Architect drift review (bb90c42..481172a): no contract drift. C9 (render
reads structure + label()/params()/output() only, never eval), C8 (sink =
zero-output leaf, no special case), C12 (blueprint = root composite is
render-structural only; types stay distinct), C23 (consumer-prefix mirrors
the := binding), #38 (composites stay opaque) — all hold. Three fidelity
items, resolved:
- [high, fixed] spec acceptance over-claimed: the SimBroker slot-stub box read
as in-scope though the work is deferred. Spec amended — the stub acceptance
is annotated against #49, the met boxes checked.
- [medium, recorded] no docs/plans/0023: this cycle ran spike→refactor under
user steering instead of planner→implement, because the edge-label-vs-
consumer-side fork needed an empirical probe (ascii-dag silently drops edge
labels on collision) before a placeholder-free plan was possible. A plan
RECORD (not a task plan) now holds the 0023 slot so the counter pairing
stays intact and the next cycle takes 0024.
- [low, carry-on] multi_output_field_name's leaf-producer fallback is latent
and untested (no multi-output leaf in the corpus). Carried as debt.
Regression scripts: none configured (no-op). Build/test/clippy green.
Deferred stub work is tracked in #49 (user-signed).
closes#48
