A read-only coherence skim across the project (the contract edits
themselves verified code-true, INDEX bijection exact, all pins green)
surfaced two pre-existing drifts — both predating this audit, neither
from the contract pass. Fixed in the same conservative style.
1. Model 0008 (ownership-totality) §1+§2 narrated the `Implicit`
leak in the PRESENT tense, contradicting the file's own STATUS
header (Implicit deleted via #55, 76b21c0), contract 0008 ("There
is no `Implicit`"), and the live fixture. §1 claimed "This is
documented intentional behaviour today ... the fixture asserts
`live = 1`"; the `rc_let_implicit_returning_app.ail` fixture now
asserts `live = 0` (its own comment marks the `live = 1` lane as
"Pre-0062"). §2 claimed "the typechecker already treats
`Implicit ≡ Own` (`ParamMode::mode_eq`)"; that variant and fn no
longer exist. Rewrote both to past tense (the leak the cutover
fixed). The STATUS header had been updated at cutover; these two
bodies had not. The design argument (§2-§8) is untouched — the
header frames it as the whitepaper's reasoning and points readers
to the contract for current state.
2. Contract 0010 (scope-boundaries) referenced 18 example fixtures as
`examples/*.ail.json` — files that exist only as `.ail` since the
form-A-default migration (JSON is derived in-process; only the
twelve carve-outs remain `.ail.json` on disk). All 18 → `.ail`
(every target verified present). Same single stale file-path ref in
model 0001 §3 (`list_map_poly`) corrected; model 0001's other two
`.ail.json` mentions are intentional references to the canonical
JSON *form* (the whitepaper's subject) and were left.
Honesty sweep clean; design_index_pin / docs_honesty_pin /
effect_doc_honesty_pin green; no dangling example path remains.
Brummel
c747cdf932