Aura/crates/aura-cli/tests/research_docs.rs

//! End-to-end coverage for the `aura process` verb family (#188/#189): drives
//! the built `aura` binary over argv/file, the exact surface a data-level
//! author uses.

use std::path::{Path, PathBuf};
use std::sync::{Mutex, MutexGuard, OnceLock};

/// A fresh, unique working directory for a process test that persists
/// content-addressed documents under `./runs/` (so `aura process register`
/// never dirties the repo). Unique per test + per process; no external
/// tempfile dependency (mirrors `cli_run.rs` / `cli_broken_pipe.rs`).
fn temp_cwd(name: &str) -> PathBuf {
    let dir = std::env::temp_dir().join(format!("aura-cli-{}-{}", std::process::id(), name));
    let _ = std::fs::remove_dir_all(&dir);
    std::fs::create_dir_all(&dir).expect("create temp cwd");
    dir
}

fn run_code_in(dir: &Path, args: &[&str]) -> (String, Option<i32>) {
    let out = std::process::Command::new(env!("CARGO_BIN_EXE_aura"))
        .args(args)
        .current_dir(dir)
        .output()
        .expect("binary runs");
    let text = format!(
        "{}{}",
        String::from_utf8_lossy(&out.stdout),
        String::from_utf8_lossy(&out.stderr)
    );
    (text, out.status.code())
}

fn run_code(args: &[&str]) -> (String, Option<i32>) {
    run_code_in(Path::new("."), args)
}

const PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "process",
  "name": "wf-deflated-screen",
  "pipeline": [
    { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "select": "plateau:worst", "deflate": true },
    { "block": "std::gate", "all": [
        { "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "cmp": "gt", "value": 0.0 },
        { "metric": "overfit_probability", "cmp": "lt", "value": 0.1 } ] },
    { "block": "std::walk_forward", "in_sample_ms": 4000, "out_of_sample_ms": 1000,
      "step_ms": 1000, "mode": "rolling", "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "select": "argmax" }
  ]
}"#;

fn write_doc(dir: &Path, name: &str, text: &str) -> PathBuf {
    let p = dir.join(name);
    std::fs::write(&p, text).expect("write doc");
    p
}

#[test]
fn process_validate_reports_intrinsic_ok() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-ok");
    write_doc(&dir, "p.process.json", PROCESS_DOC);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "p.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("process document valid (intrinsic): 3 pipeline blocks, 2 gate predicates"));
}

#[test]
fn process_validate_refuses_unknown_metric_as_prose_exit_1() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-bad-metric");
    let bad = PROCESS_DOC.replacen(
        "net_expectancy_r\", \"select\": \"plateau:worst",
        "netto_r\", \"select\": \"plateau:worst",
        1,
    );
    write_doc(&dir, "bad.process.json", &bad);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "bad.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1));
    assert!(out.contains("unknown metric \"netto_r\""));
    assert!(!out.contains("UnknownMetric"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}

#[test]
fn process_validate_refuses_zero_walk_forward_length_as_prose_exit_1() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-zero-wf");
    let bad = PROCESS_DOC.replacen("\"step_ms\": 1000", "\"step_ms\": 0", 1);
    write_doc(&dir, "bad.process.json", &bad);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "bad.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("pipeline[2]: walk_forward step_ms must be > 0"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(!out.contains("ZeroWalkForwardLength"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}

/// A document authored against the vocabulary `std::walk_forward` carried
/// before cycle 0107 (`folds`/`in_sample_bars`/`out_of_sample_bars`, none of
/// which the engine's `WindowRoller` accepts) is refused end-to-end through
/// the CLI's malformed-document path (a parse failure, distinct from the
/// validate-fault path exercised above) with prose naming the offending
/// slot — never a Debug-formatted `DocError`, never a silent accept of the
/// retired shape.
#[test]
fn process_validate_refuses_retired_walk_forward_vocabulary_as_prose_exit_1() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-retired-wf-vocab");
    let bad = PROCESS_DOC.replacen(
        "{ \"block\": \"std::walk_forward\", \"in_sample_ms\": 4000, \"out_of_sample_ms\": 1000,\n      \"step_ms\": 1000, \"mode\": \"rolling\", \"metric\": \"net_expectancy_r\", \"select\": \"argmax\" }",
        "{ \"block\": \"std::walk_forward\", \"folds\": 4, \"in_sample_bars\": 4000, \"out_of_sample_bars\": 1000, \"metric\": \"net_expectancy_r\", \"select\": \"argmax\" }",
        1,
    );
    assert_ne!(bad, PROCESS_DOC, "replacen must actually match the fixture's walk_forward stage");
    write_doc(&dir, "bad.process.json", &bad);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "bad.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("unknown slot \"folds\""), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(!out.contains("Malformed"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}

