4 tokens vs the match-on-Bool form
12 tokens).
Meta-pattern fixed: I had been treating user observations as
directives. User said "if is a subset of match"; I jumped to
remove it citing CLAUDE.md, with no independent conviction.
The leak appeared in 14f's JOURNAL prose ("three lines for what
if used to do in one"), which read as regret. Two feedback
memories saved (memory/feedback_user_suggestions_not_directives,
memory/feedback_no_nostalgia_for_removed_features) to head this
off.
Implementation: mechanical reverse-application of 14d's diff at
every site (AST, check including the 14e tail-position arm,
codegen 4 sites, surface parser/printer, pretty, CLI walker,
e2e test mutation). Removed lower_bool_match helper — it existed
only because 14d's migration shape needed codegen for non-ptr
match scrutinees; with Term::If back, match-on-Bool returns to
its pre-14d unsupported state. Three fixtures (sum, sort, max3)
restored to pre-14d shape. gc_stress (added in 14f) also
migrated back to (if ...) since it was authored under the wrong
constraint.
14e (musttail) and 14f (GC_malloc) verified intact in IR.
Hashes restored to pre-14d values:
- sum.sum: db33f57cb329935e
- sort.insert: 697fcb9f30f8633a
- max3.max: 65c45d6a45dd0a72
- max3.max3: 624b14429bf302f5
All other defs across all 18 fixtures keep their post-14f
hashes. Tests 80/80 green; cargo doc 0 warnings. LOC delta
+265/-295 net -30.
DESIGN.md Decision 7 preserved with a "Status: REVERTED" header
for audit trail. Form-(A) `if-term` production restored.
Plan: back to 15a (std_maybe stdlib module).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
100 KiB
JOURNAL
Chronological notes for myself. Not every change; only decisions, obstacles, and observations that future iterations will need.
2026-05-07 — Day 0
- Repo initialised. Assignment in
CLAUDE.md: LLM-native language, LLVM backend. - Design decisions captured in
docs/DESIGN.md. - Toolchain:
rustc 1.94,llvm-config 22.1.3,clangavailable. - Decided against
inkwellin favour of LLVM IR text emit. Rationale in DESIGN.md. - Workspace layout:
crates/ailang-core— AST, type, hash, JSON schemacrates/ailang-check— typechecker (comes later)crates/ailang-codegen— lowering + LLVM IR emitcrates/ail— CLI
- MVP goal:
examples/sum.ail.json→ binary that prints 55. Achieved.
2026-05-07 — architecture review after the MVP
Still on track? Broadly yes. Concrete observations:
What holds:
- JSON AST + canonical form + content hash are all lego bricks that later
tools can build on without a refactor (
ail deps,ail diff). - The LLVM IR text pipeline works as planned. No libllvm version pain.
- The effect set is wired into the type system from the start. Extensible to row-poly without touching the core.
Debt that accrues interest:
current_block_label_for_phiis a heuristic (see codegen). On nestedifterms it will return the wrong block label, because it scans the body backwards. Ticking, because no test cases trigger it yet. Must be fixed next, before new language features arrive.- No typed AST. Codegen reads the source AST directly and relies on the typechecker having run before. Fine for the MVP; once ADTs or closures arrive, I will need a separate typed IR stage (TIR).
- The
hashfield is not in the AST. Right now we hash the def object directly. Once I serialise hashes as fields (caching), the hash will need to exclude that field before computation.
Plan iteration 2 (now):
- Clean up block-label tracking, with a nested-if test.
- Strings as a literal +
io/print_str. - Hello-world example as a second E2E test.
- CLI:
--jsonoutput for machine consumers wherever it fits.
Plan iteration 3:
ADTs + pattern matching. That is the next big jump. Requires a typed IR stage (TIR), because pattern matching lowers into decision trees, which have a different shape from the AST.
2026-05-07 — iteration 2 done
- Block-label tracking is now robust (nested
ifs work). Testmax3_picks_largestprotects it. - Strings as
Lit::Str { value }, typeStr-> LLVMptr, withio/print_streffect op.examples/hello.ail.jsonprints a string. - CLI:
manifest --json,builtins --jsonfor tool consumers. ail deps [--of NAME] [--json]lists call edges. Effect ops are taggedeffect:NAMEso a consumer can filter them.
Architecture check: no structural deviations. Codegen still reads the source AST directly (a TIR stage will become necessary with ADTs in iteration 3).
2026-05-07 — iteration 3 done: ADTs
- TypeDef in the AST with ctors. A ctor has
nameandfields: [Type...]. - Term::Ctor (construction) and Term::Match (pattern matching).
- Patterns:
Wild,Var,Lit,Ctor { ctor, fields }. In the MVP, nested ctor patterns are NOT allowed — sub-patterns must beVarorWild. - Typechecker with a type registry and
ctor_index(ctor name → ADT). In Match, exhaustiveness is checked against the full constructor set. A negative test protects this. - Codegen: boxed heap layout. Per ctor application,
malloc(8 + 8*n)bytes; tag at offset 0, fields from offset 8 (8-byte slots, native typed load/store). Match: load tag + switch + arm blocks + phi at the join. examples/list.ail.json(Cons/Nil list, sum_list via match) returns 42.
Surprisingly painless. The architecture decisions from day 0 paid off: opaque ptr in LLVM 22 makes the boxed layout almost glue-free; effect tracking was untouched by ADTs; the JSON AST takes new node types cleanly.
Debt accrued:
- Codegen still reads the source AST directly. The temptation to push on without TIR was strong — and worked, because my Match restrictions are flat (no nested patterns). Once nested patterns arrive, decision- tree lowering will not stay clean without TIR. Debt acknowledged; not due now.
- No GC. The heap leaks. Acceptable for demo programs; must be addressed before any longer-running program. Options for Phase 4: refcount, Boehm-GC linkage, region inference.
- No runtime pretty-printer for ADT values.
io/print_intis enough for demos, but a genericshow :: a -> Strfor ADTs would be valuable. Requires dispatch over the tag — feasible, but not now.
Plan iteration 4:
The next steps are less obvious. Three candidates in priority order:
- Module system (imports). Right now everything is in a single module. With multiple modules + cross-module hashing the language only becomes practical for several defs.
- Structured error output (
ail check --json). So tools can react to type errors without parsing text. - Closures / higher-order functions. Requires closure conversion and is a bigger step.
Iteration 4 will be (1) + (2) — both strengthen the LLM tooling and have moderate risk.
2026-05-07 — workflow change: orchestrator + agent repo
At the user's suggestion, switching to orchestrator mode: I delegate clearly bounded implementation chunks to sub-agents and keep only architecture decisions, reviews, and commit discipline. Four specialised agents drafted: implementer, architect, tester, debugger.
Important correction: the user required the agents not to be hidden in
.claude/agents/, but versioned as a visible part of the project under
agents/. DESIGN.md gained a new section "Project ecosystem", which
records this: AILang is not just a language, but language core + CLI +
examples + agents + docs + tests, all of equal weight.
Invocation scheme: the system-prompt body from agents/<name>.md as a
prefix before the concrete task + sent to the general-purpose agent.
Functionally identical to subagent loading from .claude/agents/, but
visible in the repo.
Plan iteration 4 (revised):
The module system is more involved than expected (cross-module hashing, import resolution). First the smaller tooling wins, then the module system as iteration 5:
- Structured error output (
ail check --jsonwith a Diagnostic struct, stable codes likeunbound-var,type-mismatch). ail diff <a> <b>— semantic module diff via per-def hash comparison.- IR snapshot tests — regression protection for the codegen pipeline.
2026-05-07 — iteration 4 done: LLM tooling consolidation
Three sub-commits, each produced by an ailang-implementer invocation
and spot-checked by the orchestrator:
93fe723Iter 4a:ail check --jsonwith aDiagnosticstruct (severity,code,message,def,ctx). Stable codes:unbound-var,type-mismatch,arity-mismatch,non-exhaustive-match,unknown-ctor,unknown-ctor-in-pattern,nested-ctor-pattern-not-allowed,duplicate-def,unknown-effect-op,unknown-type,schema-mismatch. API:check_module(&Module) -> Vec<Diagnostic>.c652b12Iter 4b:ail diff <a> <b> [--json]as a structural top-level def diff via BLAKE3 hash. Four categories (added/removed/changed/ unchanged), sorted alphabetically, exit code 1 on diff.74a2005Iter 4c: IR snapshot tests incrates/ail/tests/snapshots/{sum,max3,hello,list}.ll. Normalisation oftarget triple. Update viaUPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=1 cargo test ir_snapshot_. Mismatch produces an.actualfile.
Test count: 28 (previously 19). 7 E2E + 4 IR snapshot + 9 ailang-check + 1 ailang-codegen + 7 ailang-core.
Closed from the debt register:
- Block tracking in codegen has not been a heuristic risk since Iter 2;
the explicit
current_block: Stringtrack is now additionally protected against regression by Iter 4c snapshot tests. Debt closed.
New / sharpened debt:
check_moduleis single-shot — the first error aborts, no multi-diagnostic gathering. The spec was that way, but the format suggests Vec semantics. A real multi-diagnostic refactor will be cheaper once TIR exists (a central error accumulator via a separate stage). Not due now.source_filenamein the IR is hard-coded to"<module>.ail". As long as there is only one top-level module, that is platform-stable. With Iter 5 (module system + imports) the path becomes relevant — keep it path-independent at construction time, otherwise the snapshots will tip over.
Plan iteration 5: module system with imports. Cross-module hashing,
import resolution, multiple .ail.json files in one build. The multi-
diagnostic refactor only after that.
Sub-steps:
- 5a — workspace loader.
ailang_core::Workspace { modules: BTreeMap<String, Module> }plusload_workspace(entry: &Path), which followsimportsrecursively from the entry module. Convention:import { module: "foo" }resolves to<dir>/foo.ail.jsonnext to the entry. Cycle detection. CLI: existing subcommands keep working on a single module; a newail workspace <entry>lists all reachable modules with hash. Tests: two small example modules with an import relation; cycle test. - 5b — cross-module typecheck. The typechecker takes
&Workspaceinstead of&Module. Imports are mounted in the env as a namespace (alias.defor, with no alias,module.def). New diagnostic codes:unknown-module,unknown-import,import-cycle,ambiguous-name. Tests per code. - 5c — cross-module codegen. The emitter produces IR for all modules
in the workspace, prefix-mangled with
@ail_<module>_<def>. E2E test: a program that uses a function from module B in module A returns the correct result in the binary. - 5d — tooling adjustments.
manifest,describe,deps,diffgain a--workspacemode (recursive). The single mode stays the default for backwards compatibility.
During Iter 5, at construction time keep source_filename
path-independent (module name only, no directory prefix), otherwise
the IR snapshots will tip over.
2026-05-07 — Iter 5b done: cross-module typecheck
check_workspace(&Workspace) -> Vec<Diagnostic>as the top-level API.check_moduleis preserved and internally lifts the module into a trivial workspace.- Convention for qualified references (recorded in DESIGN.md):
Term::Var { name }with exactly one dot =<prefix>.<def>. Prefix is an import alias or module name. No new AST node, no renamed fields ⇒ hashes stay stable; allir_snapshot_*still green. - Three new diagnostic codes:
unknown-module,unknown-import,invalid-def-name(withctx.reason: "contains-dot"). - CLI:
ail check <entry>now always loads viaload_workspace. Workspace load failures become structured diagnostics in JSON mode with codesmodule-not-found,module-cycle,module-name-mismatch,module-hash-mismatch,schema-mismatch.ail buildandail emit-irstay per single module (cross-module codegen is 5c). - Examples:
ws_main.ail.jsonnow callsws_lib.add(observable). New:ws_broken.ail.json(unknown-import),ws_unknown_module.ail.json(unknown-module). - Tests: 37 green (previously 32). 4 new workspace integration tests in
crates/ailang-check/tests/workspace.rs, one new e2e testcheck_workspace_resolves_import. - Debt: single-shot diagnostics still in place (multi-diagnostic after
5c). The dot convention covers exactly one dot — nested module paths
(
a.b.c) do not exist; that would only be a topic with hierarchical modules and currently falls through asunbound-var.
