# Blueprint constant bind — `.bind()` a node param as a structural constant — Design Spec **Date:** 2026-06-12 **Status:** Draft — awaiting user spec review **Authors:** orchestrator + Claude ## Goal Give a param-bearing node a way to fix one of its declared params to a **structural constant** — a value removed from `param_space` entirely, not merely pinned in the injected vector. This closes the gap named in issue #55: today a tunable lives only as a `param_space` knob (#31), correct for **tuning params** (values a run supplies and a sweep varies) but **wrong** for **structural constants** (values whose variation does not yield another valid point of the same strategy but *deforms* it into a different one). An "SMA2-entry" strategy binds `length = 2` to its two-candle construction; sweeping that length does not explore the strategy, it breaks it. Leaving the knob open and fixing it in the vector would declare a degree of freedom that does not exist, and a sweep over it would enumerate deformed strategies as valid family members. The discriminator (from the issue): - variation → another valid point → **tuning param** → `param_space` / vector (#31, exists) - variation → deformed strategy → **structural constant** → bound, **not** in `param_space` (this spec) **Scope.** This cycle ships the `.bind()` overlay only. The issue's third fork — exporting a *named frozen strategy* (a future blueprint-as-values collection) — is deferred and out of scope (see the issue's reconciliation comment, 2026-06-12). ## Architecture The settled direction is **Option B: builder-level bind** (reconciliation comment, 2026-06-12 — "B was originally planned"). `.bind()` is a method on `PrimitiveBuilder`, uniform for every param-bearing node and dynamic per knob. It returns a `PrimitiveBuilder` whose **declared param surface** (`params()` / `schema().params`) is shrunk by the bound slot, and whose **build closure** (`Fn(&[Scalar]) -> Box`) is wrapped to re-splice the captured constant back into its original positional slot before delegating to the inner closure. The load-bearing property is that **the rest of the construction layer needs zero changes**. Both sites the issue update named as "dock sites" already key off `builder.params()`: - `collect_params` (`blueprint.rs:546-569`) iterates `for p in b.params()` and pushes one `ParamSpec` per declared param. A bound slot is gone from `params()`, so it is **never pushed** into `param_space` — the `param_space` side, for free. - `lower_items` (`blueprint.rs:585-628`) takes `n = builder.params().len()`, slices `¶ms[cursor..cursor+n]`, kind-checks it, calls `builder.build(slice)`, and advances `cursor += n`. A bound slot shrinks `n`, so the injected slice is correspondingly shorter and the cursor advances correctly — the **value** side, for free. This **inverts** the issue update's "docks at `collect_params` AND `lower_items`" framing: under B those functions are read-only beneficiaries of the shrink, not edit sites. The only real change site is the new `PrimitiveBuilder::bind` plus its closure-wrapping. **Addressing is by param name** (`.bind(slot: &str, value)`), matching the slot against the node's declared `ParamSpec.name`. This follows the C23 authoring-address-space convention as amended in cycle 0032 (`check_param_namespace_injective`): the by-name *authoring* address space is injective, while the *flat graph* stays wired by raw index (C23 unchanged). Name at the authoring surface, index in the flat graph; `.bind()` sits on the authoring side and resolves the name to a position immediately — the name is not persisted into the flat graph, so C23's "names are non-load-bearing in the flat graph" holds. `.bind()` is **not** the `builder_const(2)` per-node constructor the issue rejects (which "explodes combinatorially — which subset is constant?"): it is one method, naming the slot dynamically, applicable to any subset of a multi-param node. ### Precedent already in tree `SimBroker::builder(0.0001)` (`sim_broker.rs:61-74`) already captures a construction value with `params: vec![]`; `SimBroker::builder(0.0001).schema() .params.is_empty()` is asserted at `sma.rs:144`. So "a value in the blueprint, outside `param_space`" is already legitimate — but only for nodes that offer no sweep mode at all. `.bind()` extends exactly that posture to **param-bearing** nodes (`Sma`, `Exposure`, `LinComb`), which today have no constant path. ## Concrete code shapes ### Worked author example (the empirical evidence for the acceptance criterion) ```rust use aura_core::Scalar; use aura_std::Sma; // "SMA2-entry": the 2 is structural (bound to the two-candle construction), // not a tuning knob. Binding removes `length` from param_space entirely. let sma2 = Sma::builder().named("bias").bind("length", Scalar::I64(2)); assert!(sma2.params().is_empty()); // length is GONE, not just fixed // Contrast — the length-generic SMA keeps `length` open → still sweepable: let sma_generic = Sma::builder().named("bias"); assert_eq!