Discussion-draft, not an approved spec. Captures today's findings:
- Repeated BLOCKEDs on iter 23.4 family were a spec-defect signal,
not a plan-defect signal.
- Today's spec-verification (brainstorm Step 7 + 8) is purely
linguistic — no code-grounded check of load-bearing assumptions.
- Spec-23's 'work the same way as 22b.3' half-sentence was the
exact load-bearing assumption that broke. Three preps spent
patching what should have been caught pre-approval.
Proposes a new agent that, with fresh context between brainstorm
Step 6 and Step 7, extracts load-bearing assumptions from the spec
draft and searches for an existing green fixture ratifying each.
Default on miss: spec discarded, blocked idea moved to roadmap with
'depends on: <missing prerequisite>'.
Eight open design questions left for the next session's brainstorm
to answer.
Brummel
d96d8c5cc2