2026-05-07 — Iter 5c done: cross-module codegen
- Mangling break (deliberate). All AILang functions are now called
@ail_<module>_<def>, even in single-module programs. The old form@ail_<def>is gone. Strings/const globals analogously (@.str_<module>_<hint>_<idx>,@ail_<module>_<const>). The entry point staysmainas C ABI: adefine i32 @main()trampoline calls@ail_<entry-module>_main(). If the entry module has nomain : () -> Unit !IO, the build fails withMissingEntryMain. - Workspace lowering. New top-level API
ailang_codegen::lower_workspace(ws: &Workspace) -> Result<String>produces a single.llfor the whole workspace. Modules in alphabetical order (BTreeMap order); defs in AST order. Cross-module calls are resolved in codegen via the import map of the calling module — same logic as in the typechecker, locally duplicated with a cross-reference (no shared helper module, because the type worlds differ: the typechecker handlesType, codegen handlesFnSigfrom llvm types). - CLI.
ail buildandail emit-irnow always load the workspace and check/lower it fully. Single-module programs keep working (trivial workspace with one module).emit_ir(m)stays in the codegen crate as a convenience API and internally wraps into a trivial workspace. - Snapshots regenerated.
sum.ll,max3.ll,hello.ll,list.llshow the new mangling. Newws_main.llsnapshot documents the cross-module build:@ail_ws_main_maincalls@ail_ws_lib_add. - Tests. 40 green (previously 37). New:
workspace_build_runs_imported_fn(e2e: prints 5),ir_snapshot_ws_main,missing_entry_main_is_error(codegen unit). Existing behaviour tests (sum_1_to_10_is_55,max3_picks_largest,hello_world_str_lit,list_sum_via_match) stay green — behaviour unchanged, only the mangling is new.
Debt closed:
- #19 (
source_filenamehardening). In the workspace world,source_filenameis now uniformly<entry-module>.ail, once per workspace. The previous hard-coded path dot is gone with it.
State: the module system is closed end to end — loader + typecheck + codegen + build see the workspace as a coherent unit. The multi- diagnostic refactor and possibly cross-module ADTs remain for later.
2026-05-07 — Iter 5d done: tooling extended to the workspace
ail manifest|describe|deps|diff <entry> --workspacenow operate across all modules of the workspace. The default without the flag stays single-module for backwards compatibility. Manifest sorts by(module, name), describe accepts dotted notationws_lib.add, deps emits{from_module, from_def, to_module, to_def}edges, diff compares workspace-wide with added/removed/changed/unchanged_modules and a nested sub-diff per changed_module.- Refactor:
diff_def_listsis the single source of the four-category logic; single and workspace diff share it. - Tests: 44 green (previously 40). New:
manifest_workspace_lists_all_defs,describe_workspace_resolves_qualified_name,deps_workspace_includes_cross_module,diff_workspace_added_module.
Observation (debt): deps does not filter builtins/locals/function
parameters. In workspace mode that becomes more visible than in single
mode — ws_lib.add lists edges to ws_lib.+ (builtin) and
ws_lib.a/ws_lib.b (function parameters). A known pre-existing
issue from Iter 2; Task #22 in the backlog.
2026-05-07 — architecture review after Iter 5
Architect agent invoked. Findings:
- Mangling consistency holds.
@ail_<module>_<def>is consistent across functions, constants, string globals, and cross-module calls. The trampoline is correct. ADT constructors are deliberately symbol-free (inline malloc). - Module hashes bit-identical since Iter 4. The Iter 5c snapshot regeneration was a codegen-output change, not a hash break.
- Drift, due now:
- DESIGN.md says
define i64 @main(), codegen emitsdefine i32 @main()(seesum.ll:35). - String-schema notation in DESIGN.md was shortened
(
@.str_<module>_<idx>instead of@.str_<module>_<hint>_<idx>).
- DESIGN.md says
- Debt that accrues interest: the
depsbuiltin leak (Task #22) has become a falsehood in workspace mode — close it before the next big jump.
Plan iteration 6 — clean-up:
- Fix DESIGN.md drift. Update the mangling-scheme block, correct the
@mainsignature, and note the string globals precisely. depshardening (#22). Build a top-level def table per workspace; filter edges whose target is not a top-level symbol, or emit them as separatebuiltin:/local:categories. Function parameters via lexical scope tracking from walk_term.- Multi-diagnostic refactor (#20).
check_workspaceaccumulatesVec<Diagnostic>across all defs instead of short-circuiting on the first error. Intra-def may still short-circuit — the value is "see all broken defs at once", not "see all broken sub-terms of one def".
Order: 1 first (doc triviality), then 2 before 3 (deps is a tooling- truth fix, multi-diag is a structural extension).
2026-05-07 — Iter 6 done: deps hardening + multi-diagnose + DESIGN audit
Three things landed together. All small, all KISS — no architecture move, just paying off recorded debt.
1. ail deps filters builtins, params, and let/match bindings (#22).
Before: sum -> +, -, ==, n, sum and ws_lib.add -> ws_lib.+,
ws_lib.a, ws_lib.b. After: sum -> sum, ws_lib.add -> ws_lib.add
gone (no real deps; only the cross-module call from ws_main remains).
Implementation:
- New helper
ailang_check::builtins::value_names(): derives the Var-level builtin names (+ - * / % == != < <= > >= not) fromlist(), so the install-list and the deps-filter share one source of truth. walk_termincrates/ail/src/main.rsnow threads ascopeset: fn-params seed it;Letadds the bound name for the body only;Matcharms add their pattern variables (bind_patternhelper, MVP rule "ctor sub-patterns are Var/Wild") and roll them back after. Var refs that hitscopeorbuiltinsare dropped; qualified names (prefix.def) are passed through unconditionally — the typechecker forbids dots in def names, so no shadowing risk.- Tests added:
deps_filters_builtins_params_locals,deps_workspace_filters_builtins_and_params. The Iter 5d test (deps_workspace_includes_cross_module) keeps passing — the only edge it asserted is the legitimate one.
2. check_module / check_workspace are multi-diagnose (#20).
check_in_workspace returns Vec<CheckError> instead of Result<()>.
Pass-1 (top-level symbol table) stays fail-fast — corrupt globals would
taint every later diagnostic. Type-def installation is fail-fast within
a module (env corruption) but the outer module loop continues. The
body-check loop is the multi-diagnose layer: each def is checked against
the assembled env, errors accumulate, the next def is attempted.
Test: body_errors_accumulate_across_defs — one module with two
independent body errors (arity mismatch + unknown var) yields two
diagnostics with the right def field. The legacy single-error check
keeps working by .into_iter().next()-ing the Vec, so internal snapshot
tests in crates/ailang-check/src/lib.rs are unchanged.
Out of scope: intra-def collection. A single fn body with three type errors still reports one. The "see all broken defs at once" goal is met; intra-def will require unification deferral and isn't due now.
3. DESIGN.md What the MVP is NOT audit (#24).
The section was lying: it claimed "No ADTs / pattern matching" (delivered
Iter 3) and "Only ints + bools + unit" (strings landed Iter 2). Renamed
to What is not (yet) supported, restructured into "not yet" + "what is
supported (smoke-tested)". New invariant: this section is meant to be
the truth at the end of the latest iteration, not a 2026-05-07-day-0
scope statement.
Architecture check (the user-asked self-questioning):
- Would I use this language now? For non-recursive arithmetic + ADT programs over int/bool/str: yes, comfortably. For anything that needs mapping, folding, generic data structures: no, closures are the blocker. That's the next big sprint, not Iter 7.
- Consistency: DESIGN.md, JOURNAL.md, code, and CLI output now agree on what the language can do. The "What is not (yet) supported" block is the canonical truth surface.
- Visualisation:
ail deps --workspace --jsonis now a clean cross-module call graph (no builtin noise). Good enough for an external graph renderer to consume; a built-in DOT/ASCII renderer is possible future tooling, not "we need it now". KISS. - Documentation: the agents/ directory is the sub-prompt layer, the JOURNAL is the iteration log, DESIGN.md is the contract. No new doc axes needed at this scale.
Tests: 47 green (previously 44). +2 deps tests in e2e.rs, +1
multi-diag test in crates/ailang-check/tests/workspace.rs.
Plan iteration 7:
Closures + higher-order functions. This is the big jump that DESIGN.md / Day 0 has been pointing at: it requires a typed IR (TIR) stage, closure conversion in lowering, and a heap-aware ABI. The multi-diag refactor in Iter 6 was scoped intentionally minimal — when TIR lands, intra-def diagnostics become structurally cheap and Task #20 gets revisited.
2026-05-07 — Iter 7 done: first-class function references (no capture)
Iter 6 outlined Iter 7 as "closures + HOFs + TIR". KISS course-correct on inspection: that bundle had three independent things in it, and the HOF use-cases (passing functions around, calling through fn-typed parameters) need none of TIR or capture. Splitting paid off — what landed here is ~120 LOC of codegen, no TIR, no heap, no ABI churn. Closures with capture stay queued for Iter 8 (where TIR is the correct precondition).
What works now:
- Top-level fn name (or qualified
prefix.def) used as a value yields an LLVM fn-pointer (@ail_<m>_<def>, typeptr). - Fn-typed parameters can be called as
f(args)— the body emits an indirectcall <ret> (<param-tys>) %f(...). - Pass through
let:let g = inc in g(x)works (the local just aliases the global SSA, the sidetable lookup still hits). - Pass to another fn:
apply(inc, 41) == 42— seeexamples/hof.ail.json, exercised end-to-end.
What does not (yet) work — by design:
- No anonymous lambdas. The only fn-value source is a top-level def reference.
- No capture. A fn-value is always a constant pointer to a top-level def; there is no environment to allocate.
- Both deferred to Iter 8 where they share the TIR + closure-conversion preconditions.
Implementation, in order of where the rubber meets the road:
llvm_typelearnedType::Fn { .. } -> "ptr". The actual signature travels separately. New helperfn_sig_from_typelifts an AILang fn-type into anFnSig(LLVM types only).Emittergot a sidetable:ssa_fn_sigs: BTreeMap<String, FnSig>, keyed by SSA value (or@global). It's reset per function body.- At
emit_fnentry, every fn-typed parameter registers(%arg_<name>, sig)in the sidetable. lower_term(Term::Var)now falls through to a top-level fn lookup (resolve_top_level_fn) when the name isn't a local. The returned SSA is the global symbol; the sidetable gets the sig.lower_term(Term::App)dispatches:- if callee is a
VarAND not shadowed AND statically known (is_static_calleecovers builtin operators, qualifiedprefix.def, current-module fns), keep the existing directlower_apppath — no extra indirection in the IR; - otherwise lower the callee, expect type
ptr, look up the sig in the sidetable, emitemit_indirect_call.
- if callee is a
Term::Ifpropagates the sig to its phi SSA when both branches are fn-pointers with matching sigs (cheap two-line copy; no separate test, falls out of theapply-on-conditional pattern).
Why no typechecker change? The typechecker already accepted
fn-typed locals (Term::Var against env.globals, App via synth(callee)
unifying with Type::Fn). The only blocker was MVP: callee must be a variable in codegen.
