Files
Aura/crates/aura-cli/tests/research_docs.rs
T
Brummel 2f9f3571ae feat(research): RiskRegime vocabulary + CampaignDoc.risk field + validation (#210 T1-2)
The first slice of the risk-regime structural axis (spec/plan abab1f1):

- aura-research: a serializable `RiskRegime` closed vocabulary (externally
  tagged, sole variant `Vol { length, k }` — a content-addressable mirror of
  the shipped two-variant StopRule, so a future Fixed regime is additive), and
  an optional top-level `CampaignDoc.risk: Vec<RiskRegime>` that absent-
  serializes (the `description` precedent) — content-id parity for every
  risk-less document.
- validate_campaign refuses a non-positive regime (length < 1 or k <= 0, NaN
  included) via a new `DocFault::BadRegime`; the CLI renders it as prose at the
  research_docs seam (register/validate paths).
- The three CLI-seam E2E tests pin that a well-formed risk section passes
  `campaign validate` and a bad one is refused with prose (exit 1, no Debug
  leak) — the field is reachable at the seam a data author drives, not only in
  library units.

Adding the field is compile-breaking at every `CampaignDoc { .. }` literal
(serde default does not cover Rust construction), so this slice also threads
`risk: vec![]` into the sites across aura-cli and aura-campaign — the
field-addition's compile-gate completion the plan should have scoped here. The
BadRegime prose reads `risk[i]: ...` (the implementer's terser wording over the
plan's illustrative string; the spec pinned no exact text). Full workspace
suite green.

refs #210
2026-07-06 14:02:33 +02:00

2089 lines
98 KiB
Rust

//! End-to-end coverage for the `aura process` verb family (#188/#189): drives
//! the built `aura` binary over argv/file, the exact surface a data-level
//! author uses.
use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};
use std::sync::{Mutex, MutexGuard, OnceLock};
/// A fresh, unique working directory for a process test that persists
/// content-addressed documents under `./runs/` (so `aura process register`
/// never dirties the repo). Unique per test + per process; no external
/// tempfile dependency (mirrors `cli_run.rs` / `cli_broken_pipe.rs`).
fn temp_cwd(name: &str) -> PathBuf {
let dir = std::env::temp_dir().join(format!("aura-cli-{}-{}", std::process::id(), name));
let _ = std::fs::remove_dir_all(&dir);
std::fs::create_dir_all(&dir).expect("create temp cwd");
dir
}
fn run_code_in(dir: &Path, args: &[&str]) -> (String, Option<i32>) {
let out = std::process::Command::new(env!("CARGO_BIN_EXE_aura"))
.args(args)
.current_dir(dir)
.output()
.expect("binary runs");
let text = format!(
"{}{}",
String::from_utf8_lossy(&out.stdout),
String::from_utf8_lossy(&out.stderr)
);
(text, out.status.code())
}
fn run_code(args: &[&str]) -> (String, Option<i32>) {
run_code_in(Path::new("."), args)
}
const PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "wf-deflated-screen",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "select": "plateau:worst", "deflate": true },
{ "block": "std::gate", "all": [
{ "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "cmp": "gt", "value": 0.0 },
{ "metric": "overfit_probability", "cmp": "lt", "value": 0.1 } ] },
{ "block": "std::walk_forward", "in_sample_ms": 4000, "out_of_sample_ms": 1000,
"step_ms": 1000, "mode": "rolling", "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "select": "argmax" }
]
}"#;
fn write_doc(dir: &Path, name: &str, text: &str) -> PathBuf {
let p = dir.join(name);
std::fs::write(&p, text).expect("write doc");
p
}
#[test]
fn process_validate_reports_intrinsic_ok() {
let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-ok");
write_doc(&dir, "p.process.json", PROCESS_DOC);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "p.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("process document valid (intrinsic): 3 pipeline blocks, 2 gate predicates"));
}
#[test]
fn process_validate_refuses_unknown_metric_as_prose_exit_1() {
let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-bad-metric");
let bad = PROCESS_DOC.replacen(
"net_expectancy_r\", \"select\": \"plateau:worst",
"netto_r\", \"select\": \"plateau:worst",
1,
);
write_doc(&dir, "bad.process.json", &bad);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "bad.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1));
assert!(out.contains("unknown metric \"netto_r\""));
assert!(!out.contains("UnknownMetric"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
#[test]
fn process_validate_refuses_zero_walk_forward_length_as_prose_exit_1() {
let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-zero-wf");
let bad = PROCESS_DOC.replacen("\"step_ms\": 1000", "\"step_ms\": 0", 1);
write_doc(&dir, "bad.process.json", &bad);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "bad.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("pipeline[2]: walk_forward step_ms must be > 0"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(!out.contains("ZeroWalkForwardLength"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// A document authored against the vocabulary `std::walk_forward` carried
/// before cycle 0107 (`folds`/`in_sample_bars`/`out_of_sample_bars`, none of
/// which the engine's `WindowRoller` accepts) is refused end-to-end through
/// the CLI's malformed-document path (a parse failure, distinct from the
/// validate-fault path exercised above) with prose naming the offending
/// slot — never a Debug-formatted `DocError`, never a silent accept of the
/// retired shape.
#[test]
fn process_validate_refuses_retired_walk_forward_vocabulary_as_prose_exit_1() {
let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-retired-wf-vocab");
let bad = PROCESS_DOC.replacen(
"{ \"block\": \"std::walk_forward\", \"in_sample_ms\": 4000, \"out_of_sample_ms\": 1000,\n \"step_ms\": 1000, \"mode\": \"rolling\", \"metric\": \"net_expectancy_r\", \"select\": \"argmax\" }",
"{ \"block\": \"std::walk_forward\", \"folds\": 4, \"in_sample_bars\": 4000, \"out_of_sample_bars\": 1000, \"metric\": \"net_expectancy_r\", \"select\": \"argmax\" }",
1,
);
assert_ne!(bad, PROCESS_DOC, "replacen must actually match the fixture's walk_forward stage");
write_doc(&dir, "bad.process.json", &bad);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "bad.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("unknown slot \"folds\""), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(!out.contains("Malformed"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// The roller's second `RollMode` — `anchored` (growing, origin-fixed
/// in-sample) — round-trips through the CLI's actual validate path, not
/// just the `slot_kind_label` description string: a data author who writes
/// `"mode": "anchored"` gets a valid document, exercising the `WfMode`
/// serde oracle's non-default variant end to end.
#[test]
fn process_validate_accepts_anchored_walk_forward_mode() {
let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-anchored-wf-mode");
let anchored = PROCESS_DOC.replacen("\"mode\": \"rolling\"", "\"mode\": \"anchored\"", 1);
assert_ne!(anchored, PROCESS_DOC, "replacen must actually match the fixture's mode field");
write_doc(&dir, "anchored.process.json", &anchored);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "anchored.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("process document valid (intrinsic): 3 pipeline blocks, 2 gate predicates"));
}
#[test]
fn process_introspect_vocabulary_block_and_content_id() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--vocabulary"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
for id in ["std::sweep", "std::gate", "std::walk_forward", "std::monte_carlo", "std::generalize"] {
assert!(out.contains(id), "vocabulary misses {id}: {out}");
}
let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--block", "std::sweep"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
assert!(out.contains("metric"));
// The selection group (metric/select/deflate) is optional — a sweep with
// no selection is a terminal, selection-free stage (#210).
assert!(out.contains("optional"));
let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--block", "std::walk_forward"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
for slot in ["in_sample_ms", "out_of_sample_ms", "step_ms", "mode"] {
assert!(out.contains(slot), "walk_forward describe misses {slot}: {out}");
}
assert!(out.contains("one of: rolling | anchored"), "mode label missing: {out}");
assert!(!out.contains("folds"), "retired slot still advertised: {out}");
let dir = temp_cwd("process-introspect-content-id");
write_doc(&dir, "p.process.json", PROCESS_DOC);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "introspect", "--content-id", "p.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
// #194: --content-id prints the bare 64-hex id (matching `graph introspect
// --content-id` and the store filename), no glued `content:` display prefix.
let line = out.lines().last().expect("id line").trim();
assert_eq!(line.len(), 64, "bare 64-hex id, no content: prefix: {out}");
assert!(line.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_hexdigit()), "bare hex id: {out}");
assert!(!out.contains("content:"), "--content-id must not glue the content: prefix: {out}");
}
#[test]
fn process_introspect_unknown_block_is_prose_exit_1() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--block", "std::nope"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("unknown block \"std::nope\""), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
}
#[test]
fn process_introspect_unwired_lists_open_slots() {
let dir = temp_cwd("process-introspect-unwired");
// std::gate's "all" slot is required (unlike std::sweep's now-optional
// selection group, #210), so it still exercises the pipeline-level open
// slot listing alongside the top-level "name" slot.
let partial = r#"{ "format_version": 1, "kind": "process",
"pipeline": [ { "block": "std::gate" } ] }"#;
write_doc(&dir, "partial.process.json", partial);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "introspect", "--unwired", "partial.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
assert!(out.contains("open slot: name"));
assert!(out.contains("open slot: pipeline[0].all"));
}
#[test]
fn process_introspect_no_flag_is_usage_exit_2() {
let (_out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(2));
}
/// #197 (fieldtest 0107 F9): the metric roster is enumerable from the public
/// surface. `aura process introspect --metrics` lists every name in
/// `aura_research::metric_vocabulary()` (17), each annotated with where it is
/// applicable — `rankable` (a sweep/walk_forward `select` metric, from
/// `aura_campaign::RANKABLE_METRICS`), `gate` (a gate-predicate per-member
/// scalar, from `aura_campaign::PER_MEMBER_METRICS`), or `annotation` (in
/// neither roster — a selection annotation that can neither rank nor gate). The
/// split the executor enforces at preflight (a metric may exist yet not be
/// rankable, F9) is thereby readable before any trial run. #207 (fieldtest
/// 0108 F8) adds a fourth tag `generalize` on the rankable R-expectancy family
/// (`expectancy_r`, `net_expectancy_r`, `sqn`, `sqn_normalized`) — exactly the
/// names `aura_registry::check_r_metric` accepts, i.e. std::generalize's
/// cross-instrument accept-set — so an author can read WHICH metrics generalize
/// before authoring the stage. A rankable non-R metric (`total_pips`) and an
/// R-denominated-but-unranked metric (`max_r_drawdown`) both stay OUT of it:
/// the tag tracks `check_r_metric`, not the presence of `_r` in the name.
