audit: document-first cycle close — doc verb rosters caught up
Architect review (cycle 757e3ac): core clean — show is pure shell
dispatch over Env::registry() (C28); both ledger amendments match the
F1-F8 decision log exactly; document schema untouched; the #164
no-framing pin is stricter than the spec snippet asked. Four peripheral
drift items, resolved:
- fix: docs/authoring-guide.md verb rosters now name show (process) and
show|runs (campaign) — the guide teaches exactly the
generate->retrieve->extend loop this cycle closed.
- fix: docs/glossary.md campaign/process document entries carry the
settled verb sets (record-reality glossary write).
- fix: show_process's not-found refusal now sources its prose from
ref_fault_prose(ProcessNotFound) instead of a hand-copied format!
(byte-identical, test-pinned; the campaign-side prose has no RefFault
sibling and stays the single campaign instance).
- ratify (log-only): the shipped show helpers use print! (no framing,
#164) where the spec snippet sketched println! — the code is the
stricter, correct form; recorded on the reference issue's decision
log. The spec is a git-ignored working file swept at this close.
Regression: aura-bench report-only run, all fingerprints OK, deltas in
noise (host load 9.6 noted; engine/ingest/campaign/cli lanes all within
±5%). Full aura-cli gates re-run green after the tidy edits.
refs #300
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ JSON artifact kinds you author headlessly along that arc:
|
||||
1. an **op-script** (role 6a) — builds a node graph (a strategy blueprint)
|
||||
through `aura graph build`;
|
||||
2. a **process document** (role 5) — a named validation/eval methodology
|
||||
through `aura process validate|introspect|register`;
|
||||
through `aura process validate|introspect|register|show`;
|
||||
3. a **campaign document** (role 6b) — experiment intent (instruments ×
|
||||
windows × strategy × axes × process) through `aura campaign
|
||||
validate|introspect|register|run`.
|
||||
validate|introspect|register|show|run|runs`.
|
||||
|
||||
Each section below is a worked, verified example — every command shown was
|
||||
run against this repo and the output is transcribed, not invented. The *why*
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user