Tests: 48 green (previously 47).
crates/ail/tests/e2e.rs::higher_order_apply_incbuilds and runsexamples/hof.ail.json, asserts the binary prints42.- Existing tests unchanged (incl. snapshot tests around the IR
emission for
sum,list,max3).
Architecture self-check:
- Would I use this language now? Yes for
apply-style and "pass a predicate" patterns. Still no for capturing closures (let n = 3 in map(\x -> x + n, xs)-equivalent), but the ergonomic gap shrank. - Consistency: DESIGN.md "What is not (yet) supported" rewritten in the same edit; first-class fn-refs now have a positive bullet, the closures bullet is precise about what it means (no capture, no lambdas).
- Visualisation:
ail describe/manifestalready render fn-typed params correctly via the existingpretty::type_to_string(((Int) -> Int, Int) -> Int). No tooling change required. - KISS: every alternative I considered (full
LocalTypeenum, swapping(String, String)returns to a typed wrapper, lifting lambdas to defs as syntactic sugar) was strictly more code than the sidetable approach, with no expressivity gain.
Plan iteration 8:
Closures with capture, anonymous lambdas, the typed IR (TIR) layer,
closure conversion in lowering. Now that we have indirect calls
working, the main delta is: a fn-value also needs an environment
pointer, the sidetable becomes per-value (heap-allocated), and the
calling convention shifts to (env_ptr, args...). Touches every
existing call path — that's why it gets its own iteration.
2026-05-07 — Iter 8 done: closures with capture (no TIR needed)
Iter 7's plan named TIR as the prerequisite for closures. On
inspection that bundling was wrong — TIR is one possible
implementation strategy, not a structural requirement. The
typechecker already attaches enough type information through synth
that the codegen can read capture types out of self.locals
directly. So Iter 8 ships closures without introducing TIR. KISS
won.
The work split into two commits:
Iter 8a — closure-pair ABI flip. Every fn-value is now a ptr to
a heap or static closure pair { thunk_ptr, env_ptr }, regardless of
whether it came from a lambda or a top-level def reference. To keep
top-level-fn references cheap, every top-level fn auto-emits:
define <ret> @ail_<m>_<f>_adapter(ptr %_env, <params>) {
%r = call <ret> @ail_<m>_<f>(<args>)
ret <ret> %r
}
@ail_<m>_<f>_clos = constant { ptr, ptr } { @adapter, null }
Term::Var resolving to a top-level fn returns the address of
_clos, never the bare fn pointer. emit_indirect_call was
rewritten to GEP+load both halves and call thunk(env, args...).
Direct calls (statically-known callees in Term::App) bypass the
adapter and stay at the original speed.
The Iter 7 hof example (apply(inc, 41)) continues to print 42
unchanged — only the IR shape changed, not the source. IR snapshot
files for sum/list/max3/hello/ws_main were refreshed.
Iter 8b — Term::Lam + capture + lambda lifting. New AST node:
{ "t": "lam",
"params": ["x"...],
"paramTypes": [Type...],
"retType": Type,
"effects": ["..."],
"body": Term }
Param/return types are explicit. The typechecker accepts the
declared Type::Fn shape, checks the body's type against retType,
and verifies that body effects are a subset of the declared lambda
effects (no row polymorphism in the MVP). Constructing a lambda is
pure; the act of calling picks up the declared effects, via the
existing App branch.
Codegen does textbook closure conversion:
-
Free-variable analysis.
collect_captureswalks the body skipping builtins (+,==, ...), the current module's top- level fns, and qualifiedprefix.defnames. The remainder are captures. Inner lambdas contribute their own free vars upward. -
Lift to thunk. For each lambda, generate a fresh
@ail_<m>_<def>_lam<id>(ptr %env, params...). State the body into a side buffer (the emitter'sbody/locals/counterare saved and reset, then restored). Captures and lambda params are pushed as named locals so the body lowering finds them. The thunk text goes into adeferred_thunksqueue and is appended after the parent fn's}— LLVM IR doesn't care about fn order. -
Pack at the use site. In the OUTER body emit:
%env = call ptr @malloc(i64 <8 * captures>) ; for each capture i: store at offset 8*i %clos = call ptr @malloc(i64 16) ; store thunk_ptr at offset 0, env at offset 8%closis the value returned by the Lam term. Its sig is registered in the sidetable so subsequent indirect calls work. -
Capture sigs propagate. A fn-typed capture (e.g. capturing a fn-typed param of an outer scope) keeps its FnSig in the thunk's sidetable, so the captured fn can still be indirect-called from inside the lambda.
Capture layout uses 8-byte slots regardless of LLVM type. Typed
load/store reads only the bytes it needs — wasted padding for i1
and i8 is fine at this scale.
Architecture self-check:
- Would I use this language now? Yes for substantially more cases.
let n = 3 in apply(\\x. x + n, 39)is the example I would have reached for in Iter 6 and bounced off. It now compiles and runs.map/fold/filterover user-supplied predicates are within reach — only the absence of polymorphism still forces author-side monomorphisation. - Did I think of everything? Hash stability checked manually:
examples/sum.ail.jsonproduced the same fn hashes (db33f57cb329935e,d9a916a0ed10a3d3) before and after Iter 8. Existing modules withoutTerm::Lamserialise bit-identically. ✓ - Consistency: DESIGN.md "What is not (yet) supported" rewritten
in the same edit. The Term schema gained
lam,ctor,matchrows that were already supported but had been omitted from the schema fragment. Now the doc is exhaustive for the supported language. - Visualisation:
ail describealready renders Lam terms (added pretty-printer rule), and the codegen IR forclosure.ail.jsonreads as a textbook closure-conversion lowering. - KISS check: I considered three alternatives and all were strictly worse — fat-pointer ABI (aggregate-passing concerns), full TIR layer (large rewrite), uniform heap pair without static-closure optimisation (regressed Iter 7 to one malloc per fn-value escape).
Tests: 49 green (was 48 after Iter 7). One new e2e:
closure_captures_let_n builds and runs examples/closure.ail.json
asserting "42". IR snapshot files refreshed for the per-fn adapter +
static-closure scaffold — only structural delta.
Plan iteration 9:
Two candidates, both real pain points:
-
Polymorphic inference. Make
Type::Forallactually work insynth— instantiate fresh type variables at each use site, allowlet id = \\x. x in (id 1, id true). This unblocks genericmap/fold/etc. without per-type clones. Probably small (~150 LOC in the typechecker; codegen already monomorphises by instantiation when it lowers the call). -
GC / region reclamation. Right now ADT boxes, lambda envs, and closure pairs all leak through the program's lifetime. A minimal mark-and-sweep over a tagged heap would let us run real programs. Bigger lift, ~400-600 LOC plus runtime support.
Leaning toward (1) for the next iteration: it's the smaller bite and the bigger expressivity unlock. (2) becomes acute only when someone tries to run an unbounded loop, which the current examples don't.
2026-05-07 — Iter 9 done: dogfood + ail run
Course-corrected from the Iter-8 plan. Polymorphism is the bigger
expressivity unlock on paper, but I hadn't actually proved that the
language was sufficient for "small but real" programs without it. So
Iter 9 became a dogfood iteration: write a non-trivial program
that exercises everything Iter 1-8 shipped, and use ail run /
errors / type-checker output as the user would. If something broke,
fix it. If nothing broke, document the boundary moved.
examples/list_map.ail.json:
type IntList = Nil | Cons Int IntList
map_int :: ((Int) -> Int, IntList) -> IntList
map_int(f, xs) = match xs {
Nil -> Nil
Cons(h, t) -> Cons(f(h), map_int(f, t))
}
print_list :: (IntList) -> Unit !IO
print_list(xs) = match xs {
Nil -> ()
Cons(h, t) -> let _ = do io/print_int(h) in print_list(t)
}
main = let xs = Cons 1 (Cons 2 (Cons 3 Nil)) in
print_list(map_int(\\x. x * 2, xs))
Result: nothing broke. Output 2\\n4\\n6\\n, exit 0. The full
pipeline (ail run) covers: ADTs with two ctors of different
arity; pattern matching with nested Var fields; recursion over
ADT; closures (with no captures here, so env is null but the
closure-pair plumbing still gets exercised); fn-typed parameters in
a top-level def; do io/... inside a match arm body, with let _
to sequence two effectful operations; effect propagation through
the call chain. This validates Iter 1-8 as a self-contained
foundation.
Friction surfaced: writing the AST by hand is tedious — the
JSON for this 4-def module is 200+ lines. That's not surprising
(the format is for LLMs, not humans), but it suggests an Iter 10
priority: a richer pretty-print form, or an ail snippet helper
for common boilerplate (mk_list_int, etc.). Not blocking; noted.
ail run (Iter 9b): Builds into a tempdir + execs the binary,
exit code passthrough. Saves a cd && ./bin step in the dogfood
loop. Tiny addition — Cmd::Build's body factored into a shared
build_to helper.
Architecture self-check:
- Would I use this language now? For self-contained Int-typed programs over recursive ADTs: yes. The list_map example is what I would have wanted to write since Iter 6 and bounced off repeatedly. It now compiles and runs without me adapting the source — the language is what its authors said it was, end to end.
- Did I think of everything? Two cracks observed during the
dogfood:
(Int)parens around single-param fn-types in pretty-print are visual noise. Cosmetic, can wait.let _ = do <effect> in <body>is the only way to sequence effects today. Working as intended given KISS, but a;operator (sequencing) would be cheap polish.
- Consistency: DESIGN.md CLI block + smoke-test list updated. Iter 8c invariant — "What is not (yet) supported" ≡ truth at end of latest iteration — held; no new pending items.
- KISS: Iter 9 added 0 LOC of language semantics. All gain came from validating the existing surface and a small CLI helper.
Tests: 50 green (was 49). New e2e
list_map_doubles_then_prints. No test for ail run itself —
build_and_run already exercises the equivalent path.
Plan iteration 10:
The dogfood revealed two real-but-not-blocking pain points and one big architectural gap. Candidates, ranked:
-
Polymorphic let-bindings with monomorphisation at codegen. Allows
let id = \\x. x in (id 1, id true)and ultimatelymap :: (a -> b) -> List a -> List b. The ground truth-ier answer for the "would I use it for X?" question, but a non-trivial pipeline change (typechecker→codegen needs to thread instantiation info to the call site). -
Sequencing operator
;and richer effect ergonomics. ATerm::Seq { lhs, rhs }(or compile sugar toLet { name: "_", value: lhs, body: rhs }) plus a small pretty-print update. Cheap, satisfying. -
GC. Heap reclamation for ADT boxes, lambda envs, closure pairs. Real architecture step. Becomes acute the moment someone writes a long-running loop; the current examples don't.
Tentative pick: (2) for the next sprint as a satisfying small polish, then (1) as Iter 11. (3) bides its time until a real program needs it.
2026-05-07 — Iter 10 done: Term::Seq sequencing
Followed the Iter 9 plan and shipped (2). New AST node
Term::Seq { lhs, rhs } with serde tag "seq". Semantics: evaluate
lhs (which must be Unit), discard the value, return rhs. Effects
from both sides accumulate.
This is sugar for let _ = lhs in rhs, but it's a first-class node
because:
- The pretty-print renders cleanly (
(seq lhs rhs)instead of borrowing theletform with a discard binding). - Diagnostics are sharper: a non-Unit lhs gets a "type mismatch"
error pointing at the seq site, not "binding
_had type X" at a let site. - Future tooling (effect inference visualisation, dataflow) can treat sequencing as a structural concept instead of a special- cased let.
Codegen is trivial: lower lhs (drop SSA), lower rhs (return).
Refactored examples/list_map.ail.json's print_list to use seq
instead of let _ = .... Output unchanged (2\\n4\\n6\\n); the
JSON shed a few lines and reads more honestly.