/// Substrings are pinned, not exact column widths.
#[test]
fn process_introspect_metrics_lists_vocabulary_with_applicability() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--metrics"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
// One line per vocabulary name, nothing else — the whole 17-name roster.
let lines: Vec<&str> = out.lines().filter(|l| !l.trim().is_empty()).collect();
assert_eq!(lines.len(), 17, "one line per metric_vocabulary() name: {out}");
// Locate a metric's line by its exact name column (first whitespace token),
// so `expectancy_r` never matches `net_expectancy_r`'s line.
let line_for = |name: &str| -> String {
out.lines()
.find(|l| l.split_whitespace().next() == Some(name))
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("no line for {name}: {out}"))
.to_string()
};
// expectancy_r is BOTH rankable and a per-member gate scalar.
let er = line_for("expectancy_r");
assert!(er.contains("rankable") && er.contains("gate"), "expectancy_r tags: {er}");
// total_pips likewise (a rankable scalar that is also per-member).
let tp = line_for("total_pips");
assert!(tp.contains("rankable") && tp.contains("gate"), "total_pips tags: {tp}");
// win_rate is per-member (gate) but NOT rankable.
let wr = line_for("win_rate");
assert!(wr.contains("gate") && !wr.contains("rankable"), "win_rate tags: {wr}");
// deflated_score is a selection annotation — in neither roster.
let ds = line_for("deflated_score");
assert!(ds.contains("annotation"), "deflated_score tag: {ds}");
// #207: the four rankable R-expectancy names — std::generalize's
// cross-instrument accept-set (aura_registry::check_r_metric) — carry the
// `generalize` tag, so an author reads WHICH metrics generalize from the
// roster instead of guessing at the stage.
for name in ["expectancy_r", "net_expectancy_r", "sqn", "sqn_normalized"] {
let l = line_for(name);
assert!(l.contains("generalize"), "{name} must carry the generalize tag: {l}");
}
// A rankable-but-not-R metric (total_pips) and an R-DENOMINATED-but-unranked
// metric (max_r_drawdown, a drawdown IN R) both stay out of the generalize
// set: the tag tracks check_r_metric, never the `_r` in the name.
assert!(!tp.contains("generalize"), "total_pips must not carry generalize: {tp}");
let mrd = line_for("max_r_drawdown");
assert!(!mrd.contains("generalize"), "max_r_drawdown must not carry generalize: {mrd}");
}
/// `--metrics` joins the existing one-mode guard: exactly one introspect mode
/// is allowed, so `--metrics` alongside another mode refuses with the usage
/// line (exit 2), and that usage line is extended to advertise `--metrics` as
/// one of the modes. (The guard's own `Usage: aura process introspect
/// --vocabulary …` line is asserted — never clap's unknown-arg error, which
/// spells the flag list as `[OPTIONS]`.)
#[test]
fn process_introspect_metrics_plus_another_mode_is_usage_exit_2() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--metrics", "--vocabulary"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(2), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("Usage: aura process introspect --vocabulary"),
"the one-mode guard usage line must fire: {out}"
);
assert!(out.contains("--metrics"), "the usage line must advertise --metrics: {out}");
}
#[test]
fn process_register_stores_content_addressed_under_runs_root() {
let dir = temp_cwd("process-register");
write_doc(&dir, "p.process.json", PROCESS_DOC);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "register", "p.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
// #194: the register verb prints the bare id — `registered process <id> (<path>)`.
let line = out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("registered process ")).expect("line");
assert!(!line.contains("content:"), "register line prints the bare id, no content: prefix: {line}");
let id = line
.trim_start_matches("registered process ")
.split(' ')
.next()
.expect("id");
assert!(dir.join("runs").join("processes").join(format!("{id}.json")).is_file());
}
/// The demo-project fixture (Aura.toml present), built once — mirrors
/// `project_load.rs`'s `built_fixture` (a separate test binary, so it needs
/// its own `OnceLock`, but `cargo build` is idempotent).
fn built_project() -> &'static PathBuf {
static BUILT: OnceLock<PathBuf> = OnceLock::new();
BUILT.get_or_init(|| {
let dir = Path::new(env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR")).join("tests/fixtures/demo-project");
let out = std::process::Command::new("cargo")
.arg("build")
.current_dir(&dir)
.output()
.expect("spawn cargo build for the fixture project");
assert!(
out.status.success(),
"fixture build failed:\n{}",
String::from_utf8_lossy(&out.stderr)
);
dir
})
}
/// Serializes every test that touches the shared demo-project fixture store
/// (they remove/re-seed `<fixture>/runs`, so parallel test threads would race
/// on it). A poisoned lock is taken over: one failed test must not cascade
/// into unrelated lock panics.
fn project_lock() -> MutexGuard<'static, ()> {
static LOCK: Mutex<()> = Mutex::new(());
LOCK.lock().unwrap_or_else(|e| e.into_inner())
}
/// A scratch filesystem entry this test writes under the git-tracked
/// demo-project fixture root (only `runs/` there is fixture-gitignored),
/// removed on drop — including during a mid-test panic — so a failed
/// assertion never leaks scratch docs into tracked working-tree state.
enum ScratchPath {
File(PathBuf),
Dir(PathBuf),
}
struct ScratchGuard(Vec<ScratchPath>);
impl Drop for ScratchGuard {
fn drop(&mut self) {
for p in &self.0 {
match p {
ScratchPath::File(p) => {
let _ = std::fs::remove_file(p);
}
ScratchPath::Dir(p) => {
let _ = std::fs::remove_dir_all(p);
}
}
}
}
}
/// The `aura campaign validate` referential tier (the campaign family's
/// headline addition over the intrinsic-only process family), exercised at
/// the CLI seam inside a real project: a fully-resolved document prints the
/// "valid (referential)" success line, and an unresolved reference prints
/// the "do not resolve" fault block through `ref_fault_prose`. The
/// constituents (`validate_campaign_refs`, `ref_fault_prose`) are unit-
/// tested elsewhere; this pins that `aura campaign validate` actually wires
/// them together end to end.
#[test]
fn campaign_validate_in_project_reports_referential_tier_end_to_end() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("seed.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("ref-ok.campaign.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("ref-bad.campaign.json")),
]);
// Seed one real, content-addressed, open-param blueprint into the
// project's own store via a real sweep (mirrors `project_load.rs`'s
// anchor test).
let open_bp = format!("{}/tests/fixtures/sma_signal_open.json", env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR"));
let (sweep_out, sweep_code) = run_code_in(
dir,
&[
"sweep",
&open_bp,
"--axis",
"sma_signal.fast.length=2,4",
"--axis",
"sma_signal.slow.length=8,16",
"--name",
"campaign-ref-seed",
],
);
assert_eq!(sweep_code, Some(0), "seed sweep failed: {sweep_out}");
let bp_id = std::fs::read_dir(runs_dir.join("blueprints"))
.expect("blueprints dir")
.next()
.expect("one stored blueprint")
.expect("dir entry")
.path()
.file_stem()
.expect("stem")
.to_string_lossy()
.into_owned();
// Register a valid AND executable process into the same project store:
// this test's OK campaign must pass all three validate tiers, and
// PROCESS_DOC's sweep (deflate: true + plateau:worst) is intrinsically
// valid but statically refused by the executor preflight (#205's third
// tier) — so the referential fixture gets an argmax/no-deflate twin.
let exec_process = PROCESS_DOC
.replacen(
"\"select\": \"plateau:worst\", \"deflate\": true",
"\"select\": \"argmax\", \"deflate\": false",
1,
)
// ... and its gate predicates over the annotation metric
// overfit_probability (not per-member) flip to a per-member scalar.
.replacen("\"overfit_probability\", \"cmp\": \"lt\", \"value\": 0.1", "\"win_rate\", \"cmp\": \"lt\", \"value\": 1.1", 1);
assert_ne!(exec_process, PROCESS_DOC, "replacen must match the sweep stage");
write_doc(dir, "seed.process.json", &exec_process);
let (proc_out, proc_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["process", "register", "seed.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(proc_code, Some(0), "seed process register failed: {proc_out}");
let proc_id = proc_out
.lines()
.find(|l| l.starts_with("registered process "))
.expect("register line")
.trim_start_matches("registered process ")
.split(' ')
.next()
.expect("id")
.trim_start_matches("content:")
.to_string();
// "fast.length": the axis name is the RAW composite's `param_space` name.
// `validate_campaign_refs` loads the stored blueprint bare, unlike the
// sweep's `wrap_r`-wrapped axis probe, so it does NOT carry the
// "sma_signal." prefix `aura sweep --axis` binds against.
let campaign = format!(
r#"{{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "campaign",
"name": "ref-check",
"data": {{ "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ {{ "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 }} ] }},
"strategies": [ {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{bp}" }},
"axes": {{ "fast.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [2] }},
"slow.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [6] }} }} }} ],
"process": {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{proc}" }} }},
"seed": 1,
"presentation": {{ "persist_taps": [], "emit": ["family_table"] }}
}}"#,
bp = bp_id,
proc = proc_id
);
write_doc(dir, "ref-ok.campaign.json", &campaign);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "validate", "ref-ok.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains(
"campaign document valid (referential): all references resolve, axes are in the param space"
));
// An unresolved process reference: the fault block + `ref_fault_prose`
// mapping, prose exit 1, at the same CLI seam.
let bad = campaign.replace(&proc_id, "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000");
write_doc(dir, "ref-bad.campaign.json", &bad);
let (out2, code2) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "validate", "ref-bad.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code2, Some(1));
assert!(out2.contains("campaign references do not resolve:"), "stdout/stderr: {out2}");
assert!(out2.contains("not found in the project store"), "stdout/stderr: {out2}");
// `_cleanup` (a `ScratchGuard`) removes the scratch docs and `runs/` on
// drop, at the end of this scope — including on a mid-test panic.
