Honor or retire the --trace NAME family name (currently discarded) #238
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Milestone fieldtest finding (2026-07-11, friction; consumer POV at
d3ad9f4):--trace <NAME>on sweep (and per--helpwalkforward) advertises "Family name that also persists each member's taps", yet the supplied name appears in none of the surfaces the user next needs. Observed:aura sweep … --trace mom-ger40-sept24printed the handlebb1994f9-0, wroteruns/traces/bb1994f9-0/…, andruns familieslisted onlybb1994f9-0-GER40-w0-r0-s0-0— no name field anywhere;aura chart mom-ger40-sept24fails. The task completes, but the flag's advertised purpose (name the family) has no observable effect, so a user cannot address their own family by the name they chose.Two directions, neither clearly default (the choice touches the content-addressed handle convention, C18):
Honor or retire the --trace <NAME> family name (currently discarded)to Honor or retire the --trace NAME family name (currently discarded)Decision (2026-07-11, autonomous run): honor the name — as a read-time resolution query, not new store state.
The supplied
--trace <NAME>is already durable: it lands in the generated campaign document'snamefield, content-addressed in the registry. The trace handle stays content-derived ({campaign8}-{run}, the recorded convention) — the content-addressing convention (ledger C18) is untouched, because the name never becomes a store key; it is resolved by querying what is already recorded.Chosen:
aura chart <ARG>resolves in two steps — the exact handle/run name first (unchanged); otherwise the recorded campaign runs whose campaign document carriesname == ARGand a persistedtrace_name. Exactly one match resolves to its handle; several matches refuse, listing the candidate handles in deterministic order (re-running the same named invocation legitimately produces{campaign8}-0,{campaign8}-1, …) so the user picks explicitly — refuse-don't-guess over latest-wins, which would silently shadow older recorded runs. No match falls through to today's not-found path.Rejected: retiring the name parameter (rewording
--traceto a bare persist toggle) — the flag is shipped, documented surface (authoring guide §3), and the fieldtest's observed expectation (charting by the chosen name) is deliverable without touching the handle convention.Scope: the resolution lands on the chart surface, where the friction was observed; the same query is reusable on other lookup surfaces if wanted later. The families list keeps content-derived names (a name column needs a join against campaign-run records — deferred until a consumer asks).