Architecture self-check:
- Would I use this language now? Same answer as Iter 9 (yes for small but real programs), but the seq node makes IO-heavy recursion read better — closer to "call this effect, then this one" instead of "bind this effect to nothing, then this one".
- Did I break anything? Hash stability check: existing examples
without
Term::Seqserialise identically; their fn hashes are unchanged.list_map.ail.json's hashes shifted as expected since its body changed. - KISS: +30 LOC across AST/pretty/check/codegen/walker. One unit test for the lhs-must-be-Unit rule. The dogfood example proves the e2e path.
Tests: 51 green (was 50). New seq_lhs_must_be_unit unit test
in ailang-check. Existing list_map e2e still passes after the
refactor.
Plan iteration 11:
Polymorphism, as queued in the Iter 9 plan. Concretely: HM-style unification + let-generalisation in the typechecker, monomorph- isation at codegen time. Touches the typechecker→codegen pipeline. Bigger commit than the recent stretch, will probably need to be phased (typechecker substitution machinery, then codegen specialisation, then docs).
2026-05-07 — Iter 11 done: deeper dogfood (insertion sort)
Pulled back from polymorphism for one more validation cycle before the architectural step. Polymorphism is a substantial pipeline change (typechecker substitution + codegen monomorphisation) and I wanted one more "small but real" program to confirm the existing foundation holds before disturbing it.
examples/sort.ail.json — insertion sort over IntList:
insert :: Int -> IntList -> IntList
insert(y, xs) = match xs {
Nil -> [y]
Cons(h, t) -> if y <= h then Cons(y, Cons(h, t))
else Cons(h, insert(y, t))
}
sort :: IntList -> IntList
sort(xs) = match xs {
Nil -> Nil
Cons(h, t) -> insert(h, sort(t))
}
print_list :: IntList -> Unit !IO // uses Iter 10 seq
main = print_list(sort([3,1,4,1,5,9,2,6,5,3,5]))
Result: typechecks first try, runs first try, prints
1 1 2 3 3 4 5 5 5 6 9 (each on its own line). 11-element input,
correct sorted output. The combination of recursive ADT pattern
match + comparison ops + branching + leaf recursion + IO
sequencing all worked end to end without the language tripping me
up. Iter 10's seq made print_list notably cleaner than the
let _ = ... form would have been.
Architecture self-check:
- Would I use this language now? For "small but real" monomorphic programs over Int, Bool, Unit, Str, and ADTs of those: confidently yes. Insertion sort writes out as the textbook recursion, no bookkeeping that the language couldn't do for me.
- Did I think of everything? The remaining wall is still
polymorphism. Sort over
IntListneeds hand-monomorphisation; a genericsort :: (a -> a -> Bool) -> List a -> List ais what the language eventually wants. No new architectural cracks surfaced from this dogfood. - Visualisation:
ail describe sort.ail.json sortreads the way I'd expect a sort definition to read, withIntListtypes inline and the recursive call rendered cleanly. - KISS: Iter 11 added 0 LOC of language semantics and 1 e2e test. The 250-line JSON for the example is verbose but mechanical — no friction once you accept that the JSON is the surface for LLM authors.
Tests: 52 green (was 51). New e2e
insertion_sort_orders_list. Pure addition; existing tests
untouched.
Plan iteration 12:
Now polymorphism. Two more dogfood programs would just keep producing the "the language is fine for monomorphic programs" result, which is already established. The real expressivity unlock — and the answer to "would I use it for X?" for X that actually needs generic data — is HM inference + let-generalisation
- monomorphisation. Phased plan:
12a. Typechecker: introduce a Subst (type variable substitution)
and unification. Thread through synth. At let, generalise
syntactic values (lambdas) — no value-restriction subtlety
needed yet, the MVP has no mutable refs.
12b. Codegen: at each polymorphic call site, the typechecker
records the instantiation. Codegen walks the AST a second
time per (def, instantiation) pair and emits a specialised
version with the type variables substituted by concrete
types in fn signatures.
12c. Docs + a polymorphic id test + a generic map :: (a -> b) -> List a -> List b rewrite of list_map.ail.json.
2026-05-07 — Iter 12a/b done: polymorphism reaches the binary
Skipped 12c's "polymorphic map" — without parameterised ADTs (which
the MVP doesn't have), the rewrite would still be over a concrete
IntList, defeating the purpose. So 12c becomes lighter: docs +
two new examples (poly_id, poly_apply) that prove polymorphism
end-to-end on primitive types and on fn-typed parameters. The big
test is whether I would use the language now for a poly-flavoured
program; the answer below.
12a — typechecker:
Type::Forall { vars, body } is now legal at top-level fn types.
Implementation is the textbook ML rule: peel the Forall when
checking the body (rigid vars go into Env.rigid_vars so
check_type_well_formed accepts them), instantiate fresh metavars
at every var-resolution site, unify on every formerly-expect_eq
edge.
The metavar encoding sidesteps an AST schema change: a metavar is
just Type::Var { name: "$m<id>" }. The $ prefix can't collide
with source identifiers, the JSON layout doesn't shift, and module
hashes stay bit-identical (verified: sum.ail.json keeps
db33f57cb329935e / d9a916a0ed10a3d3). I considered adding a
new Type::Meta variant under #[serde(skip)] but that would
have pulled hashing concerns into serde; the naming convention
keeps the AST untouched.
Subst is a flat BTreeMap<u32, Type>; unify is the standard
occurs-check version with effects compared as a set. Constants
still reject Forall outright; ADT fields still reject vars. No
let-generalisation: lambdas inside fn bodies are checked
monomorphically against their declared types — keeps the
implementation small and matches DESIGN.md's "top-level types
must always be explicitly annotated".
12b — codegen:
Direct calls to a polymorphic def get monomorphised on demand.
Each unique (def, instantiation) pair emits a specialised LLVM fn
with mangling @ail_<m>_<def>__<descriptor>. Descriptor scheme:
Int → I, Bool → B, Unit → U, Str → S, ADT Foo → FFoo,
Fn(a)→b → Fn_<a>__r_<b>. So id(42) and id(true) produce
@ail_poly_id_id__I and @ail_poly_id_id__B side by side.
Pass 1 of lower_workspace now splits fn-typed defs into mono
(module_user_fns, LLVM-typed FnSig as before) and poly
(module_polymorphic_fns, full FnDef). A unified
module_def_ail_types carries AILang types for both, used by
the codegen-side type tracker.
The hard part was getting AILang types at call sites. The typechecker has them but doesn't hand its annotations down (no TIR yet). I considered three paths:
- Typechecker sidetable keyed by AST node ids — would need to assign ids deterministically, brittle.
- Uniform representation (everything passes as ptr/i64) — contradicts CLAUDE.md's "performance is extremely important".
- Codegen replays the type derivation locally.
Picked (3). The trade-off is duplication (
synth_arg_typemirrors what the typechecker already did), but it's contained to a small recursive walk and uses the samelocals/extrasshadowing pattern. Worth it for the MVP — once a TIR stage materialises (it's still on the debt list), the duplication collapses into a single pass.
locals grew from 3-tuple to 4-tuple (name, ssa, llvm_type, ail_type). Six push sites updated mechanically. Lambda capture
metadata grew the same way. CtorRef got ail_fields so match
arm bindings inherit the AILang type.
The drain phase iterates until mono_queue is empty —
specialised bodies can themselves invoke polymorphic defs and
queue further entries. apply_subst_to_term substitutes rigid
vars in Term::Lam annotations (the only Term arm carrying
types).
Architecture self-check:
- Would I use this language now? For monomorphic programs:
yes (already established). For polymorphism over primitives
and fn-typed parameters: yes —
idandapplywrite out the way the textbook says they should, with no language-level bookkeeping leaking into the source. Thepoly_applyexample was particularly revealing: the closure-pair ABI (Iter 8a) composes cleanly with monomorphisation. Specialised body ofapply__I_Ikeepsfas a fn-typed local; the existing indirect-call path already handles the lower from there. - Did I think of everything? No, two known gaps:
- Polymorphic fn passed as a value (
let f = id in f(42)) fails in codegen —resolve_top_level_fnlooks inmodule_user_fnsonly. Adding this means emitting one closure-pair global per instantiation, possibly via the same drain pass. Defer. - Higher-rank polymorphism (
apply(id, 42)) tripsunify_for_substwhich doesn't handle Forall on the param side. Real higher-rank polymorphism is a substantial step and not on the near horizon — deferred to a later iter.
- Polymorphic fn passed as a value (
- Visualisation:
ail manifest poly_id.ail.jsonnow showsforall a. (a) -> acorrectly. The pretty-printer carriedType::Forallrendering since Iter 1; nothing to do. - KISS: +1 typechecker file edit (~430 LOC inserted, mostly Subst+unify+four tests), +1 codegen extension (~600 LOC inserted, mostly the drain path + helpers + locals widening). Two new examples, two new e2e tests. Could be smaller if I bit the bullet on TIR; not yet worth the upfront cost.
Tests: 58/58 (was 56/56). Added 4 typechecker unit tests in 12a, 2 e2e tests in 12b. Hash invariant holds.
Plan iteration 13 (queued, not started):
The natural next step depends on what I want to use the language for. Two candidates, in order of expected payoff:
13a. Parameterised ADTs — List a, Maybe a, etc. Without
these, polymorphism is half-useful: a generic map still
can't transform an IntList into a BoolList. ADT defs
would gain a vars: Vec<String> field; ctor field types
could mention them; codegen monomorphises ADT instances
just like fns. This is the bigger expressivity unlock.
13b. GC or arena — every ADT box, lambda env, and closure
pair currently leaks. For sort over an 11-element list,
fine. For anything longer-running, required. The current
lifetime model is "leak"; the right MVP is probably
bumpalloc per top-level fn invocation. Could be done
before parameterised ADTs but doesn't unlock new examples.
Leaning 13a — it's the more interesting architectural step and makes the "polymorphic map" rewrite from the original 12c plan finally meaningful.
2026-05-07 — Iter 13 done: parameterised ADTs reach the binary
Why now. End of Iter 12 left polymorphism half-useful: id
and apply worked, but every container was monomorphic
(IntList, Maybe_Int). A generic map :: forall a b. ((a) -> b, List a) -> List b was unwritable. 13 lifts that.
Three commits:
078262213a — schema (TypeDef.vars,Type::Con.args) + checker (substitution at ctor + match + arity validation incheck_fn).1631f6013b — codegen: per-use-site substitution of LLVM field types inlower_ctorandlower_match. No mono-queue for types — ctor code was already inlined at every use site, so 13b only had to thread substitution through, not invent a symbol scheme.synth_arg_typeforTerm::Ctornow returns concrete type-args, andllvm_type(Type::Var)is a hard error instead of a silentptrfallback (the latter was flagged by the architect review and is the most defensive single change in 13).<this>13c — DESIGN.md flipped (parameterised ADTs out of the gap list, into the supported list); two new example lines.
Hash invariant. Both new fields are
#[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Vec::is_empty")]. A new
regression test in crates/ailang-core/src/hash.rs deserialises
the actual examples/sum.ail.json and examples/list.ail.json
from disk and asserts db33f57cb329935e and b082192bd0c99202 —
the recorded pre-13a hashes. It's deliberately phrased against
the on-disk JSON rather than reconstructed code, so the test
fails if anyone resaves the examples in a way that drifts the
canonical bytes.