}
const CAMPAIGN_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "campaign",
"name": "screen",
"data": { "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ { "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 } ] },
"strategies": [ { "ref": { "content_id": "9f3a" },
"axes": { "fast": { "kind": "I64", "values": [8] } } } ],
"process": { "ref": { "content_id": "4e2d" } },
"seed": 1,
"presentation": { "persist_taps": [], "emit": ["family_table"] }
}"#;
#[test]
fn campaign_validate_outside_project_skips_referential_tier() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-validate-outside-project");
write_doc(&dir, "c.campaign.json", CAMPAIGN_DOC);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "validate", "c.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("campaign document valid (intrinsic):"));
assert!(out.contains("referential checks skipped (no Aura.toml found up from "));
}
#[test]
fn campaign_validate_refuses_empty_axis_prose_exit_1() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-validate-empty-axis");
let bad = CAMPAIGN_DOC.replacen(r#""values": [8]"#, r#""values": []"#, 1);
write_doc(&dir, "bad.campaign.json", &bad);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "validate", "bad.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1));
assert!(out.contains("axes.fast: an axis is a non-empty finite set"));
assert!(!out.contains("EmptyAxis"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// #210 risk-regime axis: a campaign document carrying a `risk` section
/// round-trips through the CLI's actual `campaign validate` binary path
/// (parse -> `validate_campaign`) without a fault. Before this iteration the
/// `RiskRegime`/`CampaignDoc.risk` wiring was proven only inside
/// `aura-research`'s own unit tests; this pins that the new field is actually
/// reachable — and accepted when well-formed — at the CLI seam a data author
/// drives, not merely inside the library.
#[test]
fn campaign_validate_accepts_a_valid_risk_section_end_to_end() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-validate-risk-ok");
let with_risk = CAMPAIGN_DOC.replacen(
"\"seed\": 1,",
"\"seed\": 1,\n \"risk\": [ { \"vol\": { \"length\": 3, \"k\": 1.5 } } ],",
1,
);
assert_ne!(with_risk, CAMPAIGN_DOC, "replacen must actually match the fixture's seed field");
write_doc(&dir, "risk-ok.campaign.json", &with_risk);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "validate", "risk-ok.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("campaign document valid (intrinsic):"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(!out.contains("BadRegime"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// #210: a non-positive stop regime (`k <= 0`, here `k: 0.0`) is refused by
/// `validate_campaign`'s `DocFault::BadRegime` and — the property under test —
/// that fault reaches the CLI's `doc_fault_prose` mapping end to end: exit 1,
/// prose naming the offending index and BOTH malformed fields ("stop length
/// must be >= 1 and k must be > 0"), never the bare `BadRegime` Debug variant.
#[test]
fn campaign_validate_refuses_bad_risk_regime_prose_exit_1() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-validate-risk-bad");
let with_bad_risk = CAMPAIGN_DOC.replacen(
"\"seed\": 1,",
"\"seed\": 1,\n \"risk\": [ { \"vol\": { \"length\": 3, \"k\": 0.0 } } ],",
1,
);
assert_ne!(with_bad_risk, CAMPAIGN_DOC, "replacen must actually match the fixture's seed field");
write_doc(&dir, "risk-bad.campaign.json", &with_bad_risk);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "validate", "risk-bad.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("risk[0]: stop length must be >= 1 and k must be > 0"),
"stdout/stderr: {out}"
);
assert!(!out.contains("BadRegime"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_vocabulary_lists_sections() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect", "--vocabulary"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
for id in ["std::data", "std::strategy", "std::process_ref", "std::presentation"] {
assert!(out.contains(id), "vocabulary misses {id}: {out}");
}
}
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_unwired_reports_the_spec_example_slots() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-introspect-unwired");
let draft = r#"{ "format_version": 1, "kind": "campaign", "name": "draft",
"data": { "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ { "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 } ] },
"strategies": [ { "ref": { "content_id": "9f3a" },
"axes": { "slow": { "kind": "I64", "values": [] } } } ],
"seed": 1,
"presentation": { "persist_taps": [], "emit": [] } }"#;
write_doc(&dir, "draft.campaign.json", draft);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "introspect", "--unwired", "draft.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
assert!(out.contains("open slot: process.ref (required, content id of a process document)"));
assert!(out.contains("open slot: strategies[0].axes.slow (axis declared empty — a P1 axis is a non-empty finite set)"));
}
/// #195 (fieldtest 0106 F4): the consumer view of the placeholder-ref probe.
/// A draft that spells its open refs as `"ref": {}` / `"ref": null` — the
/// natural drafting placeholders — has `--unwired` enumerate BOTH as open slots
/// (exit 0), instead of the old cryptic serde refusal / silent "no open slots".
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_unwired_reports_placeholder_refs() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-introspect-unwired-placeholder");
let draft = r#"{ "format_version": 1, "kind": "campaign", "name": "draft",
"data": { "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ { "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 } ] },
"strategies": [ { "ref": null,
"axes": { "slow": { "kind": "I64", "values": [10, 20] } } } ],
"process": { "ref": {} },
"seed": 1,
"presentation": { "persist_taps": [], "emit": [] } }"#;
write_doc(&dir, "draft.campaign.json", draft);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "introspect", "--unwired", "draft.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("open slot: strategies[0].ref (required, one of: content_id, identity_id)"),
"strategy `ref: null` placeholder not enumerated: {out}"
);
assert!(
out.contains("open slot: process.ref (required, content id of a process document)"),
"process `ref: {{}}` placeholder not enumerated: {out}"
);
}
/// The campaign twin of `process_introspect_vocabulary_block_and_content_id`'s
/// `--content-id` branch: pins that `campaign introspect --content-id` wires
/// `parse_valid_campaign` + `campaign_to_json` + `content_id_of` end to end
/// (the process branch was covered; this one was not).
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_content_id_prints_hash() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-introspect-content-id");
write_doc(&dir, "c.campaign.json", CAMPAIGN_DOC);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "introspect", "--content-id", "c.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
// #194: --content-id prints the bare 64-hex id, no glued `content:` prefix.
let line = out.lines().last().expect("id line").trim();
assert_eq!(line.len(), 64, "bare 64-hex id, no content: prefix: {out}");
assert!(line.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_hexdigit()), "bare hex id: {out}");
assert!(!out.contains("content:"), "--content-id must not glue the content: prefix: {out}");
}
#[test]
fn campaign_register_stores_content_addressed_under_runs_root() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-register");
write_doc(&dir, "c.campaign.json", CAMPAIGN_DOC);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "register", "c.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
// #194: the register verb prints the bare id — `registered campaign <id> (<path>)`.
let line = out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("registered campaign ")).expect("line");
assert!(!line.contains("content:"), "register line prints the bare id, no content: prefix: {line}");
let id = line
.trim_start_matches("registered campaign ")
.split(' ')
.next()
.expect("id");
assert!(dir.join("runs").join("campaigns").join(format!("{id}.json")).is_file());
}
/// `guard_one_mode` is shared, family-parameterized code (`process` and
/// `campaign` both route through it). The process family already pins the
/// zero-flags arm; this pins that the campaign family gets its own family
/// name threaded into the usage line, not a copy-pasted "process" string.
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_no_flag_usage_names_the_campaign_family() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(2), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("Usage: aura campaign introspect --vocabulary | --block <ID> | --unwired <FILE> | --content-id <FILE>"),
"stdout/stderr: {out}"
);
}
/// `guard_one_mode` requires *exactly* one mode: the zero-flags arm is
/// pinned elsewhere, but nothing previously exercised the over-selection
/// arm (`selected_modes() != 1` is not just `== 0`). Two modes at once must
/// refuse with the same usage-exit-2 idiom, not silently pick one.
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_two_flags_is_usage_exit_2() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect", "--vocabulary", "--block", "std::data"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(2), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("Usage: aura campaign introspect"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
}
/// #197: the metrics roster is process-side R-vocabulary, but `--metrics` rides
/// the shared `DocIntrospectCmd` both families route through, so `aura campaign
/// introspect --metrics` WORKS too rather than usage-refusing. Ground for the
/// pin: a mode the shared struct carries needs no per-family exclusion, and the
/// vocabulary a campaign's referenced process must name is thus discoverable
/// from the campaign verb as well (simplest honest reading). Same annotated
/// roster as the process family.
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_metrics_also_lists_the_vocabulary() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect", "--metrics"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
let er = out
.lines()
.find(|l| l.split_whitespace().next() == Some("expectancy_r"))
.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("no expectancy_r line: {out}"));
assert!(er.contains("rankable") && er.contains("gate"), "expectancy_r tags: {er}");
assert!(
out.lines()
.any(|l| l.split_whitespace().next() == Some("deflated_score") && l.contains("annotation")),
"the annotation roster is reachable from the campaign family too: {out}"
);
}
/// 0109 task 1 (#201 decision 1): the closed tap vocabulary is discoverable
/// through the actual CLI binary, not just the `aura-research` library —
/// `campaign introspect --block std::presentation` composes
/// `describe_block` + `slot_kind_label` over the new `SlotKind::TapKinds`,
/// and this pins that composition reaches stdout with the exact four names,
/// so a future edit to `tap_vocabulary()` that forgets the CLI-visible label
/// (there is no other CLI test exercising `--block std::presentation`) fails
/// here instead of only in a library-level unit test.