(sma_generic.params().len(), 1); // [length] ``` At the harness level, a strategy whose one node is a bound constant contributes nothing to the sweep's `param_space`, so the sweep family contains only valid points — never deformed ones: ```rust // "sma2_entry" composite: bound `bias.length` is absent from param_space; // only `exp.scale` remains as the harness's open knob. let strat = Composite::new( "sma2_entry", vec![ Sma::builder().named("bias").bind("length", Scalar::I64(2)).into(), Exposure::builder().named("exp").into(), // scale stays open ], edges, roles, output, ); // param_space() on the root composite qualifies each leaf by its OWN node // segment, not by the root composite's name (collect_params is called with an // empty prefix; the root name is not a path segment) — so `exp.scale`, not // `sma2_entry.exp.scale`. The load-bearing point holds either way: the bound // `bias.length` is gone. (Nesting `strat` into a larger harness would prefix // the leaves further, but the bound knob stays absent.) assert_eq!( strat.param_space().iter().map(|p| p.name.as_str()).collect::>(), ["exp.scale"], // bias.length is gone ); ``` ### Implementation shape (secondary) — `PrimitiveBuilder::bind` The build closure type is unchanged (`Fn(&[Scalar]) -> Box`). `bind` shrinks `schema.params` and wraps the closure; `Scalar` is `Copy` (`scalar.rs:20`) so the captured constant re-splices on every call. before — `PrimitiveBuilder` today (`node.rs:77-130`): `params()` returns `&self.schema.params`; `build()` calls `(self.build)(params)`. after — add one method: ```rust // aura-core/src/node.rs — new method on PrimitiveBuilder impl PrimitiveBuilder { /// Bind a declared param `slot` to a structural constant, removing it from the /// node's param surface (`params()` / `schema().params` / the aggregated /// `param_space`). Authoring-time: `slot` names the param (the by-name /// authoring address space, C23/0032) and must match **exactly one** still-open /// param — bind panics on zero matches (unknown / already-bound name) and on /// more than one (an ambiguous duplicate-named slot); `value`'s kind must match /// the slot's declared `ParamSpec.kind`. Returns `Self` so binds chain /// (`.bind(..).bind(..)`). pub fn bind(mut self, slot: &str, value: Scalar) -> Self { // Enforce the "exactly one" precondition rather than assume it: a node's // own `schema.params` is NOT covered by `check_param_namespace_injective` // (that guards only the aggregated path-qualified space, after `.bind()`), // so per-node name uniqueness is not pinned elsewhere. Mirror the // collect-all-then-reject posture of the `resolve` binder (blueprint.rs). let matches: Vec = self .schema .params .iter() .enumerate() .filter(|(_, p)| p.name == slot) .map(|(i, _)| i) .collect(); let pos = match matches.as_slice() { [pos] => *pos, [] => panic!("bind: no open param named `{slot}`"), _ => panic!("bind: ambiguous — multiple open params named `{slot}`"), }; assert_eq!( value.kind(), self.schema.params[pos].kind, "bind: kind mismatch for param `{slot}`", ); self.schema.params.remove(pos); // [param_space side] shrink the declared surface let inner = self.build; // [value side] wrap the build closure self.build = Box::new(move |open: &[Scalar]| { let mut full = open.to_vec(); full.insert(pos, value); // re-splice at the slot's original position inner(&full) }); self } } ``` ### Why chaining is positionally correct (the load-bearing invariant) Each `.bind()` captures `pos` **relative to the param list it sees**, which is exactly the inner closure's input space. The inserts compose without any global original-position table. For a node declaring `[a, b, c]` with `inner(p) = Node::new(p[0], p[1], p[2])`: ```rust // .bind("b", X): pos("b" in [a,b,c]) = 1 → params [a,c] // wrap1(open) = inner( open.insert(1, X) ) // .bind("a", Y): pos("a" in [a,c]) = 0 → params [c] // wrap2(open) = wrap1( open.insert(0, Y) ) // // at build time lower_items hands the open slice in params() order = [v_c]: // wrap2([v_c]) = wrap1([Y, v_c]) = inner([Y, X, v_c]) // full 3-vector, right order ``` The internal representation choice — closure-nesting (this fold of single inserts) vs a splice-table held as data on the builder (`Vec<(pos, value)>`, one merge pass) — is behaviourally equivalent and left to the implementer; it is not a design fork. ## Components - **`aura-core/src/node.rs` — `PrimitiveBuilder::bind`** (new): the only production change. Shrinks `schema.params`, wraps `build`. Validates slot existence and value kind eagerly (authoring-time panic, consistent with `Sma::new`'s `assert!`). - **`aura-engine/src/blueprint.rs` — `collect_params`, `lower_items`, `Composite::param_space`, `compile_with_params`**: **unchanged**. They already key off `builder.params()`; the shrink propagates transparently. (Listed as components only to make the zero-change claim explicit and testable.) - **`aura-std`** nodes (`Sma`, `Exposure`, `LinComb`): **unchanged**. Their builders already declare params and build through their constructors; `.bind()` composes over them without per-node code. ## Data flow Authoring: `Node::builder()` → `.bind(name, value)` resolves `name → pos`, removes the `ParamSpec`, wraps the closure capturing `(pos, value)`. The returned builder has a smaller `params()`. Construction (unchanged): `Composite::param_space()` → `collect_params` iterates `builder.params()` (bound slot absent) → aggregated path-qualified space omits the bound knob. `compile_with_params(params)` checks arity against the (shrunk) `param_space`, then `lower_items` slices `n = builder.params().len()` open values and calls `builder.build(open_slice)`; the wrapped closure reconstructs the full positional vector and delegates to the node constructor. The flat graph is wired by raw index exactly as before (C23). ## Error handling All `.bind()` validation is authoring-time and eager, by hard panic (the builder chain returns `Self`, so a `Result` would break `.bind(..).bind(..)