Architect-flagged debt I deliberately did NOT touch in 13:
is_static_calleereturns true for poly fns butresolve_top_level_fnonly consultsmodule_user_fns. A poly fn used as a value (let f = id in f(42)) passes the static check then surfaces asUnknownVar. Would need one closure-pair global per instantiation. Out of 13 scope; same hole that was queued at the end of Iter 12.- Triple source of truth for builtins (
builtins::install,builtins::list,codegen::builtin_ail_type/builtin_effect_op_ret). Every new operator costs three edits. Low interest today, escalates with every effect op. Worth a future tidy iter — not blocking expressivity. synth_arg_typeforTerm::Ifreturnssynth(then)only; forTerm::Match, the first arm. Masked today by the typechecker having already unified, but it's the kind of duplication that decays. Same fundamental cost as the absence of a TIR.
Architecture self-check.
- Would I use this language now? For polymorphism over
primitives, fn-typed values, AND parameterised containers —
yes. The
box.ail.jsonandmaybe_int.ail.jsonexamples read like the textbook says they should. No type-arg bookkeeping leaks into the source. - KISS. 13b was much smaller than I feared at the start of
the design phase: ~150 LOC in codegen, no new structures, no
mono-queue. The reason: ADT ctor code is already inlined.
The architect's recommendation to not mutate
ctor_indexbut deriveCtorRefper use site was the right call — preserved the static template, made the substitution local. - Did I think of everything? Two known gaps remain. (1)
Polymorphic ADTs as the type-arg of a polymorphic fn —
works today because
unify_for_substrecurses throughType::Con.args(added in 13a). (2) A polymorphic fn taking a polymorphic ADT and returning a different parameterised ADT (map : forall a b. ((a)->b, List a) -> List b) — should also work, but I haven't dogfooded it yet becauseList a-as-a-rewrite-of-list_mapwould need the schema bumps elsewhere (paramaterised list builder). Queued for Iter 14. - Visualisation.
ail manifest examples/box.ail.jsonshowstype Box :: forall a. MkBox(a)andfn unbox :: forall a. (Box<a>) -> a. The pretty-printer picked upargsandvarscleanly (Iter 13a).
Tests: 64/64 (was 58/58). Added: 1 hash-stability regression
(13a), 3 checker unit tests for parameterised ADTs (13a),
2 e2e tests over box.ail.json and maybe_int.ail.json (13b).
Process note (orchestration). First iter where I worked
strictly through the agents in /agents/: ailang-architect
ran a drift review on HEAD before 13b started; ailang-implementer
got a fixed brief that incorporated the architect's three
recommendations (don't mutate ctor_index, fix synth_arg_type
for Term::Ctor, harden llvm_type); 13c (this) is the
orchestrator's own work. The role split landed in 3df943d after
I caught myself doing implementer work on 13a directly. The
agents pay off in proportion to iter size — for 13b they were
clearly worth the round-trip; for 13a's checker work, marginal.
Plan iteration 14 (queued, not started):
Two candidates, in order of expected payoff:
14a. Polymorphic List a rewrite of list_map. Replaces
IntList with List a, rewrites list_map to return
List b, and lets the polymorphic-map version be the
dogfood smoke test. Pure exercise — should fall out of
13b — but worth the dogfood beat. Also: Maybe a used
in a non-trivial fn (e.g. find : forall a. ((a) -> Bool, List a) -> Maybe a).
14b. GC or arena. Same pitch as before: every ADT box,
lambda env, closure pair leaks. For box.ail.json and
maybe_int.ail.json, fine. For anything that allocates
in a loop, required. Bumpalloc per top-level fn
invocation is the natural MVP.
14c. Poly fn as value. Closes the asymmetry the architect
flagged; gates let f = id in f(42). One closure-pair
global per instantiation, emitted via the same mono-queue
drain path. Smaller surface than 14a/b.
Leaning 14a — the dogfood payoff for one iter of polish is
high, and Maybe-in-a-real-fn is a missing piece I haven't
exercised yet. 14b stays second; 14c is a candidate if I want
a small palate cleanser.
Iter 13d — rustdoc polish for ailang-core + new ailang-docwriter agent
User triggered: ran cargo doc --open for fun and reported
that the rendered docs were thin — crate headers existed,
but pub items had no /// strings, there were no # Examples
sections, and intra-doc links were missing. Internal references
showed up as prose ("see Builtins") rather than as clickable
links. Two stale [Builtins] and [code] warnings had been
bleeding into every cargo doc invocation since Iter 6 or so.
Recurring task → new agent. Wrote agents/ailang-docwriter.md
with a tight mandate: rustdoc only, no API changes, no edits in
docs/ or agents/, three verification gates (rustdoc clean,
build green, tests green incl. doctests). Updated
agents/README.md. Updated DESIGN.md item 6 of "Verification
and correctness" to make rustdoc cleanliness a project-wide
invariant rather than an iter-local cleanup.
First mission: ailang-core only. The foundation crate every
other crate depends on — biggest reader-leverage per diff. The
agent rewrote the crate root so a newcomer learns: what core
owns, where it sits in the pipeline (core → check →
codegen → ail), the central invariant (canonical JSON is
deterministic, hashes content-addressed, schema = ailang/v0),
and the entry points. Module roots in ast.rs, canonical.rs,
hash.rs, pretty.rs, workspace.rs got the same treatment.
Every pub struct / enum / variant / fn / const got a ///
string. The Iter-13a additions (TypeDef.vars, Type::Con.args)
got an explicit backwards-compat note that points back to the
hash-stability regression test.
# Examples blocks landed where they shorten understanding
(canonical::to_bytes, def_hash, Workspace), all marked
ignore so the workspace doctest run stays cheap (3 ignored,
0 run, 0 failed). The two stale broken-link warnings in
ailang-check got prose-only fixes — out-of-scope for this
iter conceptually, but a one-line fix per file means rustdoc
is now globally clean.
Findings reported by the docwriter (judgement deferred to me; none made it into the diff):
Term::Lam.param_tys(JSON:paramTypes) is positionally paired withTerm::Lam.params: Vec<String>. Naming hints at the convention but a cold reader has to deduce it. Not fixing: renaming would touch the schema, breaks every hash. The///string makes the convention explicit, which is enough.Type::Varis overloaded: source-level rigid vars and checker metavars ($m<id>) share the same variant. A reader ofcorealone sees no hint of the metavar half — it's documented inailang-check's lib doc instead. Not fixing: splitting the variant would balloon the schema and invalidate every hash. Acceptable as long ascheck's lib doc explains it (it does, post-13d).Def::Type(TypeDef)versus the type-expression enumTypein the same module: name collision is real but unavoidable without renamingType(which would touch every crate). The///strings now disambiguate at point of contact.
Process note (orchestration). Second iter where I worked
strictly through agents (after 13b). The docwriter brief was
written from the diagnostic in this conversation, not from a
DESIGN-doc design pass — there was no architecture decision to
make, just a discipline gap to close. That's the right shape
for a docwriter: low-judgement, repeatable, runs after every
iter that touches public surface. Cost ≈ 25 tool uses for ~390
LOC of doc additions across 9 files; smaller-grain than
ailang-implementer runs typically are.
Tests: 64/64 unit + e2e (unchanged), 3 ignored doctests
(new). cargo doc --no-deps: 0 warnings (was 2). cargo build --workspace green. cargo test --workspace green.
Plan iteration 13e/13f (queued, not started). Two natural follow-ups for the docwriter:
13e. ailang-check rustdoc: type-checker is the next
biggest crate by pub-surface and the most algorithmically
dense. Rigid/metavar split, Forall instantiation, the
match-arm exhaustiveness logic, the Iter-13a substitution
machinery — all of it benefits more from prose explanation
than core did.
13f. ailang-codegen + ail CLI rustdoc: codegen is dense
but mechanical (mangling, ABI, block tracking); the CLI
is mostly clap derive macros. Lower payoff per LOC of doc
than 13e but rounds out the warning-free invariant across
the whole workspace.
After 13d there's no urgency on 13e/f — cargo doc is already
warning-free. They're "polish iterations to be slotted in
between feature iters when context budget is short". 14a
(List a rewrite) remains the next-feature default.
Iter 13e — rustdoc polish for ailang-check
Second docwriter mission. Same mandate as 13d, applied to the
typechecker crate. lib.rs (1922 LOC) had a strong crate root
already — covers HM-with-effects, top-level forall, the
rigid-vs-metavar split, the $m<id> encoding — but its pub
surface (the Env struct, CheckError + 24 variants,
CheckedModule, CtorRef, the check_module entry point) was
mostly undocumented. builtins.rs had a one-line module
header and zero /// strings on EffectOpSig or install.
diagnostic.rs had a strong module header (lists every stable
diagnostic code) but Diagnostic, Severity, and the
construction helpers were undocumented.
Agent added 188 LOC of pure rustdoc across the three files; no
non-doc lines changed (verified by filtering the diff). Each
CheckError variant now carries the AST term/type that
triggers it and the stable kebab-case code it maps to. Env
fields (globals, effect_ops, types, module_globals,
current_module) got individual /// strings that name the
invariants — most importantly that module_globals includes
the current module, which the agent flagged as undocumented at
field level (now fixed). Crate-root prose got an upgraded
intra-doc link to [check_module]; super:: reference in
diagnostic.rs rewritten to crate:: (cosmetic, but the
canonical form).
Findings reported (judgement deferred to me):
Envispubwith all-pubfields butEnv::newis private and there's no public builder — external callers can only construct via field-by-field literal, which is fragile if a field is added later. Not fixing: changing this is an API decision, not a doc one. Worth raising next time we touch the crate's public surface deliberately.CheckError::CtorArityandCheckError::ArityMismatchboth serialize to the public diagnostic codearity-mismatch. The///strings now flag the collision per-variant; tooling that consumes the diagnostic JSON sees only the merged code and that's intentional from the iter-5b vintage. Not fixing.DiagnosticandSeverityare reachable both via the crate re-export and viacrate::diagnostic::*because thediagnosticmodule is itselfpub. Rustdoc renders both pages; harmless but slightly noisy. Not fixing: the re-export is the documented entry point and we don't want to hide the module.
Process note. Same shape as 13d: I wrote a brief naming the deficiencies (numbers of pub items, which files had thin roots), the agent did the doc additions inside its mandate, the orchestrator-side work was authoring DESIGN/JOURNAL and verifying the diff. Cost ≈ 32 tool uses for 188 LOC of doc across 3 files — denser than 13d (more sentences per pub item because the typechecker invariants need explicit articulation), but the per-LOC payoff for a future reader is also higher.
Tests: 64/64 unit + e2e (unchanged), 3 ignored doctests
(unchanged). cargo doc --no-deps: 0 warnings (was 0; the
agent introduced 4 transient broken-link warnings during the
work and resolved all of them before reporting done). cargo build --workspace green. cargo test --workspace green.
Plan 13f / 14a unchanged. 13f (ailang-codegen + ail
CLI) is the natural next polish iter; 14a (List a rewrite of
list_map) remains the next-feature default. Auto-mode is on,
so I'll continue into 13f directly unless context budget
pressures a switch.
Iter 13f — rustdoc polish for ailang-codegen + ail CLI
Combined docwriter mission. Codegen has a small public
surface (only 3 top-level pub items: CodegenError enum +
7 variants, emit_ir, lower_workspace); the CLI is a
binary with zero pub items, so the only useful rustdoc is
the module header. One agent run, both files.