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_block_presentation_names_the_tap_vocabulary() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect", "--block", "std::presentation"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("list of: equity | exposure | r_equity | net_r_equity"),
"the block description must name the closed tap vocabulary: {out}"
);
assert!(out.contains("persist_taps"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
}
/// #193 (narrowed scope, cycle-0107 F3): the whole document envelope IS
/// derivable — `introspect --unwired` over a bare `{}` enumerates every
/// top-level field (seed, data, strategies, process.ref, presentation) as an
/// open slot — but nothing pointed the author there, so the 0106 round
/// iterated blind `validate` errors instead of starting from the skeleton.
/// The shared `--unwired` help line now carries the skeleton hint naming that
/// starting move, making it discoverable from `--help` alone (the process and
/// campaign families share `DocIntrospectCmd`, so pinning one covers both).
/// Whitespace is normalized before matching so clap's help-column wrapping
/// (terminal-width dependent) can never split the pinned phrase.
#[test]
fn introspect_help_hints_the_bare_envelope_probe() {
let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect", "--help"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "clap --help exits 0: {out}");
let flat = out.split_whitespace().collect::<Vec<_>>().join(" ");
assert!(
flat.contains("start from a bare {}"),
"the --unwired help line must point at the bare-{{}} envelope probe: {out}"
);
}
/// #193 (narrowed scope, cycle-0106 F1): a document whose `kind` key carries
/// the wrong value — the blind-author trap of pointing `process validate` at
/// a campaign-kind file — is refused with prose that NAMES the `kind` key the
/// author must fix ("the \"kind\" key must be \"process\""), instead of the
/// opaque "wrong document kind" that never told them WHICH field to change.
/// Autonomous: a minimal campaign-kind envelope written inline, refused at the
/// envelope check before any deserialization (exit 1), Debug-free.
#[test]
fn wrong_kind_refusal_names_the_kind_key() {
let dir = temp_cwd("wrong-kind-names-key");
write_doc(
&dir,
"mislabeled.process.json",
r#"{ "format_version": 1, "kind": "campaign", "name": "x", "pipeline": [] }"#,
);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "mislabeled.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("the \"kind\" key must be \"process\""),
"the refusal must name the kind key the author must fix: {out}"
);
assert!(!out.contains("WrongKind"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// Register must be a gate, not a passthrough: an invalid document is
/// refused with prose (exit 1) and — the property that matters for a
/// content-addressed store — no file is ever written under `runs/campaigns/`
/// for it. A store that could contain unvalidated documents would make
/// every downstream reader re-derive the checks register was supposed to
/// have already made.
#[test]
fn campaign_register_refuses_invalid_document_and_writes_nothing() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-register-invalid");
let bad = CAMPAIGN_DOC.replacen(r#""values": [8]"#, r#""values": []"#, 1);
write_doc(&dir, "bad.campaign.json", &bad);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "register", "bad.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("refusing to register:"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("axes.fast: an axis is a non-empty finite set"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
!dir.join("runs").join("campaigns").exists(),
"register must not create a store entry for an invalid document"
);
}
/// #210: the register validate-gate extends to the new risk axis — a
/// document whose only fault is a non-positive stop regime is refused with
/// prose (exit 1) and, the property that matters for a content-addressed
/// store, no file is ever written under `runs/campaigns/`. A store that
/// accepted a document because register only checked the OLD fault kinds
/// would silently persist an unenforceable risk regime.
#[test]
fn campaign_register_refuses_invalid_risk_section_and_writes_nothing() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-register-invalid-risk");
let bad = CAMPAIGN_DOC.replacen(
"\"seed\": 1,",
"\"seed\": 1,\n \"risk\": [ { \"vol\": { \"length\": 0, \"k\": 2.0 } } ],",
1,
);
assert_ne!(bad, CAMPAIGN_DOC, "replacen must actually match the fixture's seed field");
write_doc(&dir, "bad-risk.campaign.json", &bad);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "register", "bad-risk.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("refusing to register:"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("risk[0]: stop length must be >= 1 and k must be > 0"),
"stdout/stderr: {out}"
);
assert!(
!dir.join("runs").join("campaigns").exists(),
"register must not create a store entry for an invalid risk section"
);
}
/// Seed one open-param blueprint into the built demo project's store via a
/// real sweep and return its content id (the referential test's recipe).
fn seed_blueprint(dir: &Path, name: &str) -> String {
let open_bp = format!("{}/tests/fixtures/sma_signal_open.json", env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR"));
let (out, code) = run_code_in(
dir,
&[
"sweep",
&open_bp,
"--axis",
"sma_signal.fast.length=2,4",
"--axis",
"sma_signal.slow.length=8,16",
"--name",
name,
],
);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "seed sweep failed: {out}");
std::fs::read_dir(dir.join("runs").join("blueprints"))
.expect("blueprints dir")
.next()
.expect("one stored blueprint")
.expect("dir entry")
.path()
.file_stem()
.expect("stem")
.to_string_lossy()
.into_owned()
}
/// Register `doc` as a process document in the project store; returns its id.
/// Asserts register exits 0 — an intrinsically valid document (annotator
/// stages in any order included) must always register; only `campaign run`'s
/// preflight draws the executable-shape line.
fn register_process_doc(dir: &Path, file: &str, doc: &str) -> String {
write_doc(dir, file, doc);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["process", "register", file]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "process register failed: {out}");
out.lines()
.find(|l| l.starts_with("registered process "))
.expect("register line")
.trim_start_matches("registered process ")
.split(' ')
.next()
.expect("id")
.trim_start_matches("content:")
.to_string()
}
/// A referentially-resolving campaign over the seeded blueprint. Axes name
/// the RAW `param_space` names (`fast.length` / `slow.length` — see the
/// naming note in the referential test above). `persist_taps`/`emit` are
/// spliced verbatim (pass `""` for empty, `"\"family_table\""` etc.).
fn campaign_doc_json(
bp_id: &str,
proc_id: &str,
window: (i64, i64),
persist_taps: &str,
emit: &str,
) -> String {
format!(
r#"{{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "campaign",
"name": "run-seam",
"data": {{ "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ {{ "from_ms": {from}, "to_ms": {to} }} ] }},
"strategies": [ {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{bp_id}" }},
"axes": {{ "fast.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [2, 4] }},
"slow.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [8, 16] }} }} }} ],
"process": {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{proc_id}" }} }},
"seed": 7,
"presentation": {{ "persist_taps": [{persist_taps}], "emit": [{emit}] }}
}}"#,
from = window.0,
to = window.1,
)
}
/// An mc-bearing process: intrinsically valid AND (since the v2 executor) an
/// executable pipeline shape — `sweep -> monte_carlo` annotates each sweep
/// survivor. The two addressing-mode tests below run it over the [1, 2] 1970
/// window, so they refuse deterministically at the member-data seam.
const MC_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "mc-screen",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
{ "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 100, "block_len": 5 }
]
}"#;
/// Intrinsically valid but NOT an executable v2 shape: the annotator sits
/// before the population stage (`walk_forward` after `monte_carlo`). The
/// intrinsic tier deliberately permits this order (the shipped
/// `validate_process_permits_walk_forward_after_an_annotator` pin in
/// aura-research), so register accepts it; only `campaign run`'s preflight
/// refuses it.
const MC_BEFORE_WF_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "mc-before-wf",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
{ "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 100, "block_len": 5 },
{ "block": "std::walk_forward", "in_sample_ms": 1209600000, "out_of_sample_ms": 604800000,
"step_ms": 604800000, "mode": "rolling", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" }
]
}"#;
/// An executable generalize-bearing shape (`sweep -> generalize`). The
/// refusal under test is the campaign-side static guard (std::generalize
/// needs >= 2 instruments), not the pipeline shape.
const GENERALIZE_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "gen-screen",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
{ "block": "std::generalize", "metric": "net_expectancy_r" }
]
}"#;
/// The minimal executable pipeline (one sweep stage).
const SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "sweep-only",
"pipeline": [ { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" } ]
}"#;
/// The full annotated shape for the gated e2e: sweep -> gate -> walk_forward
/// -> monte_carlo. The gate (`n_trades ge 0`) passes every member, so
/// walk-forward always has survivors; the mc annotator bootstraps the pooled
/// per-window OOS trade-R series (200 resamples, block 5). Roller: 14d IS /
/// 7d OOS / 7d step in epoch-ms, tiling the ~30-day GER40 Sept-2024 campaign
/// window. NO generalize stage: this campaign has ONE instrument (a second
/// local archive is not guaranteed), and the single-instrument refusal is
/// pinned data-free in `campaign_run_refuses_single_instrument_generalize`.
const WF_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "screen-then-walkforward",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
{ "block": "std::gate", "all": [ { "metric": "n_trades", "cmp": "ge", "value": 0.0 } ] },
{ "block": "std::walk_forward", "in_sample_ms": 1209600000, "out_of_sample_ms": 604800000,
"step_ms": 604800000, "mode": "rolling", "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "select": "argmax" },
{ "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 200, "block_len": 5 }
]
}"#;
/// `campaign run` outside a project refuses up front — before target
/// resolution, so not even the file-sugar registration touches a store.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_outside_project_refuses() {
let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-run-outside-project");
write_doc(&dir, "c.campaign.json", CAMPAIGN_DOC);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "run", "c.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("campaign run needs a project"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
!dir.join("runs").exists(),
"a refused run must not create a store outside a project"
);
}
/// A target that is neither a readable file nor a 64-hex id refuses naming
/// both readings (inside the project, past the project gate).
