Strictly additive new crate per Decision 6 architectural pin. JSON-AST stays the source of truth; ailang-surface is one producer/consumer of ailang_core::ast::Module values. ailang-check and ailang-codegen unchanged. Crate contents: - src/lex.rs (~264 LOC): 3-rule lexical core. Whitespace and parens delimit tokens; semicolon to EOL is comment; first-character classifier (digit -> int, " -> string, else -> ident). - src/parse.rs (~1041 LOC): hand-written recursive descent. One Rust fn per EBNF production. No parser-combinator dep. - src/print.rs (~371 LOC): deterministic pretty-printer. Round-trip contract with parse() is the surface's correctness gate. - tests/round_trip.rs (~128 LOC): integration test runs every examples/*.ail.json fixture through print -> parse -> canonical JSON, asserts canonical-byte equality with the original. Two AST-driven form widenings beyond the 14b sketch (both folded into DESIGN.md Decision 6): - lam-term carries (typed name type) params, ret type, and optional effects (Term::Lam has parallel param_tys/ret_ty/ effects fields). - import-clause admits (import name (as alias)?) (Import.alias is Option<String>). Production count ~28, under 30-rule budget. Constraint 1 (formalisable for foreign LLM) intact. Verification: - cargo build --workspace green. - cargo test --workspace: 76 tests green (was 64; +9 surface unit, +2 round-trip integration). All 17 fixtures round-trip byte-identical at canonical level. 3 hand-written .ailx exhibits parse to canonical JSON identical to their .ail.json siblings. - cargo doc --no-deps zero warnings (DESIGN.md item 6 invariant). Manual smoke test (ail parse → ail run): hello, box, list_map_poly all produce expected output through the form-(A) authoring lane end-to-end. CLI: ail parse <file.ailx> [-o <file.ail.json>]. .ail.json remains a first-class input to every existing subcommand. Plan 14d: stdlib (std_list.ailx with length/filter/fold/concat/ reverse/head/tail), authored in form (A) from day one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
27 KiB
AILang — design decisions
This document records the core decisions for AILang. It is my contract with myself across future iterations. Prefer cuts over growth.
Goal
AILang is a programming language for LLM authors. It compiles to LLVM IR. Performance: native, no GC for the MVP.
Optimised for:
- Machine readability over human ergonomics. The source is structured.
- Local reasoning. Every definition carries its full type and effects.
- Provability. Pure core language, explicit effects, optional refinements.
- Robustness against hallucinations. Symbols are hashable; tools can verify existence without spending context window.
Project ecosystem
AILang is not just a language but an ecosystem. The language on its own is only valuable when its surroundings make it usable, checkable, and extensible for its target user (LLM authors). The repo therefore contains several equally important components — none of them optional, all of them evolving in lockstep with the language:
- Language core (
crates/ailang-core,crates/ailang-check,crates/ailang-codegen): AST, type system, codegen. - CLI (
crates/ail): toolchain for tooling consumers —manifest,describe,deps,check,build, etc., preferably with--jsonfor machine consumption. - Examples (
examples/): canonical.ail.jsonprograms. They are specification anchors, not demos — the E2E suite hangs off them. - Agents (
agents/): specialised sub-prompts (implementer, architect, tester, debugger) that form the project's own LLM tooling. They are a versioned part of the repo. Seeagents/README.md. - Docs (
docs/): DESIGN.md (what and why), JOURNAL.md (history). - Tests: unit tests per crate plus E2E in
crates/ail/tests/e2e.rs. Every new compiler path needs a test, otherwise the feature does not count as done.
When the language grows, these components grow with it. New tools that
strengthen the LLM tooling (e.g. ail diff, IR snapshot diffs, new agents)
explicitly belong in the ecosystem inventory of this section and are added
here as soon as they are established.
Project language: English
All in-tree content is written in English: source code (identifiers,
comments, string literals, CLI help), design documents, the journal, agent
prompts, READMEs, commit messages, examples, and CLAUDE.md. The live
conversation between user and me stays German for ergonomic reasons;
everything that lands in git is English. This keeps diffs and tooling output
uniform and matches the audience for AILang (LLM authors), for whom English
is the default.
Decision 1: source = data, not text
A module is a JSON object with a fixed schema. There is no parser for free-form text. Typos in identifiers turn into hash-lookup errors that the compiler proposes a fix for directly.
A textual form exists (.ail, S-expression-like), but only as a
bidirectional projection of the JSON form. It is intended for human reviews
and diffs.