What landed (148 LOC of doc additions, no non-doc lines changed, verified by filtering the diff):
ailang-codegencrate root got intra-doc-link upgrades ([emit_ir],[lower_workspace],[CodegenError::MissingEntryMain]) and a precondition sentence — both entry points assume their input has already passed the typechecker; codegen does not call the checker itself.- Every
CodegenErrorvariant got a///string naming the AST term/condition that triggers it. Same shape asCheckErrorpost-13e, so the two error enums now read similarly and a reader can grep across them.Internalis flagged in its doc as a catch-all that covers ~30 invariant-violation sites. emit_irandlower_workspacenow make the single-vs-multi-module split explicit and cross-link to each other.ail/main.rsmodule header expanded from a 5-line stub to a full subcommand list with one-liners (manifest,render,describe,deps,check,emit-ir,build,run,builtins,diff,workspace), theclang-on-PATH prerequisite forbuild/run, the design-intent paragraph about each subcommand being narrowly scoped for LLM consumption (already partly there), and an explicit "nopubitems,--helptext comes from clap" note for anyone who lands here from rustdoc.
Findings reported (judgement deferred to me):
CodegenError::Internal(String)is a single opaque catch-all for ~30 distinct invariant-violation sites (mono-queue desync, ctor-index miss, lambda-env shape, ...). Tests can only substring-match on it. Not fixing: splitting is a test-ergonomics decision, not a doc one. Worth raising the next time codegen tests get a serious rewrite.emit_irsynthesises an internalWorkspacewithroot_dir = ".". No codegen path readsroot_dirtoday, so this is harmless; if a future feature reachesroot_dirfrom codegen, the assumption surfaces. Not fixing: the agent flagged it correctly as "would change behaviour, out of scope".
Process note: brief drift caught by the agent. I told the
docwriter the CLI had nine subcommands; it found eleven
(Deps and Diff were missing from my brief, which was
written off a head -40 of the source). Agent silently
corrected and flagged the drift in its findings. Useful
counter-pressure to the orchestrator pattern: my survey was
sloppy and the agent did not propagate the sloppiness into
the doc. This is one of the things sub-agents are good at and
why I keep delegating even on small jobs.
Tests: 64/64 unit + e2e (unchanged), 3 ignored doctests
(unchanged). cargo doc --no-deps: 0 warnings. Also verified
under RUSTDOCFLAGS='-D rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links' per
agent report. cargo build --workspace green. cargo test --workspace green.
Workspace-wide rustdoc invariant achieved. All four
crates (ailang-core, ailang-check, ailang-codegen,
ail) now have:
- crate-root
//!that names ownership, position in pipeline, and entry points; - module-root
//!on every file with non-trivial content; ///on every public item (struct, enum, variant, fn, field, const) that names the contract, not just the type;- intra-doc links wherever prose previously referred to another item by name.
DESIGN.md item 6 ("rustdoc cleanliness") is now load-bearing
across the whole workspace, not just core. The
ailang-docwriter agent's job from here is maintenance:
run after any iter that adds public surface, not full sweeps.
Next. 14a is now unblocked: write a polymorphic list_map
that uses List a (Iter-13a parameterised ADTs) and Maybe a,
then extend an existing demo program (hello_print or one of
the dogfood sources) to call it end-to-end. That exercises
the parameterised-ADT pipeline through type-check, codegen,
and runtime — the missing piece in 13a/b/c was that the
feature shipped but no real program used it. If context
budget at the start of 14a is tight, alternative is 14b
(GC/arena scaffolding) or 14c (poly fn as value); both have
real design questions that need an orchestrator design pass
first, so 14a stays the default.
Iter 14a — polymorphic List a end-to-end + monomorphisation bug fixed
The dogfood payoff for parameterised ADTs (13a/b/c). Prior
to this iter, the only programs exercising the feature were
box.ail.json (single MkBox(42) round-trip) and
maybe_int.ail.json (single or_else call). That is a thin
slice — neither program builds a recursive parameterised ADT
nor calls a polymorphic higher-order fn. 14a closes that gap
with data List a + map : forall a b. ((a) -> b, List<a>) -> List<b> recursive, then prints the result.
Three-agent run (tester → debugger → no implementer needed):
-
Tester wrote
examples/list_map_poly.ail.json(5 defs:List,inc,map,print_list,main) and a new e2e testlist_map_poly_inc_then_printsthat asserts stdout["2", "3", "4"]. Typecheck passed, build crashed:internal: monomorphisation: var \a` bound to two distinct types. Tester correctly stopped — fixture encodes the contract; bug is in the compiler — and reported with a hypothesis (recursion / shared substitution slot inmap`). -
Debugger refuted the hypothesis with a non-recursive repro (
Cons(7, Nil)triggers the same crash withoutmapin the picture at all). Real cause was much smaller: insynth_arg_type(codegen, ~line 2087) forTerm::Ctor, any type var of the parent ADT that the ctor's args couldn't pin was filled withType::unit()as a placeholder. For nullary ctors of a parameterised ADT (Nil : List<a>,None : Maybe<a>) that placeholder leaked upward. Inside a parent likeCons(Int, Nil) : List<a>,unify_for_substwould walkcref.ail_fields = [Var{a}, Con{List,[Var{a}]}]against[Int, Con{List,[Unit]}], binda = Intfrom the head, then collide witha = Unitfrom the tail. The recursivemapfixture surfaced it because it is the first program to nest a nullary ctor of a parameterised ADT inside a parent ctor — the existing 13b regressions never did. The tester's hypothesis was reasonable from the symptom but wrong on mechanism; refuting it via a smaller repro is exactly the discipline the debugger role is for. -
Fix (
crates/ailang-codegen/src/lib.rs, +30/-9 LOC, no new variant, no API change):- Replace
Type::unit()placeholder with a synth-only wildcardType::Var { name: "$u" }. The$uprefix is a reserved-namespace convention that mirrors the checker's$m<id>for instantiation metavars — same trick (source-level identifiers can't start with$), same goal (extra semantics without schema change). unify_for_substshort-circuits on a$u-prefixed arg-side var: accept without binding, let a sibling arg pin the type var instead. Param-side semantics untouched.derive_substitution's "var not pinned" check still fires for genuinely under-determined calls (those would have failed typechecking, so codegen never sees them, but the safety net stands).
- Replace
Tests: 25/25 e2e (was 24, +1 new poly test). All five
named regressions stayed green: list_map_doubles_then_prints,
parameterised_box_round_trip, parameterised_maybe_match,
polymorphic_id_at_int_and_bool, polymorphic_apply_with_fn_param.
Insertion sort still green. cargo doc --no-deps: 0 warnings
(workspace invariant from 13d/e/f preserved). cargo build --workspace green.
Process note: tester→debugger→done in one iter. No implementer dispatch needed — the debugger's mandate covers "propose and apply a minimally invasive fix" once the diagnosis is solid. 30 LOC across two sites in one file is inside the role's scope (the role doc says "stop and report" only on >50 LOC across multiple files). The orchestrator-side work was the design (the source program), the scoped briefs, and verification. This is the cleanest agent-flow shape so far: each agent did exactly its job, the tester's wrong hypothesis didn't propagate because the debugger tested it, and the orchestrator never wrote compiler code.
Findings flagged (judgement deferred, not fixed):
CodegenError::Internal(the catch-all string variant the docwriter flagged in 13f) is now used by one more invariant — the$ushort-circuit could in principle be reached by a malformed input; it's currently silent because typecheck rejects under-determined calls upstream. Worth splitting into typed variants the next time codegen tests get a real rewrite. (Same finding as 13f, now reinforced by another use site.)- The
$u/$mreserved-prefix convention ($ufor codegen synth wildcards,$m<id>for checker metavars) is undocumented as a project-wide naming rule. Two prefixes is fine; if a third appears, this should be promoted to a DESIGN.md note.
Next. Parameterised ADTs are now genuinely usable for
real programs. The standard library starter set (an
examples/std_* series with List, Maybe, Either,
basic combinators length, filter, fold, concat)
becomes worthwhile in a way it wasn't pre-14a — that's a
plausible 14b alternative, smaller than GC/arena, and would
itself surface more dogfood bugs. The original 14b
(GC/arena) and 14c (poly fn as value) remain on the queue
but have not had a design pass.
Iter 14b — design pass for the authoring surface
User redirected the project at the iter boundary. I had been about to write a stdlib in JSON-AST form; user pushed back: do I really program best in JSON, given the language is supposed to be the one I'm most accurate in? Honest answer was no — JSON was rationalisation. The constraint added in this iter:
"Die Syntax sollte gut formalisierbar sein, damit man auch einem fremden LLM eine Spec geben kann, die es dann fehlerfrei befolgt."
That single sentence ruled out about half the design space: anything with operator precedence (precedence is the #1 thing an LLM gets wrong when handed a spec, because it requires building a parse-tree mental model rather than just following production rules), anything with semantic indentation, anything with maximal-munch lexing or context-sensitive reductions.
What remains is roughly: S-expressions, or dialects close to S-expressions. Decision 6 in DESIGN.md captures the constraints in priority order, sketches three candidate forms (A: tagged S-expression, B: indented record-style, C: pretty-printer-as- source), and picks (A) as the first attempt with explicit rollback to (C) if (A) hurts authoring more than it helps.
Key shape of (A): every AST node has a unique head keyword.
No case-disambiguation rule (no "capitalised head means ctor").
Bare atoms in positional slots get their sort from the parent
slot (inside (con NAME args...) second-and-later positions
are types; inside (app HEAD args...) first position is a term;
etc.). To construct a value with a ctor, write
(term-ctor TypeName CtorName args...) explicitly. To match,
(pat-ctor CtorName fields...). The capitalisation/case of an
identifier carries no semantic weight to the parser.
This rules out the silent-error class "I forgot to capitalise
Cons and it parsed as a function call" — which I had been
relying on case-conventions to prevent in the JSON form too,
but only by hand-discipline. With explicit tags the discipline
becomes a parse rule.
Empirical test (this iter). Hand-encoded three examples in
form (A) as examples/*.ailx:
hello.ailx — 5 LOC (was JSON: 36 pretty / 21 canonical)
box.ailx — 25 LOC (was JSON: 160 pretty / 88 canonical)
list_map_poly.ailx — 50 LOC (was JSON: 394 pretty / 230 canonical)
Roughly 4–8× line reduction, ~4× character reduction. Bigger gains on bigger programs (overhead is proportional to AST depth, not to program size, so the form scales well). All three mapped unambiguously to AST nodes by inspection — no ambiguities surfaced during writing that the spec didn't already cover.
Two small lex/grammar issues I discovered while writing and folded back into DESIGN.md before committing:
- Operator idents like
+,==,<=. Initial spec had a word-shaped[A-Za-z_]...regex; that excluded operators. Fix: lexer recognises only(/)/whitespace as delimiters. Every other maximal token is classified by first character (digit ⇒ integer,"⇒ string, else ⇒ ident).+,42,io/print_int,==all become single ident or integer tokens with no special rule. - Bool literals. Bare
true/falseare reserved in term context; outside term context they would be ill-formed anyway. Unit is explicit:(lit-unit).
Files touched:
docs/DESIGN.md— Decision 6 added (~140 lines), with constraints, three candidates, first-choice rationale, and an implementation outline for Iter 14c.examples/hello.ailx,examples/box.ailx,examples/list_map_poly.ailx— three design exhibits. Not parseable yet (header comment says so).docs/JOURNAL.md— this entry.
Tests: None new. Existing 25/25 e2e + 3 ignored doctests
unchanged (this iter is paper, not code). cargo doc --no-deps
0 warnings (workspace invariant from 13d/e/f preserved).
Process note: orchestration with explicit licence to be wrong. User said "du darfst auch ausprobieren und dich irren (und es dann rückgängig machen). Wir wollen das beste Design für den propagierten Zweck." That changes the cost model for design iteration: I should optimise for information per iter, not for correctness on first commit. So I committed form (A) as a working hypothesis with a documented rollback path to form (C), rather than design-by-committee until I was sure.
Plan 14c (next).
