The shipped wording lifted #319's loose "quintet is pure translation"
phrasing into "the research verbs (run, sweep, ...) are sugar — each writes
registered process/campaign documents". Source check (dispatch_run): only
the four verb_sugar bridges (sweep, walkforward, mc, generalize) generate
and register documents; `run` is a direct single backtest, exactly why its
own long help already avoided the desugaring claim. The paragraph now names
the four document-bridged verbs and places run as their single-backtest
sibling — consistent with `run --help`.
Found by re-auditing the shipped prose claims against the source after the
owner asked how I know no error was made (skills-less-cycle experiment,
refs #315): prose claims in help text are exactly the class the green test
suite cannot semantically verify.
claude
162bf849ce