Canonical format: .ail.json with deterministic key order.
Decision 2: content-addressed definitions
Every top-level definition has a hash value (BLAKE3 over canonical JSON
without the hash field itself). References between definitions go primarily
by name — names are for readability. The hash is the canonical identity.
Advantages:
- Refactoring by adding new defs, not by in-place change. Old versions stay callable until manually removed.
- Caching of typecheck results and codegen per hash.
- Diffs show exactly which def has changed.
Decision 3: pure core language + algebraic effects
The default is total, pure functions. Effects are declared as a set in the
function type: (Int) -> Int ![IO]. The effect set is row-polymorphic
(![IO | r]). In the MVP only the effects IO and Diverge (for infinite
loops) are wired up.
This is the most important LLM property: when I read a function, I can trust its signature without reading the body.
Decision 4: Hindley-Milner + optional refinements
MVP: HM with let-polymorphism. All types are inferable, but at the top level they must always be explicitly annotated (for local reasoning).
Later: refinement annotations that escalate to SMT. (i: Int | i >= 0). They
are reserved in the AST from the start, but in the MVP they are simply passed
through as opaque strings.
Decision 5: emit LLVM IR as text
Instead of inkwell or llvm-sys: AILang produces .ll files as strings
and hands them to clang for linking.
Rationale:
- The LLVM IR text syntax is largely stable across versions.
- No build dependency on a specific libllvm version.
- Generated code is trivially inspectable, which makes debugging much easier.
- An LLM can read the generated IR directly, which is harder with opaque library calls.
Trade-off: no inline optimisations through the LLVM API. We rely on
clang -O2 as the standard pipeline.
Decision 6: authoring surface (Iter 14b — WIP)
Status: design pass in progress. Reading without skipping the JOURNAL will leave this section ahead of the implementation.
Why this is opening up
Iters 1 through 14a authored everything as raw *.ail.json. That worked
for 17 fixture files (each ≤ 60 LOC of JSON) but does not scale. Two
breaking signals:
- The token-economy cost of the JSON-AST is massive: a single integer
literal
1is encoded as{"t":"lit","lit":{"kind":"int","value":1}}— ~38 tokens of structural overhead per bit of semantics. For a stdlib in the 200–500 def range this displaces real attention budget. - JSON-AST authoring exposes a class of errors (wrong field names,
silently-accepted extra fields under
#[serde(default)], inconsistent ctor casing) that surface only at load time. The schema is correct-by-construction in storage but error-prone in authoring.
Decision 1 anticipated this: it says a textual form exists "as a
bidirectional projection of the JSON form." The pretty-printer already
emits S-expression-style text (see crates/ailang-core/src/pretty.rs).
What is missing is the inverse direction — text → AST. Decision 6
adds that inverse as one authoring projection alongside the
existing pretty-printer; the JSON-AST remains the source of truth.
Architectural pin: data structure is the source of truth
The textual surface is not a replacement for the JSON-AST. It is one projection among potentially many. Concretely:
- The JSON-AST keeps its role as the canonical, hashable, content- addressed representation of a module. All hashing, content- addressing, cross-module references, and typecheck/codegen input flow through the JSON-AST. No new hashable form is introduced.
- The textual surface (form A, this Decision) is the AI authoring projection: optimised for me producing programs token-efficiently and for foreign LLMs producing programs from a spec. It is not optimised for human authors and does not need to be human-pleasant.
- Future projections are explicitly anticipated: a visual / graphical
front-end is a plausible second projection for human review and
inspection (display being the one case where non-AI eyes matter).
The architecture leaves room: any producer of well-formed
ailang-core::ast::Modulevalues is a valid front-end. - No human is expected to author AILang seriously. Authoring is AI work. Display and verification, by contrast, are concerns where human-facing alternatives may be useful — and which can therefore layer their own projections on top of the same AST without touching the surface or the core.
In code terms: ailang-core owns the AST. ailang-surface (new in
Iter 14c) is one producer/consumer pair: text-form-A → AST → text-
form-A. A hypothetical ailang-visual would be a different producer
of the same AST. ailang-check and ailang-codegen consume only
the AST and remain projection-agnostic.
Constraints (hard, in priority order)
- Formalizable for a foreign LLM. The grammar must fit in an EBNF/PEG spec of ≤ 30 productions. A model that has never seen AILang must be able to read the spec and produce conforming source zero-shot. Rules out: precedence between binary operators, semantic indentation, maximal-munch lexing, context-sensitive reductions.