- New crate
ailang-surfacewith a small PEG parser → existingailang-core::asttypes. No new AST nodes. - Round-trip test gate: every existing
examples/*.ail.jsongets a sibling*.ailxwritten by hand or by an AST→surface emitter; the test parses the surface, canonises to JSON, and asserts hash-equivalence to the original. If a single fixture loses its hash, the form does not ship. - CLI:
ail parse <file.ailx> -o <file.ail.json>. Symmetric to existingail render. - If round-trip works for all current fixtures, mark form (A)
confirmed and start the stdlib in
.ailxdirectly. If it fails, document why in JOURNAL and try (C).
Plan 14d (after 14c). First stdlib module: std_list.ailx
with length, filter, fold, concat, reverse, head,
tail. Each combinator is a fresh test vector for codegen and
for the still-young parameterised-ADT pipeline. Written in the
new surface from day one — no JSON authoring of stdlib.
Iter 14c — ailang-surface parser + pretty-printer ships
Implements Decision 6's form (A). New crate ailang-surface
(~1843 LOC across lex.rs, parse.rs, print.rs, lib root,
plus tests) ships as a strictly additive producer of
ailang-core::ast::Module values. ailang-check and
ailang-codegen were not modified — projection-agnostic, as
the architectural pin requires.
Implementer dispatch went clean. Brief gave the EBNF, the
fixtures to round-trip, the lexer rule, and the architectural
constraints. Implementer hand-wrote a recursive-descent parser
(one Rust fn per EBNF production), a deterministic pretty-
printer, an integration test that runs the round-trip gate on
every fixture, and the ail parse CLI subcommand. No
parser-combinator dependency. No AST-shape changes.
Two AST-driven form refinements that were not in the 14b sketch (both folded into DESIGN.md Decision 6 by the implementer before commit):
lam-termhad to carryparam_tys,ret_ty, andeffectsbecause the AST'sTerm::Lamstores parallel typed-param data. Production became(lam (params (typed x Int) ...) (ret T) (effects ...) (body ...)). Same shape-style as the rest of the form; no new lex rules.import-clausehad to admitOption<String>aliases. Production became(import name (as alias)?)withasas a bare ident token. No new lex rules.
The 14b 30-production budget held: implementer reports ~28 named productions in the parser. Constraint 1 (formalisable for foreign LLM) intact.
Verification gates, all green:
cargo build --workspace: 0 warnings, finished.cargo test --workspace: 76 tests pass (was 64; +9 unit tests inailang-surface, +2 integration tests intests/round_trip.rs, +1 e2e regression preserved). All 17examples/*.ail.jsonfixtures round-trip byte-identical throughprint → parse → canonical JSON; 3 hand-written.ailxexhibits parse to canonical JSON byte-identical to their.ail.jsonsiblings.cargo doc --no-deps: 0 warnings (workspace invariant from 13d/e/f preserved; new crate's rustdoc landed correctly with crate-root//!plus allpubitems documented).
Manual smoke test (orchestrator-side after agent reported
done): ail parse <file.ailx> -o <file.ail.json> followed
by ail run <file.ail.json> for all three exhibits:
hello.ailx → "Hello, AILang."
box.ailx → "42"
list_map_poly.ailx → "2\n3\n4"
End-to-end pipeline form (A) → AST → typecheck → codegen → clang → binary works on all three.
Important non-issue. examples/*.ail.json fixtures on
disk are hand-formatted JSON with non-canonical key order;
the parser produces canonical (lex-sorted) JSON. Diff at
the file-byte level is not zero. Diff at the canonical-byte
level is zero — which is the only thing that matters per
Decision 1, since hashing uses canonical form. The
round-trip test gates on canonical bytes, not file bytes.
This is correct behaviour; flagged here so a future reader
who runs diff doesn't think the surface is broken.
Files created:
crates/ailang-surface/Cargo.tomlcrates/ailang-surface/src/lib.rs(~40 LOC, rustdoc heavy)crates/ailang-surface/src/lex.rs(~264 LOC)crates/ailang-surface/src/parse.rs(~1041 LOC, one fn per production)crates/ailang-surface/src/print.rs(~371 LOC)crates/ailang-surface/tests/round_trip.rs(~128 LOC)
Files modified:
Cargo.toml(workspace) —ailang-surfacemember + workspace dep.Cargo.lock— refresh.crates/ail/Cargo.toml—ailang-surfacedep.crates/ail/src/main.rs— newParse { path, output }subcommand (~36 LOC).docs/DESIGN.md— form refinements appendix to Decision 6.examples/list_map_poly.ailx— implementer added doc strings to match the JSON original (was a 14b design exhibit, not byte-aligned).
Known debt: none reported. ailang-check /
ailang-codegen untouched per the architectural pin.
Plan 14d (next, queued). With form (A) now ergonomic
and round-trip-verified, the std-lib path opens up. First
target: examples/std/std_list.ailx with length,
filter, fold (left and right), concat, reverse,
head, tail. Each combinator a fresh test vector for
the parameterised-ADT pipeline (which 14a opened end-to-
end). Authored in form (A); the resulting .ail.json is
what tests consume. If 14d surfaces more codegen bugs in
the parameterised-ADT path (it likely will — 14a found
one already), debugger handles them inline.
The 14b/c form-A hypothesis has held under the empirical
test of round-tripping every existing fixture. The
documented rollback to form (C) is now off the table for
this iter cycle, though the architectural pin keeps it
open for future replacement of ailang-surface should
the form prove inadequate at stdlib scale.
Language-completion sequence (14d → 14f, then stdlib in 15a)
User redirected at the 14d boundary: write the language to "finished" before starting on a stdlib. Reasoning: authoring a stdlib in an unfinished language wastes work — each gap discovered later forces a rewrite of code already written. The user also confirmed: no schema version bump needed. AILang has exactly one consumer (me), so version ceremony for compatibility management is pure overhead. Edit AST and fixtures in place; pin new hashes where the hash regression test demands it.
Updated planning sequence:
- 14d — remove
Term::Ifredundancy. Pure subtraction. - 14e — explicit tail-call annotation (
tailflag onTerm::App/Term::Do,musttailin codegen, tail-position verifier in checker). - 14f — memory management. Currently every ADT allocation
leaks. Likely Boehm conservative GC (
GC_malloc+-lgc) for minimum surface change; design pass first. - 15a — first stdlib module (
std_list).
Deferred (not stdlib-blocking; can land later without
rewriting code that already exists): records/tuples (use
ADT pairs), nested patterns (use pyramid match), local
recursive let (hoist to top level).
Iter 14d — Term::If removed
Subtraction iter. Term::If { cond, then, else_ } was
semantically a subset of Term::Match on Bool. CLAUDE.md
forbids redundancies; two AST nodes for the same operation
was an authoring decision with no semantic content and a
duplicate codegen path.
The migration shape was the canonical one named in the brief:
(if c a b) → (match c (case (lit-bool true) a) (case _ b))
Wildcard arm satisfies the existing primitive-needs-wildcard
rule. A future iter may upgrade exhaustiveness to recognise
true+false as covering Bool without a wildcard, but the
wildcard form works with the current checker and that was
enough for 14d.
Implementer dispatch went clean with one documented
deviation. Removing the Term::If codegen path was not
sufficient on its own: the existing match codegen rejects
i1 (Bool) scrutinees and Pattern::Lit patterns — both
of which the migration shape requires. The implementer
added a tightly-scoped lower_bool_match helper (~95 LOC)
that handles only the two-arm Bool migration shape
((lit-bool true) -> A | _ -> B or its mirror), errors on
anything else, and emits the same br i1/phi IR the old
Term::If path emitted. No generalisation of the
ADT-match codegen.
The deviation was the right call. Lesson for future subtraction iters: when removing a specialised AST node, the codegen for the migration target may need a small extension. Pre-emptively scope this in the brief next time.
Diff size: 13 files, +286/-221 LOC. Net +65 LOC across the workspace, but the AST got smaller (one variant gone), the form-(A) grammar got smaller (one production gone), and the typechecker got smaller (one branch gone). Codegen got slightly larger because of the bool-match helper, but the alternative was reusing the existing match path and generalising it — which would have been a bigger and riskier change.
Hash deltas (intentional, per Decision 7):
| def | before | after |
|---|---|---|
sum.sum |
db33f57cb329935e |
7f5fe7f72c63a9fd |
sort.insert |
697fcb9f30f8633a |
07ff6ee7db17565d |
max3.max |
65c45d6a45dd0a72 |
2aa1576f3fbf5b3d |
max3.max3 |
624b14429bf302f5 |
c452ec2e36c0af27 |
Untouched defs (e.g. sum.main, all sort.* except
insert, sort.IntList, sort.print_list, max3.main)
keep bit-identical hashes. That's the canary that the
canonical-JSON byte format was not perturbed — only the
migrated bodies changed identity.
Verification: 76/76 tests green (unchanged count; no
new tests in this iter, by design — subtraction). Manual
smoke: sum → 55, max3 → 17, sort → ordered list.
Identical to pre-migration stdout for all three. cargo doc --no-deps 0 warnings.
Tail-call survey from the implementer (gold finding, informs 14e). While reading the migrated fixtures the implementer surveyed tail positions. Result:
print_list(in bothsort.ail.jsonandlist_map_poly.ail.json): the recursive call is the rhs of aseqwhich is the body of a match arm — already in tail position. TCO would convert these to actual loops.mainchains: the outer call is in tail position; inner calls are not.insert,sort,map: the recursive calls are arguments to aConsctor construction (e.g.Cons (f h) (map f t)). NOT in tail position. Constructor-blocking is the standard ML/Haskell case where TCO does not apply without a CPS transform or an accumulator-form rewrite.
Implications for 14e. Adding a tail flag to
Term::App/Do will work for print_list-style
recursions and for terminal call chains, but will not
help the map/sort/insert-style ctor-blocked
recursions. Those need either an accumulator-form rewrite
in the source program (the standard ML/Haskell move) or a
CPS transform (much more intrusive). 14e ships only the
annotation + verification; accumulator forms become an
authoring pattern in the stdlib, not a compiler feature.
This sharpens what 14e can promise: tail-call wins
will be visible in print_list-style terminal-recursion
patterns; map/sort style stays stack-bounded by depth,
which makes 14f (GC) the more important iter for handling
long lists than 14e by itself.
Iter 14e — explicit, verified tail calls
Decision 8 ships. Term::App and Term::Do carry a tail: bool
flag (serde-default false, skip-when-false in serialisation).
A new verify_tail_positions typecheck pass walks each fn body
and Lam body with an is_tail_context: bool threaded down per
the standard Scheme rules, rejecting any tail: true call that
sits outside tail position. Codegen emits musttail call for
marked App calls.
Hash deltas (intentional, only the migrated calls):
| def | hash before | hash after |
|---|---|---|
list_map_poly.print_list |
unchanged 14c value | new |
sort.print_list |
unchanged 14d value | new |
All other defs across all 18 fixtures kept bit-identical hashes.
This is the canary for the skip_serializing_if = "is_false"
serde rule: an unmarked App/Do serialises identically to its
pre-14e form, so untouched defs cannot drift.
Tests: 79/79 (was 76, +3). New tests:
tail_call_in_non_tail_position_is_rejected(check unit) — asserts the diagnostic fires on a deliberately-misplacedtail: truecall (e.g. as aConsarg).tail_call_in_tail_position_is_accepted(check unit) — asserts the verifier accepts the canonicalprint_listshape.iter14e_print_list_recursion_emits_musttail(e2e IR-grep) — buildslist_map_poly, dumps IR, asserts the recursive call site usesmusttail call. This is the only direct evidence that the AST flag actually reaches LLVM.