`; panics match the existing `Sma::new` / `LinComb::new` `assert!` posture for authoring bugs): - **Unknown slot name** (typo, or a name already bound and thus gone): panic `bind: no open param named \`\``. - **Ambiguous slot name** (a node declaring two params of the same name — not pinned out elsewhere, since `check_param_namespace_injective` guards only the *aggregated* path-qualified space, after bind): panic `bind: ambiguous — multiple open params named \`\``. `.bind()` enforces the "exactly one match" precondition itself (collect-all-then-reject), so the docstring contract and the code agree. - **Kind mismatch** (value kind ≠ declared `ParamSpec.kind`): panic `bind: kind mismatch for param \`\``. This preserves the kind guarantee that `lower_items`' per-slice check (`blueprint.rs:599-607`) gives injected params — moved to bind time for bound slots, which bypass that check. - **Binding every param**: leaves `params().is_empty()` — a fully constant param-bearing node, structurally identical to the `SimBroker` precedent. Valid. ## Testing strategy New tests (the GREEN target for `implement`), co-located with the builder / nodes: 1. **`bind_removes_slot_from_param_space`** — `Sma::builder().bind("length", Scalar::I64(2)).schema().params.is_empty()`. Parity with the `SimBroker` precedent (`sma.rs:144`): a bound param-bearing node now reports an empty param surface just like a param-less node. 2. **`bound_node_builds_with_injected_value`** — the bound builder, built with an empty open slice, yields a node behaving as if the value were injected: `Sma::builder().bind("length", Scalar::I64(2)).build(&[]).label() == "SMA(2)"`. 3. **`chained_bind_reconstructs_positional_vector`** — the load-bearing invariant. On `LinComb::builder(2)` (params `weights[0]`, `weights[1]`), bind the two slots to **distinct** values in either order, build, and assert via `eval` that each value landed in its correct positional slot (`Σ weights[i]·input[i]` computes with the right coefficients). Also bind only `weights[0]`, leave `weights[1]` open, build with one injected value, and assert the open value lands in slot 1. 4. **`param_space_reflects_only_open_knobs`** — a `Composite` with a bound node: `param_space()` omits the bound slot's path-qualified name and keeps the open ones (the harness-level assertion from the worked example). 5. **`bind_unknown_slot_panics`** / **`bind_ambiguous_slot_panics`** / **`bind_kind_mismatch_panics`** — `#[should_panic]` on a typo'd name, on a duplicate-named slot (a builder hand-constructed with two same-named `ParamSpec`s), and on a wrong-kind value. Grounding (current-behaviour assumptions the spec rests on, each ratified by a currently-green test): - Each node declares its params by name pre-build → green: `nodes_declare_expected_params` (`sma.rs:123`). - `param_space` aggregates those declared params into a flat, path-qualified space (top-level leaf qualified by its own node segment, not the root name) → green: `param_space_is_flat_path_qualified_and_slot_disambiguated` and `param_space_mirrors_compiled_flat_node_param_order` (`blueprint.rs`). - `lower_items` keys arity / slice / cursor off `builder.params().len()` → green: `wrong_arity_is_a_param_arity_error` (`blueprint.rs`). - A construction value can sit outside `param_space` → green: `SimBroker::builder(0.0001).schema().params.is_empty()` (`sma.rs:144`). ## Acceptance criteria - A strategy author can write `Node::builder().bind("param", value)` for any param-bearing node and get a builder whose `param_space` no longer contains that param, while the node still constructs with the bound value (the worked author example compiles and its assertions hold). - A `Composite` containing a bound node reports a `param_space` that omits the bound knob, so a sweep over the harness enumerates only valid points — never a deformed strategy (criterion: measurably removes a class of invalid sweep members the issue identifies as *wrong*). - The construction layer (`collect_params`, `lower_items`, `param_space`, `compile_with_params`) is unmodified; the only production change is `PrimitiveBuilder::bind`. - Chained and single binds reconstruct the correct positional argument vector for multi-param nodes (invariant test 3 green). - C23 holds: the flat graph is still wired by raw index; bound param names are resolved to positions at authoring time and never reach the flat graph. - No new dependency (C16); no node registry or by-name runtime lookup (C9/C10).