- AST-isomorphic. Every surface form maps to exactly one AST shape. Round-trip surface → AST → canonical JSON → AST → surface is the identity (modulo formatting). Hashes computed via the round-tripped JSON must equal hashes of the same module written directly in JSON.
- No external symbols. ASCII only. No Greek (
∀), no arrows (→), no subscripts. Reasoning: I substitute mojibake for non-ASCII characters under context pressure; foreign LLMs vary in how they tokenize Unicode. - No precedence. Either everything is parenthesized, or there
are no infix operators. Prefer the latter —
add(x, 1)overx + 1. Removes a fail mode for both me and foreign LLMs. - No semantic indentation. Block structure expressed by paired delimiters or terminator tokens. Indentation is informational only; the parser ignores it.
- One construct per token-list. Every AST node corresponds to exactly one parenthesized form (or atom). No "sometimes you can omit the parens" rules.
- AST surface stays frozen. The surface adapts to the AST, not the other way around. We do not change the JSON schema or invalidate hashes to make the surface prettier.
Candidate notations (same map encoded in each)
The reference target — the polymorphic map from examples/list_map_poly.ail.json:
data List a where Nil | Cons a (List a)
fn map : forall a b. ((a) -> b, List a) -> List b
= \f xs. match xs of Nil -> Nil
| Cons h t -> Cons(f(h), map(f, t))
(A) S-expression with fully-tagged AST nodes
(module list_map_poly
(data List (vars a)
(ctor Nil)
(ctor Cons a (con List a)))
(fn inc
(type (fn-type (params (con Int)) (ret (con Int))))
(params x)
(body (app + x 1)))
(fn map
(type
(forall (vars a b)
(fn-type
(params (fn-type (params a) (ret b)) (con List a))
(ret (con List b)))))
(params f xs)
(body
(match xs
(case (pat-ctor Nil) (term-ctor List Nil))
(case (pat-ctor Cons h t)
(term-ctor List Cons
(app f h)
(app map f t)))))))
Grammar core (3-rule lexical layer + ~25 named-form productions):
sexpr ::= atom | "(" sexpr* ")"
atom ::= integer | string | ident
ident ::= any maximal non-whitespace, non-paren run that is not
a recognised integer or string literal.
The lexer recognises one delimiter (( / )) and whitespace.
Every other maximal token is classified post-hoc:
- All-digit run with optional leading
-→ integer atom. "-delimited run → string atom.- Otherwise → ident.
Consequence: operators like +, ==, <=, **, qualified
names like io/print_int, and cross-module references like
std_list.map are all single ident tokens with no special lex
rule. The only reserved tokens are (, ), and whitespace.
Bool literals (true, false) and unit ((lit-unit)) are
disambiguated by parser context, not by lex.
Every AST node form has a unique head keyword (module, data,
fn, forall, fn-type, con, var, app, lam, match,
case, pat-ctor, term-ctor, do, seq, ...). A bare atom in
a positional slot (e.g. inside (con List a) second position) is
a name reference whose sort is determined by the parent slot:
- inside
(con NAME args...)second-and-later positions → type expression. Bare atom there ⇒Type::Var { name }. - inside
(app HEAD args...)first position ⇒Term::Var. - inside
(pat-ctor CTOR fields...)field positions ⇒Pattern::Var. - inside
(case PAT BODY)second position ⇒ term.
There is no lexical case rule. To construct a value with a
ctor, write (term-ctor TypeName CtorName args...). To match
against one, write (pat-ctor CtorName fields...). Capitalised
identifiers carry no special meaning to the parser. This rules
out a class of silent errors ("I forgot to capitalise Cons and
it parsed as a function call").
Pros: smallest formal grammar of any candidate (the lexical
core is 3 rules; the named-form productions are uniform — every
node a tagged list). Foreign-LLM bar lowest. Round-trip with the
existing pretty-printer is a refactor of pretty.rs to emit this
tagged form, plus a new parser.
Cons: paren density is high. (forall (vars a b) (fn-type ...)) has more visual nesting than the current pretty-printer's
forall a. (...) -> .... Verbosity is ~2× JSON for the same node
when measured in characters, but ~8× shorter in lines (the
existing JSON box.ail.json of 160 lines becomes ~20 lines in
this form).