IR-snapshot evidence at the recursive site of
print_list after migration:
%v7 = musttail call i8 @ail_list_map_poly_print_list(ptr %v6)
ret i8 %v7
musttail followed immediately by ret of the same SSA value —
LLVM's terminator rule satisfied. Smoke: list_map_poly →
2/3/4, insertion_sort_orders_list → identical sorted list.
Behavior unchanged; only the calling shape did.
Two implementer deviations (called out, both reasonable):
-
tail-dofalls back totail call, notmusttail. LLVMmusttailrequires identical caller/callee return types. AILang IO ops dispatch through runtime helpers (printf/puts) returningi32, while AILang'sUnitlowers toi8. Cross-typemusttailwould be rejected by the verifier. SoTerm::Dowithtail: truelowers totail call(the LLVM optimisation hint, not the guarantee), thenret i8 0. No fixture currently usestail-do, so the path is implemented but not exercised end-to-end. Proper fix: change runtime helper signatures to returni8. Punted; not blocking. -
block_terminatedplumbing in codegen. Atail-app/tail-doemitsmusttail call ... ret ...directly and setsself.block_terminated = true. Surrounding code (match-arm phi construction, fn-body trailing-ret, lambda-thunk trailing-ret) checks the flag and skips the fall-through emit. When every match arm is a tail call, the join block is omitted entirely. This was unavoidable to keep the IR well-formed — adding a secondretafter amusttail call+retwould be a verifier error. The flag is a small piece of state but it's the right shape for "the current basic block has been definitively terminated by a sub-emission".
Form (A) at constraint ceiling. Two new productions
(tail-app-term, tail-do-term) bring the count to ~30, which
is exactly the constraint-1 budget. Future productions need to
either retire something or accept an explicit budget rebalancing
in DESIGN.md.
GC notes from the implementer (informs 14f).
- Allocations cluster in
lower_ctor(~line 850 of codegen). Everyterm-ctordoesmalloc(8 + 8 * n). Inprint_listwe allocate nothing per recursion (just match + read fields + recurse); allocations come frommap, frommain's list-building Cons chain, and from any other user code that builds ADTs. - Lambda envs and closure pairs allocate too (
lower_lambda). Closure pair:malloc(16). Env block:malloc(env_size). Direct-application closures (the common case for HOF args) could be arena'd cleanly because the closure dies after the call returns. Stored or returned closures escape. - Tail recursion does NOT reduce allocation pressure, only
stack depth. For
print_list-style recursions there's no allocation to begin with, so the win is purely stack-bounded. Formap-style ctor-blocked recursions, each step allocates one newConsbox — that's where allocation-side work pays off. - The "obviously safe" arena boundary is a fn whose return
type contains no boxed ADT (i.e. returns
Int/Bool/Unit/Stronly). All ADT boxes allocated inside such a fn cannot escape; an arena freed at fn return is sound by construction. Most current fixtures violate this —map,sortreturn ADTs — so a per-fn-arena scheme alone won't carry. Need a heap with GC for escaping allocations.
This narrows 14f's design space: probably Boehm conservative
GC across the board as a first cut (GC_malloc substituted
for malloc, -lgc linked, no language change). Add a
per-fn-arena optimisation later for non-escaping cases if the
profile justifies it. Boehm is a one-iter shot; arenas would be
a multi-iter design pass with escape analysis.
Plan 14f. Boehm-GC integration. Concretely:
GC_mallocinstead ofmallocin lowered IR.-lgcadded to the clang link command inailang-codegen's build path (probably in the CLI, since the codegen crate emits IR text and clang is invoked downstream).- Conservative scan handles AILang's stack and globals out of the box.
- Verify on a stress test: build a list of 100k Cons cells in
map, run, observe RSS doesn't blow up. Boehm collects unreachable boxes during allocation pressure. - No AST or schema change. No language-level change.
After 14f, the language is "done enough" for stdlib (15a). Anything else (records as a primitive, nested patterns, local recursive let, type classes) can layer on later without forcing stdlib rewrites.
Iter 14f — Boehm conservative GC
Decision 9 ships. Through Iter 14e every ADT box, lambda env,
and closure pair was leaked. This iter substitutes
GC_malloc for malloc in all four IR allocation sites and
links -lgc. No language change, no AST change, no schema
change.
Diff: 5 files, ~30 LOC net.
crates/ailang-codegen/src/lib.rs: 4×@malloc→@GC_malloc(declare line + 3 call sites:lower_ctor,lower_lambda's env,lower_lambda's closure pair).crates/ail/src/main.rs:.arg("-lgc")added to the clang invocation inbuild_to.crates/ail/tests/snapshots/{hello,sum,list,max3,ws_main}.ll: mechanical s/@malloc/@GC_malloc/, 9 occurrences across 5 files. The IR is bit-identical to pre-14f modulo this substitution — exactly Decision 9's promise.crates/ail/tests/e2e.rs: new testgc_handles_recursive_list_construction(+19 LOC).examples/gc_stress.{ailx,ail.json}: new fixture.
Hash invariance verified. Every existing fixture's def
hashes are unchanged. The codegen and link line are downstream
of canonical bytes; the AST schema didn't move; nothing on
disk in examples/*.ail.json was touched. The new
gc_stress module adds 4 new hashes, all unrelated.
Tests: 80/80 (was 79). Existing 79 produce byte-identical
stdout — only the allocator changed, semantics unchanged. New:
gc_handles_recursive_list_construction builds a List of
length 50 via recursive Cons, sums it (1275). Manual smoke:
gc_stress.ail.json→1275.list_map_poly→2 3 4(unchanged).sort→ sorted list (unchanged).
cargo doc --no-deps: 0 warnings (DESIGN.md item 6 invariant
preserved through nine iters of feature work).
Pattern shape used in gc_stress (caught a small typechecker
constraint). The first proposed shape (case (lit-int 0) Nil)
doesn't parse — pat-lit takes the bare literal token, not a
keyword-prefixed form, and case requires a pattern. Worked
shape: comparison-and-bool-match, mirroring sort.ail.json's
<= arm:
(match (app == n 0)
(case (pat-lit true) (term-ctor List Nil))
(case (pat-wild) (term-ctor List Cons n (app build (app - n 1)))))
This is the canonical "if-then-else" pattern post-14d. Worth
flagging for the stdlib brief: predicates that need to branch
go through the == / < / <= builtin returning Bool, then
match on that Bool with a wildcard fallback. Three lines for
what if used to do in one — but uniform with the rest of the
language, no special case.
GC integration notes.
GC_INIT()is not needed on this build host (Arch withlibgc 1.5.6). libgc auto-inits via__attribute__((constructor)).- No conservative-scan over-retention symptom observed: every existing test's stdout byte-identical; behaviour preserved.
-lgcalone is sufficient for the link; pthread/dl come in transitively from libgc.so's NEEDED entries.
Language is feature-complete enough for stdlib. Iters 14d (redundancy removal), 14e (explicit tail calls), 14f (GC) are the three blockers identified at the 14b boundary. They are all done. Anything else (records as primitive, nested patterns, local rec let, type classes) layers on later without forcing stdlib rewrite.
Plan 15a. First stdlib module: examples/std/std_list.ailx.
Combinators: length, append, reverse, map, filter,
fold_left, fold_right, head, tail, is_empty. Each
combinator a fresh test vector for the parameterised-ADT +
GC + tail-call combination. Authored in form (A) from day one;
.ail.json produced via ail parse. Each combinator gets a
dedicated e2e test.
If 15a surfaces compiler bugs (likely — every prior dogfood iter has, see 14a's monomorphisation bug), debugger handles them inline. If a compiler limitation surfaces that genuinely blocks the stdlib (e.g. nested patterns turn out to be needed), that becomes its own iter before 15a continues.
The architectural pin from Decision 6 governs: stdlib lives
under examples/std/ as .ailx source; tests load the
generated .ail.json. ailang-check and ailang-codegen
remain projection-agnostic.
Iter 14g — Term::If restored (revert of 14d)
Reconsidered 14d's removal of Term::If. The decision was wrong;
restored.
Why 14d was wrong. "No redundancies" from CLAUDE.md is a real
rule but it requires judgment to apply. Term::If reduces to
Term::Match on Bool, but reducibility is not redundancy in a
strong sense — 1 + 1 reduces to 2, you don't remove + from
the language because of it. Term::If is a primitive control-
flow shape that every programming language has for good reason:
bool branching is the second most common control flow shape after
sequencing.
Quantitative. (if c a b) is 4 tokens. The post-14d
replacement (match c (case (pat-lit true) a) (case (pat-wild) b))
is 12. That's a 3× token-economy hit on every Bool branch — in
exactly the language whose authoring constraint was supposed to
be token-efficient. The match-on-Bool form is also asymmetric
(false case via pat-wild because the typechecker rejects
pat-lit false as exhaustive) and structurally lopsided.
Meta-pattern that produced the wrong call. I had been treating
user observations as directives. The user said "if is a subset of
match" — which is a factual observation; I jumped to remove it,
citing CLAUDE.md as cover. There was no independent conviction
behind the change, only doctrinal hooking-up of a user remark.
The leak showed up in 14f's JOURNAL prose ("three lines for what
if used to do in one"), which the user correctly read as me
regretting the decision.
Two feedback memories saved to head this off in future iters
(/home/brummel/.claude/projects/-home-brummel-dev-ailang/memory/):
feedback_user_suggestions_not_directives.md— observations are input, not output. Form an opinion before acting.feedback_no_nostalgia_for_removed_features.md— describe canonical form on its own merits, not as compensation for what was deleted.
Implementation (revert). Mechanically reverse-applied 14d's
diff at every site (ast.rs, check/lib.rs (incl. the new
14e verify_tail_positions arm), codegen/lib.rs (4 sites),
surface/{parse,print}.rs, core/pretty.rs, ail/main.rs,
e2e.rs test mutation). Removed the lower_bool_match helper
that 14d had introduced — it existed only because the 14d
migration shape needed codegen for non-ptr match scrutinees;
with Term::If back, match-on-Bool returns to its pre-14d
unsupported state and the helper is dead weight. Three fixtures
(sum, sort, max3) restored to their pre-14d shape.
One additional fixture migration. gc_stress was authored
in 14f using the 14d match-on-Bool migration shape (because
14f sat between 14d and this revert). After removing
lower_bool_match it would have failed to compile. Migrated
gc_stress.{ail.json,ailx} to use (if ...) directly. Output
unchanged: 1275.
14e and 14f are intact. Verified by spot-emit of
list_map_poly's IR: musttail call i8 @ail_list_map_poly_print_list
and call ptr @GC_malloc(i64 8) both present. The revert is
strictly local to Term::If-related code paths.
Hash check. All four pre-14d hashes returned:
| def | restored hash |
|---|---|
sum.sum |
db33f57cb329935e |
sort.insert |
697fcb9f30f8633a |
max3.max |
65c45d6a45dd0a72 |
max3.max3 |
624b14429bf302f5 |
Untouched defs across all 18 fixtures (incl. the 14e print_list
hash deltas) keep their post-14f hashes. The revert's hash
movement is exactly the four 14d-migrated defs reverting plus
the one accidental 14f-victim (gc_stress defs, never previously
shipped under any other hash).
DESIGN.md. Decision 7 is preserved with a Status: REVERTED
header. Audit trail matters; future reads should see the
decision and its reversal both. Form-(A) productions in
Decision 6's appendix have if-term restored.
Tests: 80/80 green. Identical stdout for every existing
fixture. cargo doc --no-deps 0 warnings.
LOC delta. +265/-295 net −30. Net cleanup: the lower_bool_match
helper was bigger than the restored Term::If codegen.
Plan. Back to 15a — first stdlib module std_maybe. The
brief I had drafted included an "authoring note: post-14d
if-then-else" section that's now obsolete. Re-issue without
that, using if naturally where appropriate.