#[test]
fn campaign_run_bogus_target_refuses() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "no-such-target"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("'no-such-target' is neither a readable .json file nor a 64-hex content id"),
"stdout/stderr: {out}"
);
}
/// A well-formed but unknown content id refuses with the store-miss prose.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_unknown_id_refuses() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let id = "0".repeat(64);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", &id]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains(&format!("no campaign {id} in the project store")),
"stdout/stderr: {out}"
);
}
/// Property: the recorded campaign realizations are READABLE BACK. A read-back
/// verb (`aura campaign runs`) both lists every stored campaign-run record on a
/// scannable line carrying its campaign id, and — addressed by that id — dumps
/// the BARE persisted store record (the `campaign_runs.jsonl` line form), NOT
/// the `{"campaign_run": …}` stdout wrapper the `campaign run` emit uses (F10,
/// fieldtest 0108). Today `runs` is an unrecognized campaign subcommand (clap
/// exit 2) — the feature is absent.
///
/// Hermetic seed: one hand-written record line in the exact bare store form
/// serde emits (mirroring the aura-registry pre-widening parse line —
/// canonical field order, sparse-skip fields omitted — so a re-serialized dump
/// is byte-identical). Appending a real record needs a full campaign run over
/// data; hand-writing the store line is the only data-free path and pins the
/// bare-store-line contract exactly.
#[test]
fn campaign_runs_lists_and_dumps_the_bare_stored_record() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
std::fs::create_dir_all(&runs_dir).expect("create runs dir");
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone())]);
let campaign_id = "deadbeef".repeat(8); // a 64-hex content id
let record_line = format!(
r#"{{"campaign":"{campaign_id}","process":"beef","run":0,"seed":42,"cells":[{{"strategy":"3f9c","instrument":"GER40","window_ms":[1725148800000,1727740799999],"stages":[{{"block":"std::sweep","family_id":"sweep-0"}},{{"block":"std::gate","survivor_ordinals":[0,1,2,3]}}]}}]}}"#
);
std::fs::write(runs_dir.join("campaign_runs.jsonl"), format!("{record_line}\n"))
.expect("seed the campaign-run store");
// LIST mode: one scannable line per stored record, carrying the campaign
// id (bare 64-hex or a prefix), exit 0.
let (list_out, list_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "runs"]);
assert_eq!(list_code, Some(0), "list exits 0: {list_out}");
assert!(
list_out.contains(&campaign_id[..8]),
"the list line carries the campaign id (bare or prefix): {list_out}"
);
// DUMP mode: addressed by the campaign content id, prints the BARE stored
// record line — the store form, NOT the `{{"campaign_run": …}}` run-emit
// wrapper (F10) — byte-identical to the seeded line, exit 0.
let (dump_out, dump_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "runs", &campaign_id]);
assert_eq!(dump_code, Some(0), "dump exits 0: {dump_out}");
assert!(
!dump_out.contains("\"campaign_run\""),
"dump prints the bare store record, not the run-emit wrapper (F10): {dump_out}"
);
assert_eq!(
dump_out.trim(),
record_line,
"dump is byte-identical to the bare stored line (F10): {dump_out}"
);
}
/// 0109 task 2: `campaign runs <id>` dumps by deserializing the stored line
/// into `CampaignRunRecord` and re-serializing it (`research_docs.rs`'s
/// `campaign_runs` — "serde round-trip == the stored bytes"), so the
/// byte-identical contract `campaign_runs_lists_and_dumps_the_bare_stored_record`
/// pins above is only proven for a record where `trace_name` is absent
/// (pre-0109 shape). This is the same round-trip pinned with the new field
/// POPULATED: a stored line carrying `"trace_name":"deadbeef-3"` must dump
/// back byte-identical — the new field's declaration position (after
/// `generalizations`) and its `skip_serializing_if` must not perturb the
/// existing sparse-skip / declaration-order contract the read-back verb
/// depends on.
#[test]
fn campaign_runs_dump_round_trips_a_populated_trace_name() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
std::fs::create_dir_all(&runs_dir).expect("create runs dir");
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone())]);
let campaign_id = "deadbeef".repeat(8);
let record_line = format!(
r#"{{"campaign":"{campaign_id}","process":"beef","run":3,"seed":42,"cells":[{{"strategy":"3f9c","instrument":"GER40","window_ms":[1725148800000,1727740799999],"stages":[{{"block":"std::sweep","family_id":"sweep-0"}}]}}],"trace_name":"deadbeef-3"}}"#
);
std::fs::write(runs_dir.join("campaign_runs.jsonl"), format!("{record_line}\n"))
.expect("seed the campaign-run store");
let (dump_out, dump_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "runs", &campaign_id]);
assert_eq!(dump_code, Some(0), "dump exits 0: {dump_out}");
assert_eq!(
dump_out.trim(),
record_line,
"a populated trace_name round-trips byte-identical through the read-back verb: {dump_out}"
);
}
/// The v2 boundary, order side: `[sweep, monte_carlo, walk_forward]` is
/// intrinsically valid — `process register` ACCEPTS it (asserted inside
/// `register_process_doc`; the intrinsic-tier ground is the shipped
/// `validate_process_permits_walk_forward_after_an_annotator` pin) — but the
/// executable pipeline shape fixes the suffix order (`std::sweep [std::gate]*
/// [std::walk_forward]? [std::monte_carlo]? [std::generalize]?`), so
/// `campaign run` refuses it at the data-free preflight, before any member
/// runs, with Debug-free PipelineShape prose.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_mc_before_walk_forward() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mcwf.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mcwf.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-mcwf-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "mcwf.process.json", MC_BEFORE_WF_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "mcwf.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "mcwf.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("process pipeline is not executable:"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("std::walk_forward cannot follow std::monte_carlo"),
"the detail names the ordering violation: {out}"
);
assert!(!out.contains("not executable in v1"), "retired v1 prose resurfaced: {out}");
assert!(!out.contains("PipelineShape"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// A v2 process doc whose `std::sweep` carries no selection group (no
/// `metric`/`select`) followed by a `std::gate` stage: intrinsically valid
/// (`process register` accepts a selection-free sweep as any other stage
/// shape) but not an executable v2 shape, since a selection-free sweep is
/// permitted ONLY as the terminal stage of its process (#210's terminal
/// rule — the executor's preflight rule, not the intrinsic validator's).
const SELECTION_FREE_SWEEP_THEN_GATE_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "sweep-then-gate-no-selection",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep" },
{ "block": "std::gate", "all": [ { "metric": "n_trades", "cmp": "ge", "value": 0.0 } ] }
]
}"#;
/// Property (#210, sweep-dissolution-a): a selection-free `std::sweep` (no
/// metric/select group) anywhere but the LAST stage of its process is
/// refused by `campaign run`'s data-free preflight — the same seam that
/// already refuses `[sweep, monte_carlo, walk_forward]`'s ordering fault
/// above — before any member runs (the [1, 2] 1970-epoch-ms window is never
/// reached), naming the offending stage index, Debug-free. A regression
/// that let a non-terminal selection-free sweep through would silently
/// drop a stage's nominee downstream (nothing to select a winner from,
/// nothing for a following stage to consume).
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_a_non_terminal_selection_free_sweep() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("selfree.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("selfree.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-selfree-seed");
let proc_id =
register_process_doc(dir, "selfree.process.json", SELECTION_FREE_SWEEP_THEN_GATE_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "selfree.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "selfree.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains(
"process stage 0: a sweep without a selection group (metric + select) must be \
the last stage of its process"
),
"the detail names the terminal-only rule: {out}"
);
assert!(!out.contains("SelectionFreeSweepNotTerminal"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// The same process shape, but the selection-free sweep IS the (only, hence
/// terminal) stage: `campaign validate`'s third (executor-preflight) tier
/// accepts it, data-free, exit 0 — the selection-free arm is a legitimate
/// executable shape, not merely a document-tier-only accept. Pairs with the
/// refusal above: together they pin the exact placement boundary (terminal:
/// yes / anywhere else: no) the executor preflight enforces.
const SELECTION_FREE_SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "sweep-only-no-selection",
"pipeline": [ { "block": "std::sweep" } ]
}"#;
#[test]
fn campaign_validate_accepts_a_terminal_selection_free_sweep() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("selfreeonly.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("selfreeonly.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-validate-selfreeonly-seed");
let proc_id =
register_process_doc(dir, "selfreeonly.process.json", SELECTION_FREE_SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(
dir,
"selfreeonly.campaign.json",
&campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""),
);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "validate", "selfreeonly.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "a terminal selection-free sweep validates as executable: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("campaign document valid (executable): pipeline shape and static guards pass"),
"stdout/stderr: {out}"
);
}
/// The v2 boundary, campaign side: a generalize-bearing process is an
/// executable shape, but `std::generalize` needs >= 2 instruments in the
/// campaign — a STATIC preflight fact (the referential gate has run, no data
/// is read), so the single-GER40 fixture campaign refuses with exit 1 before
/// any member runs. This is the ONE home for the single-instrument refusal;
/// the gated real-data e2e does not duplicate it (its campaign is also
/// single-instrument, and this refusal is data-free by construction).