(B) Indented record-style with explicit terminators
module std_list
data List(a):
Nil
Cons(a, List(a))
end
fn map:
type: forall a b. fn(fn(a) -> b, List(a)) -> List(b)
params: f, xs
body:
match xs:
Nil => Nil
Cons(h, t) => Cons(f(h), map(f, t))
end
end
Grammar core (~20–30 productions): module-level (def/data/end), type sub-grammar (forall, fn, con, var), term sub-grammar (lam, match, ctor, app, lit, var, seq), pattern sub-grammar.
Pros: higher information density per line, closer to mainstream
ML/Haskell shape. Cons: four sub-grammars instead of one.
forall a b. fn(...) keeps a pseudo-precedence (-> binds tighter
than the outer fn(...) wrapper). Foreign-LLM bar higher.
(C) Pretty-printer-as-source
Use exactly the format pretty::module already emits, plus a parser
that accepts it. The existing pretty-printer's quirks (:: for
type-of, [params] for fn-params, <a> for type-args, forall a. ...,
!IO, () ambiguous between unit-arg-list and empty-form) become
the spec.
Pros: zero churn — the existing pretty-printer is already the
spec; only the inverse is missing. Round-trip is the identity by
construction. Cons: the existing format mixes four mini-dialects
(s-expr at term level, ML-shape at type level, square brackets for
params, <> for type args). Formalising it crisply is harder than
designing a uniform form from scratch.
First choice and rollback plan
Try (A) first. Reasoning: constraint 1 (formalizable) outweighs
constraint readability. (A) has a 3-rule core grammar with one
lexical disambiguation rule. (B) doubles the rule count and
re-introduces a soft form of precedence (-> inside forall).
(C) is tempting because it is zero-design but the resulting spec is
visibly heterogeneous, which is exactly what constraint 1 was meant
to rule out.
If implementing (A) reveals that paren density actively hurts my authoring (measurable: I make more wrong-paren errors than the JSON-AST shape produced before), roll back and try (C). (B) stays on the shelf for a future iter only if both fail.
Implementation outline (Iter 14c onwards, not done in 14b)
crates/ailang-surface— new crate. Strictly additive. PEG parser produces existingailang-core::asttypes. No new AST nodes, no schema changes, no new hashable form. Pretty-printer for form (A) lives here too (the round-trip is the contract).ailang-check,ailang-codegenare not modified. They continue to consumeailang-core::ast::Modulevalues regardless of which projection produced them.- Round-trip test: for every
examples/*.ail.json, parse the corresponding hand-written*.ailx, canonicalise, and assert hash-equivalence to the original. Hash equivalence is the truth check; the surface ships only if every fixture round-trips identically. - CLI:
ail parse <file.ailx> -o <file.ail.json>. Symmetric to existingail render..ail.jsonremains a first-class input to every existing subcommand; the parser is a producer, not a gatekeeper. - Iter 14d: stdlib (
std_list,std_maybe, ...) authored in form (A) from day one because that is the AI authoring projection, not because JSON authoring is forbidden. The resulting.ail.jsonis what tests and downstream tools see.
What this Decision deliberately does not do
- It does not promote form (A) to the source of truth. Form (A) is one projection; the JSON-AST stays canonical.
- It does not foreclose visual or graphical front-ends. The crate
layout (
coreowns AST;surface/visual/... are siblings) reserves that lane. - It does not remove
.ail.jsonas input. Every existing CLI subcommand (check,render,describe,emit-ir,build,run,manifest,deps,diff,workspace,builtins) keeps its current.ail.jsoninterface.
Form refinements during Iter 14c implementation
Two productions in the original 14b sketch had to be widened during implementation to round-trip the existing AST faithfully. Captured here for the spec record:
-
lam-termcarries types and effects. The AST'sTerm::Lamstores parallelparams,param_tys,ret_ty, andeffectsfields. The 14b sketch had only names. The implemented form islam-term ::= "(" "lam" "(" "params" typed-param* ")" "(" "ret" type ")" effects-clause? body-attr ")" typed-param ::= "(" "typed" ident type ")"This keeps the no-precedence / one-construct-per-token-list invariants and adds no new lexical rules.
-
import-clauseadmits an optional alias. The AST'sImport.aliasisOption<String>; the original sketch only supported theNonecase. The implemented form isimport-clause ::= "(" "import" ident ("as" ident)? ")"asis a bare ident token in this position; no special lexical rule is needed.
Neither change extends the grammar's rule budget meaningfully:
the 30-production ceiling of constraint 1 is intact (the parser
implements ~28 named productions). All 17 examples/*.ail.json
fixtures round-trip identically through print → parse → canonical JSON; the three hand-written .ailx exhibits parse to canonical
JSON identical to their corresponding .ail.json files.