/// The roller's second `RollMode` — `anchored` (growing, origin-fixed
/// in-sample) — round-trips through the CLI's actual validate path, not
/// just the `slot_kind_label` description string: a data author who writes
/// `"mode": "anchored"` gets a valid document, exercising the `WfMode`
/// serde oracle's non-default variant end to end.
#[test]
fn process_validate_accepts_anchored_walk_forward_mode() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("process-validate-anchored-wf-mode");
    let anchored = PROCESS_DOC.replacen("\"mode\": \"rolling\"", "\"mode\": \"anchored\"", 1);
    assert_ne!(anchored, PROCESS_DOC, "replacen must actually match the fixture's mode field");
    write_doc(&dir, "anchored.process.json", &anchored);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "validate", "anchored.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("process document valid (intrinsic): 3 pipeline blocks, 2 gate predicates"));
}

#[test]
fn process_introspect_vocabulary_block_and_content_id() {
    let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--vocabulary"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
    for id in ["std::sweep", "std::gate", "std::walk_forward", "std::monte_carlo", "std::generalize"] {
        assert!(out.contains(id), "vocabulary misses {id}: {out}");
    }
    let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--block", "std::sweep"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
    assert!(out.contains("metric"));
    assert!(out.contains("required"));

    let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--block", "std::walk_forward"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
    for slot in ["in_sample_ms", "out_of_sample_ms", "step_ms", "mode"] {
        assert!(out.contains(slot), "walk_forward describe misses {slot}: {out}");
    }
    assert!(out.contains("one of: rolling | anchored"), "mode label missing: {out}");
    assert!(!out.contains("folds"), "retired slot still advertised: {out}");

    let dir = temp_cwd("process-introspect-content-id");
    write_doc(&dir, "p.process.json", PROCESS_DOC);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "introspect", "--content-id", "p.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    // #194: --content-id prints the bare 64-hex id (matching `graph introspect
    // --content-id` and the store filename), no glued `content:` display prefix.
    let line = out.lines().last().expect("id line").trim();
    assert_eq!(line.len(), 64, "bare 64-hex id, no content: prefix: {out}");
    assert!(line.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_hexdigit()), "bare hex id: {out}");
    assert!(!out.contains("content:"), "--content-id must not glue the content: prefix: {out}");
}

#[test]
fn process_introspect_unknown_block_is_prose_exit_1() {
    let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--block", "std::nope"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("unknown block \"std::nope\""), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
}

#[test]
fn process_introspect_unwired_lists_open_slots() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("process-introspect-unwired");
    let partial = r#"{ "format_version": 1, "kind": "process",
        "pipeline": [ { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn" } ] }"#;
    write_doc(&dir, "partial.process.json", partial);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "introspect", "--unwired", "partial.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
    assert!(out.contains("open slot: name"));
    assert!(out.contains("open slot: pipeline[0].select"));
}

#[test]
fn process_introspect_no_flag_is_usage_exit_2() {
    let (_out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(2));
}

/// #197 (fieldtest 0107 F9): the metric roster is enumerable from the public
/// surface. `aura process introspect --metrics` lists every name in
/// `aura_research::metric_vocabulary()` (17), each annotated with where it is
/// applicable — `rankable` (a sweep/walk_forward `select` metric, from
/// `aura_campaign::RANKABLE_METRICS`), `gate` (a gate-predicate per-member
/// scalar, from `aura_campaign::PER_MEMBER_METRICS`), or `annotation` (in
/// neither roster — a selection annotation that can neither rank nor gate). The
/// split the executor enforces at preflight (a metric may exist yet not be
/// rankable, F9) is thereby readable before any trial run. Substrings are
/// pinned, not exact column widths.
#[test]
fn process_introspect_metrics_lists_vocabulary_with_applicability() {
    let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--metrics"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");

    // One line per vocabulary name, nothing else — the whole 17-name roster.
    let lines: Vec<&str> = out.lines().filter(|l| !l.trim().is_empty()).collect();
    assert_eq!(lines.len(), 17, "one line per metric_vocabulary() name: {out}");

    // Locate a metric's line by its exact name column (first whitespace token),
    // so `expectancy_r` never matches `net_expectancy_r`'s line.
    let line_for = |name: &str| -> String {
        out.lines()
            .find(|l| l.split_whitespace().next() == Some(name))
            .unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("no line for {name}: {out}"))
            .to_string()
    };

    // expectancy_r is BOTH rankable and a per-member gate scalar.
    let er = line_for("expectancy_r");
    assert!(er.contains("rankable") && er.contains("gate"), "expectancy_r tags: {er}");

    // total_pips likewise (a rankable scalar that is also per-member).
    let tp = line_for("total_pips");
    assert!(tp.contains("rankable") && tp.contains("gate"), "total_pips tags: {tp}");

    // win_rate is per-member (gate) but NOT rankable.
    let wr = line_for("win_rate");
    assert!(wr.contains("gate") && !wr.contains("rankable"), "win_rate tags: {wr}");