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_single_instrument_generalize() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("gen1.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("gen1.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-gen1-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "gen1.process.json", GENERALIZE_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "gen1.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "gen1.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("std::generalize needs at least 2"),
"the refusal names the block and the minimum: {out}"
);
assert!(out.contains("1 instrument"), "the refusal names the available count: {out}");
assert!(!out.contains("GeneralizeNeedsInstruments"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// An executable generalize-bearing shape whose metric is a pip metric, not
/// an R metric (`total_pips` is a known, registered scalar — `process
/// register` accepts it — but not R-denominated).
const GENERALIZE_NON_R_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "gen-pip-screen",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
{ "block": "std::generalize", "metric": "total_pips" }
]
}"#;
/// The v2 boundary, metric side: `std::generalize`'s metric guard
/// (`check_r_metric`) is a STATIC preflight fact independent of the
/// instrument-arity guard above it in the same match arm — with >= 2
/// campaign instruments (so arity passes) and a pip metric, `campaign run`
/// must still refuse data-free, naming the metric, and never fall through to
/// the instrument-count prose or a Debug-formatted fault. A regression that
/// let the arity check short-circuit past the metric check (or vice versa)
/// would silently accept a pip-denominated `std::generalize`.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_generalize_non_r_metric() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("genpip.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("genpip.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-genpip-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "genpip.process.json", GENERALIZE_NON_R_PROCESS_DOC);
// Two instruments (arity passes), so the metric guard is the one that
// actually fires. The [1, 2] 1970 window never matters: this refusal is
// data-free, before any member runs.
let campaign_doc = format!(
r#"{{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "campaign",
"name": "run-seam-genpip",
"data": {{ "instruments": ["GER40", "EURUSD"], "windows": [ {{ "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 }} ] }},
"strategies": [ {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{bp_id}" }},
"axes": {{ "fast.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [2, 4] }},
"slow.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [8, 16] }} }} }} ],
"process": {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{proc_id}" }} }},
"seed": 7,
"presentation": {{ "persist_taps": [], "emit": [] }}
}}"#
);
write_doc(dir, "genpip.campaign.json", &campaign_doc);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "genpip.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
// #207 (fieldtest 0108 F8): the refusal names the REAL rule (the rankable
// R-expectancy family), never the mislabel "pip metric" — max_r_drawdown is
// R-denominated yet unranked, so "pip metric" was always wrong.
assert!(
out.contains("std::generalize metric \"total_pips\" is not in the rankable R-expectancy family"),
"the refusal names the offending metric and the real rule: {out}"
);
assert!(!out.contains("2 instrument"), "the arity guard must not fire when arity is fine: {out}");
assert!(!out.contains("GeneralizeNonRMetric"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// A v2 process doc with `std::walk_forward` following the annotator
/// `std::monte_carlo` — intrinsically valid (order across population vs.
/// annotator stages is not a document-tier concern), refused only by the
/// executor's v2 preflight shape guard.
const WF_AFTER_MC_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "wf-after-mc",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
{ "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 100, "block_len": 5 },
{ "block": "std::walk_forward", "in_sample_ms": 1209600000, "out_of_sample_ms": 604800000,
"step_ms": 604800000, "mode": "rolling", "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "select": "argmax" }
]
}"#;
/// Property (0108 task 2, mirroring aura-research's characterization pin
/// `validate_process_permits_walk_forward_after_an_annotator`): the
/// intrinsic/executor tier boundary is observable across TWO CLI commands.
/// `process validate` accepts `[sweep, monte_carlo, walk_forward]` (exit 0 —
/// the document tier does not order population vs. annotator stages) while
/// `campaign run`'s v2 preflight refuses the very same document, before any
/// member executes (data-free: the [1, 2] 1970-epoch-ms window is never
/// reached), because `std::walk_forward` cannot follow the annotator
/// `std::monte_carlo`. A regression that let the executor silently accept the
/// intrinsic tier's looser order (or that widened the intrinsic tier to
/// match) would collapse this two-command divergence.
#[test]
fn process_validate_permits_wf_after_mc_but_campaign_run_refuses_it() {
// intrinsic tier: no project needed, and it accepts the doc outright.
let vdir = temp_cwd("wf-after-mc-validate");
write_doc(&vdir, "wfmc.process.json", WF_AFTER_MC_PROCESS_DOC);
let (vout, vcode) = run_code_in(&vdir, &["process", "validate", "wfmc.process.json"]);
assert_eq!(vcode, Some(0), "intrinsic validate must accept sweep->mc->walk_forward: {vout}");
assert!(
vout.contains("process document valid (intrinsic): 3 pipeline blocks"),
"stdout/stderr: {vout}"
);
// executor tier: campaign run's v2 preflight refuses the same shape.
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wfmc.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wfmc.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-wfmc-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "wfmc.process.json", WF_AFTER_MC_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "wfmc.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "wfmc.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("std::walk_forward cannot follow std::monte_carlo"),
"stdout/stderr: {out}"
);
assert!(!out.contains("PipelineShape {"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// Property (#205, fieldtest 0108 F6): `aura campaign validate` runs the
/// executor's data-free static preflight (`aura_campaign::preflight`) as a
/// THIRD tier, so a pure process-shape fault that needs no data is caught at
/// validate time, not only at `campaign run` time — "valid" now means
/// "runnable". Two faces of the one behaviour, both inside a project (the
/// tier needs the store to fetch the referenced process, like the referential
/// tier above it):
/// - an executable pipeline shape gains a third line, `campaign document
/// valid (executable): pipeline shape and static guards pass`, exit 0;
/// - a `[sweep, monte_carlo, walk_forward]` process — intrinsically valid
/// (`process register` accepts it) and referentially valid (its ref
/// resolves) yet not an executable shape — refuses at VALIDATE with the
/// executor fault header `campaign is not executable:` and the
/// `exec_fault_prose` shape detail, exit 1, before any member runs.
///
/// A regression that dropped the third tier would let an executor-unrunnable
/// shape validate clean (exit 0), the F6 friction.
#[test]
fn campaign_validate_runs_the_executor_preflight_as_a_third_tier() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("runnable.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("runnable.campaign.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wfmc.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wfmc.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-validate-3tier-seed");
// Face 1 — the happy path: an executable pipeline shape (a bare
// std::sweep). Intrinsic + referential pass today (exit 0), but the
// executor tier is invisible; after #205 validate gains the third
// "valid (executable)" line while staying exit 0.
let ok_proc = register_process_doc(dir, "runnable.process.json", SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "runnable.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &ok_proc, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (ok_out, ok_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "validate", "runnable.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(ok_code, Some(0), "an executable campaign validates clean: {ok_out}");
assert!(
ok_out.contains("campaign document valid (referential): all references resolve"),
"the referential tier line survives the added third tier: {ok_out}"
);
assert!(
ok_out.contains(
"campaign document valid (executable): pipeline shape and static guards pass"
),
"the new third (executor-preflight) tier line is emitted: {ok_out}"
);
// Face 2 — the refuse path: `[sweep, monte_carlo, walk_forward]` is
// intrinsically valid (register exits 0, asserted in register_process_doc)
// and referentially valid (same seeded blueprint + axes), so validate
// reaches the third tier — which refuses the non-executable shape at
// validate time (data-free: the [1, 2] 1970-epoch-ms window is never
// reached), exit 1, with the executor fault header + the shape prose.
let bad_proc = register_process_doc(dir, "wfmc.process.json", WF_AFTER_MC_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "wfmc.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &bad_proc, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (bad_out, bad_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "validate", "wfmc.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(bad_code, Some(1), "an executor-unrunnable shape refuses at validate: {bad_out}");
assert!(
bad_out.contains("campaign is not executable:"),
"the executor-tier fault header (mirrors 'campaign references do not resolve:'): {bad_out}"
);
assert!(
bad_out.contains("std::walk_forward cannot follow std::monte_carlo"),
"the shape prose names the ordering violation via exec_fault_prose: {bad_out}"
);
assert!(!bad_out.contains("PipelineShape"), "Debug leak: {bad_out}");
}
/// A v2 process doc with a static `std::monte_carlo resamples: 0` defect.
const ZERO_RESAMPLES_MC_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "zero-resamples-mc",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
{ "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 0, "block_len": 5 }
]
}"#;
/// Property (0108 task 2): `std::monte_carlo`'s `resamples > 0` guard is a
/// STATIC executor-preflight refusal, wired end to end from the on-disk
/// document through to CLI stdout, firing before any member runs (data-free:
/// the [1, 2] 1970-epoch-ms window is never reached) and naming the stage
/// index and the offending field. A regression that dropped the static guard
/// (deferring to the engine's runtime all-zero-resamples degenerate instead)
/// would let this refusal disappear or drift to a different message.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_zero_resamples_monte_carlo_before_any_member_runs() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("zeromc.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("zeromc.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-zeromc-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "zeromc.process.json", ZERO_RESAMPLES_MC_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "zeromc.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "zeromc.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("process stage 1: monte_carlo resamples must be > 0"),
"stdout/stderr: {out}"
);
assert!(!out.contains("ZeroBootstrapParam"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// 0109 split (a) — the tap namespace is CLOSED: the 0107 deferral fixture's
/// made-up "r_record" tap now refuses INTRINSICALLY, exit 1, path-addressed
/// and vocabulary-enumerating. The old test drove `campaign run` on a file
/// target, so this pin drives the same path: the refusal fires at the run's
/// parse-valid gate (`parse_valid_campaign` — the same `validate_campaign` +
/// `doc_fault_prose` composition `campaign validate` shares), before
/// registration, before the referential tier, before any member runs — and
/// therefore before the (Task-3-doomed) loud-deferral note, whose absence is
/// pinned here.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_unknown_tap_at_validate() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("badtap.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("badtap.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-badtap-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "badtap.process.json", SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(
dir,
"badtap.campaign.json",
&campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "\"r_record\"", ""),
);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "badtap.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(out.contains("campaign document invalid:"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains(
"presentation.persist_taps[0]: unknown tap \"r_record\" \
(taps: equity | exposure | r_equity | net_r_equity)"
),
"the refusal is path-addressed and enumerates the vocabulary: {out}"
);
assert!(
!out.contains("not yet honored"),
"an invalid document must never reach the deferral note: {out}"
);
assert!(!out.contains("UnknownTap"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}
/// 0109 split (b) — the control: an in-vocabulary tap ("equity") sails
/// through the new intrinsic gate (no UnknownTap prose) and the run proceeds
/// to refuse at the member-data seam, exactly as a tap-less run over the
/// [1, 2] 1970 epoch-ms window does (data-less host: missing geometry;
/// data-ful host: no archive file overlaps) — exit 1 either way, and no
/// trace output (tracing never starts on a run that dies before members;
/// there is no "traces persisted" summary line). NOTE: the 0107
/// loud-deferral eprintln still fires in this task's tree and is
/// deliberately NOT asserted either way here — Task 3 deletes it and
/// tightens this test to pin its absence.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_valid_tap_reaches_the_member_data_seam() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("taps.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("taps.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-taps-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "taps.process.json", SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(
dir,
"taps.campaign.json",
&campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "\"equity\"", ""),
);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "taps.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
!out.contains("unknown tap"),
"\"equity\" is in the closed vocabulary and must pass validate: {out}"
);
assert!(
out.contains("no recorded geometry") || out.contains("no data for instrument"),
"the refusal names the data condition: {out}"
);
assert!(
!out.contains("traces persisted"),
"no trace summary on a run that never reached a member: {out}"
);
assert!(
!out.contains("persist_taps not yet honored"),
"the 0107 deferral line is retired; persist_taps is honored from 0109 on: {out}"
);
assert!(
!out.contains("traces persisted:"),
"a member-data refusal aborts inside execute, before any tracing: {out}"
);
}
/// Gated real-data e2e (the `cli_run.rs` skip idiom): a full
/// sweep -> gate -> walk_forward -> monte_carlo campaign over GER40
/// Sept-2024 where the local archive is present — exit 0, emit-gated
/// family/selection lines, a final line parseable as JSON with top-level
/// `campaign_run` linking a sweep family id, a walk-forward family id, and a
/// pooled-OOS bootstrap on the terminal mc stage, and the
/// `campaign_runs.jsonl` sibling store written. Since 0109 the campaign
/// also requests `persist_taps: ["equity", "r_equity"]`: the record carries
/// `trace_name`, the nominee's taps land under `traces/<name>/<cell_key>/`
/// (the persist re-run equality-asserted against the recorded nominee —
/// C1), and `aura chart <name>/<cell_key>` reads them back through the
/// shipped viewer. Skips with a note elsewhere so `cargo test --workspace`
/// stays green on a data-less machine.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_real_e2e_sweep_gate_walkforward() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wf.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wf.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-e2e-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "wf.process.json", WF_PROCESS_DOC);
// The GER40 Sept-2024 window (inclusive Unix-ms) — the same gated window
// cli_run.rs drives; ~30 days, so the (14d, 7d, 7d) roller tiles it.