Mangling scheme (Iter 5c)
All AILang functions are mangled to @ail_<module>_<def> — even in the
single-module case. Constants likewise (@ail_<module>_<const>). Global
string literals carry a short hint for readability:
@.str_<module>_<hint>_<idx> (e.g. @.str_sum_fmt_int_0). The entry point
is a define i32 @main() trampoline (C / LLVM ABI) that calls
@ail_<entry-module>_main(). source_filename exists exactly once per
workspace and carries the entry-module name (<entry-module>.ail).
Convention: qualified cross-module references (Iter 5b)
Cross-module calls use no new AST node. Instead, a Term::Var { name }
with exactly one dot in the name is a qualified reference: <prefix>.<def>.
<prefix>is an import alias (import { module: "X", as: "<prefix>" }) or, when imported without an alias, the module name itself.<def>is the name of a top-level definition in the target module.- Def names MUST NOT contain a dot — the typechecker reports
invalid-def-namewithctx: { "reason": "contains-dot" }. - The workspace loader (Iter 5a) finds all reachable modules; the
typechecker (Iter 5b,
check_workspace) resolves dotted names through the import map. Diagnostic codes:unknown-module(prefix not imported),unknown-import(module found, def not).
Hash stability: no new AST node, no renamed fields — all previous module hashes stay bit-identical.
Data model (MVP)
Module
{
"schema": "ailang/v0",
"name": "<id>",
"imports": [{ "module": "<id>", "as": "<id>" }],
"defs": [Def...]
}
Def
kind ∈ { "fn", "type", "effect", "const" }. In the MVP only fn and const.
{
"kind": "fn",
"name": "<id>",
"type": Type,
"params": ["<id>"...],
"body": Term,
"doc": "<optional string>"
}
Term (expression)
{ "t": "lit", "lit": { "kind": "int" | "bool" | "unit", "value": ... } }
{ "t": "var", "name": "<id>" }
{ "t": "app", "fn": Term, "args": [Term...] }
{ "t": "let", "name": "<id>", "value": Term, "body": Term }
{ "t": "if", "cond": Term, "then": Term, "else": Term }
{ "t": "do", "op": "<eff>/<op>", "args": [Term...] }
{ "t": "ctor", "type": "<id>", "ctor": "<id>", "args": [Term...] }
{ "t": "match", "scrutinee": Term, "arms": [Arm...] }
{ "t": "lam",
"params": ["<id>"...],
"paramTypes": [Type...],
"retType": Type,
"effects": ["<id>"...],
"body": Term }
{ "t": "seq", "lhs": Term, "rhs": Term }
In the MVP, do is only a direct call to a built-in effect op (no handler).
A lam term constructs an anonymous function value; free variables of
its body are captured from the enclosing scope (see Iter 8 closure
conversion in JOURNAL). A seq term evaluates lhs for its effects
(its result must be Unit) and yields rhs's value — equivalent to
let _ = lhs in rhs.
Type
{ "k": "con", "name": "Int" }
{ "k": "con", "name": "Bool" }
{ "k": "con", "name": "Unit" }
{ "k": "fn", "params": [Type...], "ret": Type, "effects": ["IO"...] }
{ "k": "var", "name": "a" }
{ "k": "forall", "vars": ["a"...], "body": Type }
Pipeline
.ail.json ─┐
├─ load + validate schema
├─ resolve names + assign hashes
├─ typecheck (HM, effect rows)
├─ lower to MIR (SSA-like, named SSA values)
├─ emit LLVM IR (.ll)
└─ clang -O2 *.ll -o binary
CLI
ail check <module.ail.json> — loads, validates, typechecks
ail manifest <module.ail.json> — table: name :: type !effects [hash]
ail describe <module> <name> — detail of a definition
ail render <module> — JSON → pretty-print
ail parse <module.ail> — pretty-print → JSON (for bootstrapping)
ail emit-ir <module> — writes .ll
ail build <module> — full pipeline → binary
ail run <module> — build + execute (tempdir), passthrough exit code
Verification and correctness (across cycles)
- Snapshot tests for the pretty-printer and IR emit. The diff makes regressions visible immediately.
- Property tests for the JSON ↔ pretty-print roundtrip.
- End-to-end tests for
examples/with expected program output. - Hash stability: a test ensures the same def always produces the same hash.
