Bencher ran the tail-latency bench post-RC-fix. Boehm's p99=7131µs
is 74× its median (96µs); explicit-mode RC's p99=453µs is 1.62× its
median (280µs). Decision 10's real-time claim has a first piece of
evidence on the correct axis (tail latency) — 18f's throughput
bench measured the wrong thing.
Surprise finding: explicit-mode RC leaks at the same RSS rate as
implicit-mode RC (511MB peak on both). The (own ...) +
(reuse-as) + (drop-iterative) annotations don't drive deallocation
in tail-recursive arms because pattern-binder t is consumed into
the tail-call (consume_count > 0, Iter A skips); the outer LCons
husk has all its ptr fields moved out but no drop site shallow-decs
it. Genuine 18d.4 implementation gap, queued as Iter 18g (#82).
Retirement decision (Path A vs Path B from 18f) still open; now
joined by the outer-cell-shallow-dec finding. Both feed the
eventual decision.
Brummel
bb7611f85e