write_doc(
dir,
"wf.campaign.json",
&campaign_doc_json(
&bp_id,
&proc_id,
(1725148800000, 1727740799999),
"\"equity\", \"r_equity\"",
"\"family_table\", \"selection_report\"",
),
);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "wf.campaign.json"]);
// Skip on a data-less machine: the member-data refusal, never a panic.
if code == Some(1)
&& (out.contains("no recorded geometry") || out.contains("no data for instrument"))
{
eprintln!("skip: no local GER40 data for the campaign e2e");
return;
}
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
let record_line = out
.lines()
.find(|l| l.starts_with("{\"campaign_run\":"))
.expect("the always-on final campaign_run line");
let v: serde_json::Value =
serde_json::from_str(record_line).expect("campaign_run line parses as JSON");
let cells = v["campaign_run"]["cells"].as_array().expect("cells array");
assert_eq!(cells.len(), 1, "one (strategy, instrument, window) cell: {record_line}");
let stages = cells[0]["stages"].as_array().expect("stages array");
assert_eq!(
stages.len(),
4,
"sweep + gate + walk_forward + monte_carlo realized: {record_line}"
);
assert!(
stages[0]["family_id"].as_str().is_some(),
"sweep stage links a family: {record_line}"
);
assert_eq!(
stages[1]["survivor_ordinals"].as_array().map(|a| a.len()),
Some(4),
"the always-true gate keeps all four members: {record_line}"
);
assert!(
stages[2]["family_id"].as_str().is_some(),
"walk-forward stage links a family: {record_line}"
);
assert_eq!(
stages[3]["block"].as_str(),
Some("std::monte_carlo"),
"the annotator stage is realized last: {record_line}"
);
let pooled = &stages[3]["bootstrap"]["pooled_oos"];
assert!(
pooled.is_object(),
"an mc stage after walk_forward records ONE pooled-OOS bootstrap: {record_line}"
);
assert_eq!(
pooled["n_resamples"].as_u64(),
Some(200),
"the bootstrap carries the doc's resamples verbatim: {record_line}"
);
// Emit-gated lines: per-member family_table lines (4 sweep members plus
// the walk-forward OOS members) and at least one selection_report line.
let member_lines: Vec<&str> = out
.lines()
.filter(|l| l.starts_with("{\"family_id\":"))
.collect();
assert!(
member_lines.len() >= 4,
"family_table member lines emitted: {out}"
);
// Property (sweep-dissolution.md Goal point 5): the campaign member runner
// (the real `CliMemberRunner` path, `campaign_run.rs`'s
// `report.manifest.instrument = Some(cell.instrument.clone())`) stamps every
// emitted member's manifest with the instrument under test — GER40 here. A
// regression that dropped or mis-stamped the instrument on the campaign path
// would slip past the count-only assertion above but fail here.
for line in &member_lines {
let v: serde_json::Value = serde_json::from_str(line).expect("member line parses as JSON");
assert_eq!(
v["report"]["manifest"]["instrument"].as_str(),
Some("GER40"),
"campaign member manifest must be stamped with the instrument: {line}"
);
}
assert!(
out.lines().any(|l| l.starts_with("{\"selection_report\":")),
"selection_report line emitted: {out}"
);
// The registry's new sibling store carries the realization record.
assert!(
runs_dir.join("campaign_runs.jsonl").is_file(),
"campaign_runs.jsonl written beside runs.jsonl"
);
// 0109: the record claims the trace family it persisted under —
// "{campaign8}-{run}" (fresh store => run 0).
let trace_name = v["campaign_run"]["trace_name"]
.as_str()
.expect("persist_taps non-empty => the record carries trace_name");
assert!(
trace_name.len() == 10 && trace_name.ends_with("-0"),
"trace_name is {{campaign8}}-{{run}}: {trace_name}"
);
assert!(
trace_name[..8].chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_hexdigit()),
"trace_name prefix is the campaign id's first 8 hex chars: {trace_name}"
);
// The summary stderr line names the tap x cell arity (2 requested taps,
// one (strategy, instrument, window) cell).
assert!(
out.contains(&format!("aura: traces persisted: {trace_name} (2 tap(s) x 1 cell(s))")),
"the persist summary line: {out}"
);
// The taps land under traces/<name>/<cell_key>/ — the cell key is
// content-derived: strategy8-instrument-w<window_ordinal>.
let cell_key = format!("{}-GER40-w0", &bp_id[..8]);
let cell_dir = runs_dir.join("traces").join(trace_name).join(&cell_key);
assert!(
cell_dir.join("equity.json").is_file(),
"equity tap persisted at {}",
cell_dir.display()
);
assert!(
cell_dir.join("r_equity.json").is_file(),
"r_equity tap persisted at {}",
cell_dir.display()
);
assert!(
!cell_dir.join("exposure.json").exists(),
"unrequested taps are not persisted"
);
// The shipped viewer reads the member back (the cli_run.rs chart
// idiom): exit 0 and an HTML page carrying both persisted tap series.
let (chart_out, chart_code) =
run_code_in(dir, &["chart", &format!("{trace_name}/{cell_key}")]);
assert_eq!(chart_code, Some(0), "aura chart reads the persisted member: {chart_out}");
assert!(
chart_out.contains("\"equity\"") && chart_out.contains("\"r_equity\""),
"the chart page carries the two persisted taps: {chart_out}"
);
}
/// Property: an UNPRODUCIBLE tap requested alongside a producible one degrades
/// gracefully, never a crash or a silently-dropped whole request. `net_r_equity`
/// is in the closed tap vocabulary (`validate_campaign` accepts it) but has no
/// drained channel on the campaign runner's cost-free wrap (`tap_channel`
/// returns `None`); the one-time stderr note names exactly that tap, the
/// summary line's arity counts only what was actually written (1 tap, not 2),
/// and no `net_r_equity.json` file is ever created — only the producible
/// `equity` tap lands on disk. Uses `SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC` (cheapest
/// executable shape) over the same GER40 Sept-2024 window as the gated wf e2e
/// above, so the underlying member run needs real data; skips on a data-less
/// host like its siblings.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_real_e2e_skips_unproducible_tap_gracefully() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mixedtap.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mixedtap.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-mixedtap-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "mixedtap.process.json", SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(
dir,
"mixedtap.campaign.json",
&campaign_doc_json(
&bp_id,
&proc_id,
(1725148800000, 1727740799999),
"\"net_r_equity\", \"equity\"",
"",
),
);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "mixedtap.campaign.json"]);
// Skip on a data-less machine: the member-data refusal, never a panic.
if code == Some(1)
&& (out.contains("no recorded geometry") || out.contains("no data for instrument"))
{
eprintln!("skip: no local GER40 data for the campaign e2e");
return;
}
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
let record_line = out
.lines()
.find(|l| l.starts_with("{\"campaign_run\":"))
.expect("the always-on final campaign_run line");
let v: serde_json::Value =
serde_json::from_str(record_line).expect("campaign_run line parses as JSON");
let trace_name = v["campaign_run"]["trace_name"]
.as_str()
.expect("persist_taps non-empty => the record carries trace_name");
assert!(
out.contains(
"aura: tap \"net_r_equity\" is not produced by this run (needs a cost run); skipped"
),
"the unproducible tap gets a named, one-time note: {out}"
);
assert!(
out.contains(&format!("aura: traces persisted: {trace_name} (1 tap(s) x 1 cell(s))")),
"the summary counts only the producible tap actually written: {out}"
);
let cell_key = format!("{}-GER40-w0", &bp_id[..8]);
let cell_dir = runs_dir.join("traces").join(trace_name).join(&cell_key);
assert!(
cell_dir.join("equity.json").is_file(),
"the producible tap still persists: {}",
cell_dir.display()
);
assert!(
!cell_dir.join("net_r_equity.json").exists(),
"an unproducible tap is never written to disk"
);
}
/// Gated real-data e2e, the OTHER mc bootstrap input shape (#200 d1): with no
/// walk_forward in the pipeline (`sweep -> monte_carlo`), the terminal
/// annotator's dual-input dispatch takes the `PerSurvivor` arm, not
/// `PooledOos` — one bootstrap per surviving sweep member, keyed by the
/// member's ordinal into the sweep family, rather than one pooled bootstrap
/// over walk-forward OOS windows. `campaign_run_real_e2e_sweep_gate_walkforward`
/// above only exercises `PooledOos`; this is the only e2e coverage of
/// `PerSurvivor` with real data (the addressing-mode tests use it only as a
/// data-free refusal fixture).