- CI pin of the outputs in
tests/expected/. - Rustdoc cleanliness:
cargo doc --no-depsruns warning-free. Maintained by theailang-docwriteragent (Iter 13d onward); fixing a rustdoc warning is part of the iter that introduced it, not a follow-up.
What is not (yet) supported
Snapshot of the boundary at the end of Iter 13. Items move out of this list as iterations land; the JOURNAL records the exact iteration.
- No effect handlers — only the built-in IO and Diverge ops.
- No refinements / SMT escalation.
- No HM inference inside bodies. Top-level def types are explicit;
polymorphism is opt-in via
Type::Forall { vars, body }. Inside a body, lambdas check monomorphically against their declared type. - Polymorphic fns must be directly called at the use site.
Passing a polymorphic fn as a value (
let f = id in f(42)) is not yet supported — it would need one closure-pair global per instantiation, deferred. - No higher-rank polymorphism. Passing a polymorphic fn to another
polymorphic fn (
apply(id, 42)) is not supported. - No cross-module ADTs. ADTs are local to a module; ctor names must be unique within their module but may collide across modules.
- No visibility rules in imports. Every top-level def of an imported module
is reachable; there is no
pub/priv. - No GC. ADT boxes, lambda envs, and closure pairs all leak. Acceptable for current example programs; required before any longer-running program.
What is supported (and used as the smoke test for the pipeline):
- Int, Bool, Unit, Str as primitive types.
if,let, function calls, recursion.- Effects on function signatures, with
do op(args)for direct effect ops (io/print_int,io/print_bool,io/print_str). - ADTs + flat pattern matching (Iter 3). Sub-patterns of a Ctor
pattern are restricted to
Var/Wild. - Imports + qualified cross-module references via dotted names (Iter 5).
- First-class function references (Iter 7). A top-level fn name (or
qualified
prefix.def) used as aTerm::Varis a fn-value. - Anonymous lambdas with capture (Iter 8).
Term::Lamconstructs a closure that captures any free variables of its body from the enclosing scope. All fn-values share a single ABI: aptrto a closure pair{ thunk_ptr, env_ptr }. Top-level fns get an auto- generated adapter and a static closure pair (env = null) so they remain passable as values without heap overhead. - Polymorphism via
Type::Forallat top-level def types (Iter 12). Use sites instantiate fresh metavars; unification pins them against the concrete types of the call args. Codegen monomorphises on demand: each unique instantiation emits a specialised LLVM fn mangled@ail_<m>_<def>__<descriptor>(e.g.id__IforidatInt,apply__I_Iforapplyat(Int, Int)). - Parameterised ADTs (Iter 13).
TypeDef.vars: Vec<String>declares type parameters;Type::Con.args: Vec<Type>carries the type arguments at use sites. Both fields default to empty and are skipped during serialization, so canonical-JSON hashes of every pre-13a definition stay bit-identical (regression test incrates/ailang-core/src/hash.rs). Ctor and match codegen stay inline at every use site — there is no specialised ADT symbol — but LLVM field types are derived per use site by substituting throughcdef.ail_fields. The substitution is read off the call's arg types (ctor) or the scrutinee'sType::Con.args(match). An unresolvedType::Varreachingllvm_typeis a hard error rather than a silent fallback toptr.
Pipeline regression smoke tests:
examples/sum.ail.json→ prints 55 (recursion, arithmetic).examples/list.ail.json→ prints 42 (ADTs + match).examples/hof.ail.json→ prints 42 (first-class fn-refs, indirect call).examples/closure.ail.json→ prints 42 (lambda capturing a let-bound var).examples/list_map.ail.json→ prints 2/4/6 (ADTs + closure + recursive HOF + IO; the dogfood smoke test).examples/sort.ail.json→ prints sorted [3,1,4,1,5,9,2,6,5,3,5] one-per-line (insertion sort over an 11-element list).examples/poly_id.ail.json→ prints 42 then "true" (polymorphic identity atIntandBool; two specialised fns emitted).examples/poly_apply.ail.json→ prints 42 (polymorphicapplywith a fn-typed parameter;apply(succ, 41)).examples/box.ail.json→ prints 42 (parameterised ADT round- trip:MkBox(42)constructed, then projected by a polymorphicunbox : forall a. (Box<a>) -> aand printed).examples/maybe_int.ail.json→ prints 7 then 99 (pattern match overMaybe<Int>:or_else(Some(7), 99)thenor_else(None, 99)).