#[test]
fn campaign_run_real_e2e_sweep_monte_carlo_per_survivor() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mc.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mc.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-mc-persurvivor-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "mc.process.json", MC_PROCESS_DOC);
// Same GER40 Sept-2024 window as the gated wf e2e above.
write_doc(
dir,
"mc.campaign.json",
&campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1725148800000, 1727740799999), "", ""),
);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "mc.campaign.json"]);
// Skip on a data-less machine: the member-data refusal, never a panic.
if code == Some(1)
&& (out.contains("no recorded geometry") || out.contains("no data for instrument"))
{
eprintln!("skip: no local GER40 data for the campaign e2e");
return;
}
assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
let record_line = out
.lines()
.find(|l| l.starts_with("{\"campaign_run\":"))
.expect("the always-on final campaign_run line");
let v: serde_json::Value =
serde_json::from_str(record_line).expect("campaign_run line parses as JSON");
let cells = v["campaign_run"]["cells"].as_array().expect("cells array");
let stages = cells[0]["stages"].as_array().expect("stages array");
assert_eq!(stages.len(), 2, "sweep + monte_carlo realized: {record_line}");
assert_eq!(
stages[1]["block"].as_str(),
Some("std::monte_carlo"),
"the annotator stage is realized last: {record_line}"
);
let per_survivor = stages[1]["bootstrap"]["per_survivor"]
.as_array()
.expect("no walk_forward precedes: the PerSurvivor arm, not pooled_oos");
assert_eq!(
per_survivor.len(),
4,
"one bootstrap per surviving sweep member (4 axis combinations, no gate): {record_line}"
);
let (ordinal, bootstrap) = (per_survivor[0][0].as_u64(), &per_survivor[0][1]);
assert_eq!(ordinal, Some(0), "each entry is keyed by ordinal into the sweep family: {record_line}");
assert_eq!(
bootstrap["n_resamples"].as_u64(),
Some(100),
"the bootstrap carries the doc's resamples verbatim: {record_line}"
);
}
/// `run_campaign` resolves a target two ways — a readable file (register-then-
/// run sugar) or a bare content id (direct store address) — then funnels BOTH
/// through one shared post-resolution path: "fetch the stored canonical bytes
/// by id ... so file addressing and id addressing produce the same
/// realization by construction" (the driver's own doc comment). This pins
/// that property observably: registering a document and then running it once
/// by FILE and once by its own resulting content ID must refuse with the
/// byte-identical prose — proof the two addressing modes are not two
/// independently drifting code paths. No real data needed: with the [1, 2]
/// 1970 window, both runs pass the (now mc-permitting) preflight and refuse
/// at the member-data seam — no recorded geometry on a data-less host, no
/// overlapping archive window on a data-ful one — exit 1 and byte-identical
/// prose either way (the message depends only on env/instrument/window).
#[test]
fn campaign_run_by_content_id_matches_file_sugar_refusal() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mc2.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mc2.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-id-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "mc2.process.json", MC_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "mc2.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (file_out, file_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "mc2.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(file_code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {file_out}");
let (reg_out, reg_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "register", "mc2.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(reg_code, Some(0), "register failed: {reg_out}");
let id = reg_out
.lines()
.find(|l| l.starts_with("registered campaign "))
.expect("register line")
.trim_start_matches("registered campaign ")
.split(' ')
.next()
.expect("id")
.trim_start_matches("content:")
.to_string();
let (id_out, id_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", &id]);
assert_eq!(id_code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {id_out}");
let file_line = file_out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("aura: ")).expect("file refusal line");
let id_line = id_out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("aura: ")).expect("id refusal line");
assert!(
file_line.contains("no recorded geometry") || file_line.contains("no data for instrument"),
"the refusal is the member-data seam (mc processes execute now): {file_line}"
);
assert_eq!(file_line, id_line, "file- and id-addressed runs must refuse identically");
}
/// #194 (the prefix trap): a `campaign run` target may carry the display
/// `content:` prefix copied verbatim from the tool's own register/introspect
/// output — the CLI strips it and resolves the bare store address. Pinned
/// observably: running the SAME registered campaign by bare id and by its
/// `content:`-prefixed form must refuse identically (proof the prefix is
/// stripped, not read as a second, unresolvable address). Both refuse at the
/// member-data seam (the mc process is executable in v2; the [1, 2] 1970
/// window guarantees a deterministic data refusal), so no real data is
/// needed.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_tolerates_content_prefix_on_target() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("prefix.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("prefix.campaign.json")),
]);
let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-prefix-seed");
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "prefix.process.json", MC_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "prefix.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (reg_out, reg_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "register", "prefix.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(reg_code, Some(0), "register failed: {reg_out}");
let id = reg_out
.lines()
.find(|l| l.starts_with("registered campaign "))
.expect("register line")
.trim_start_matches("registered campaign ")
.split(' ')
.next()
.expect("id")
.trim_start_matches("content:")
.to_string();
let (bare_out, _) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", &id]);
let (pfx_out, _) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", &format!("content:{id}")]);
let pfx_line = pfx_out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("aura: ")).expect("prefixed refusal line");
assert!(
!pfx_line.contains("neither a readable .json file nor a 64-hex content id"),
"a content:-prefixed target must resolve as the bare id, not refuse as an unknown target: {pfx_line}"
);
let bare_line = bare_out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("aura: ")).expect("bare refusal line");
assert!(
bare_line.contains("no recorded geometry") || bare_line.contains("no data for instrument"),
"the refusal is the member-data seam (mc processes execute now): {bare_line}"
);
assert_eq!(bare_line, pfx_line, "bare-id and content:-prefixed runs must resolve identically");
}
/// Property (#196 on-ramp x #198 executor): a blueprint registered through
/// `aura graph register` — NOT the pre-#196 `aura sweep` side-effect
/// `seed_blueprint` relies on elsewhere in this file — is a fully valid
/// campaign strategy ref: its content id resolves through the referential
/// gate, and its raw param space (`fast.length`/`slow.length`, the same
/// names `graph introspect --params` reports for this fixture) binds against
/// the campaign document's axes in `bind_axes`. This closes fieldtest F5
/// ("strategy refs unresolvable from the public surface — no blueprint
/// register verb") end to end: the run reaches the member-data seam (the
/// same [1, 2] 1970 window used elsewhere in this file for a deterministic,
/// data-free refusal) rather than failing earlier at referencing or binding.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_accepts_a_graph_register_seeded_strategy() {
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("onramp.process.json")),
ScratchPath::File(dir.join("onramp.campaign.json")),
]);
let open_bp = format!("{}/tests/fixtures/sma_signal_open.json", env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR"));
let (reg_out, reg_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["graph", "register", &open_bp]);
assert_eq!(reg_code, Some(0), "graph register failed: {reg_out}");
let bp_id = reg_out
.lines()
.find(|l| l.starts_with("registered blueprint "))
.expect("register line")
.trim_start_matches("registered blueprint ")
.split(' ')
.next()
.expect("id")
.trim_start_matches("content:")
.to_string();
let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "onramp.process.json", SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC);
write_doc(dir, "onramp.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "onramp.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("no recorded geometry") || out.contains("no data for instrument"),
"referencing + axis-binding must succeed, reaching the member-data \
seam rather than a referential or bind refusal: {out}"
);
}
/// `campaign run`'s file-sugar branch calls `parse_valid_campaign` directly
/// (unwrapped), the SAME intrinsic validator `campaign register` calls but
/// wraps in its own "refusing to register:" prefix. This pins that `run`
/// does NOT inherit register's wrapper — an intrinsically invalid document
/// refuses with the bare "campaign document invalid:" prose — and, like
/// register, never touches the store for it. No project scaffolding, no
/// data, no seeded blueprint needed: the refusal fires before any of that is
/// read.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_invalid_file_refuses_before_touching_store() {
// Run inside the built project (campaign run needs one, per the project
// gate); the document fails intrinsic validation before any store or
// referential check is reached, so the project's own store is untouched.
let _fixture = project_lock();
let dir = built_project();
let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
let bad = CAMPAIGN_DOC.replacen(r#""values": [8]"#, r#""values": []"#, 1);
let bad_path = write_doc(dir, "bad.campaign.json", &bad);
let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()), ScratchPath::File(bad_path)]);
let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "bad.campaign.json"]);
assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
assert!(
out.contains("aura: campaign document invalid:"),
"run must surface the bare doc-tier prose, not register's wrapper: {out}"
);
assert!(
out.contains("axes.fast: an axis is a non-empty finite set"),
"the doc-tier fault names the offending axis: {out}"
);
assert!(!out.contains("refusing to register:"), "run must not reuse register's prefix: {out}");
assert!(
!dir.join("runs").join("campaigns").exists(),
"an invalid document must not create a store entry"
);
}