    // deflated_score is a selection annotation — in neither roster.
    let ds = line_for("deflated_score");
    assert!(ds.contains("annotation"), "deflated_score tag: {ds}");
}

/// `--metrics` joins the existing one-mode guard: exactly one introspect mode
/// is allowed, so `--metrics` alongside another mode refuses with the usage
/// line (exit 2), and that usage line is extended to advertise `--metrics` as
/// one of the modes. (The guard's own `Usage: aura process introspect
/// --vocabulary …` line is asserted — never clap's unknown-arg error, which
/// spells the flag list as `[OPTIONS]`.)
#[test]
fn process_introspect_metrics_plus_another_mode_is_usage_exit_2() {
    let (out, code) = run_code(&["process", "introspect", "--metrics", "--vocabulary"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(2), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("Usage: aura process introspect --vocabulary"),
        "the one-mode guard usage line must fire: {out}"
    );
    assert!(out.contains("--metrics"), "the usage line must advertise --metrics: {out}");
}

#[test]
fn process_register_stores_content_addressed_under_runs_root() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("process-register");
    write_doc(&dir, "p.process.json", PROCESS_DOC);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["process", "register", "p.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    // #194: the register verb prints the bare id — `registered process <id> (<path>)`.
    let line = out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("registered process ")).expect("line");
    assert!(!line.contains("content:"), "register line prints the bare id, no content: prefix: {line}");
    let id = line
        .trim_start_matches("registered process ")
        .split(' ')
        .next()
        .expect("id");
    assert!(dir.join("runs").join("processes").join(format!("{id}.json")).is_file());
}

/// The demo-project fixture (Aura.toml present), built once — mirrors
/// `project_load.rs`'s `built_fixture` (a separate test binary, so it needs
/// its own `OnceLock`, but `cargo build` is idempotent).
fn built_project() -> &'static PathBuf {
    static BUILT: OnceLock<PathBuf> = OnceLock::new();
    BUILT.get_or_init(|| {
        let dir = Path::new(env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR")).join("tests/fixtures/demo-project");
        let out = std::process::Command::new("cargo")
            .arg("build")
            .current_dir(&dir)
            .output()
            .expect("spawn cargo build for the fixture project");
        assert!(
            out.status.success(),
            "fixture build failed:\n{}",
            String::from_utf8_lossy(&out.stderr)
        );
        dir
    })
}

/// Serializes every test that touches the shared demo-project fixture store
/// (they remove/re-seed `<fixture>/runs`, so parallel test threads would race
/// on it). A poisoned lock is taken over: one failed test must not cascade
/// into unrelated lock panics.
fn project_lock() -> MutexGuard<'static, ()> {
    static LOCK: Mutex<()> = Mutex::new(());
    LOCK.lock().unwrap_or_else(|e| e.into_inner())
}

/// A scratch filesystem entry this test writes under the git-tracked
/// demo-project fixture root (only `runs/` there is fixture-gitignored),
/// removed on drop — including during a mid-test panic — so a failed
/// assertion never leaks scratch docs into tracked working-tree state.
enum ScratchPath {
    File(PathBuf),
    Dir(PathBuf),
}

struct ScratchGuard(Vec<ScratchPath>);

impl Drop for ScratchGuard {
    fn drop(&mut self) {
        for p in &self.0 {
            match p {
                ScratchPath::File(p) => {
                    let _ = std::fs::remove_file(p);
                }
                ScratchPath::Dir(p) => {
                    let _ = std::fs::remove_dir_all(p);
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

/// The `aura campaign validate` referential tier (the campaign family's
/// headline addition over the intrinsic-only process family), exercised at
/// the CLI seam inside a real project: a fully-resolved document prints the
/// "valid (referential)" success line, and an unresolved reference prints
/// the "do not resolve" fault block through `ref_fault_prose`. The
/// constituents (`validate_campaign_refs`, `ref_fault_prose`) are unit-
/// tested elsewhere; this pins that `aura campaign validate` actually wires
/// them together end to end.
#[test]
fn campaign_validate_in_project_reports_referential_tier_end_to_end() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("seed.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("ref-ok.campaign.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("ref-bad.campaign.json")),
    ]);

    // Seed one real, content-addressed, open-param blueprint into the
    // project's own store via a real sweep (mirrors `project_load.rs`'s
    // anchor test).
    let open_bp = format!("{}/tests/fixtures/sma_signal_open.json", env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR"));
    let (sweep_out, sweep_code) = run_code_in(
        dir,
        &[
            "sweep",
            &open_bp,
            "--axis",
            "sma_signal.fast.length=2,4",
            "--axis",
            "sma_signal.slow.length=8,16",
            "--name",
            "campaign-ref-seed",
        ],
    );
    assert_eq!(sweep_code, Some(0), "seed sweep failed: {sweep_out}");
    let bp_id = std::fs::read_dir(runs_dir.join("blueprints"))
        .expect("blueprints dir")
        .next()
        .expect("one stored blueprint")
        .expect("dir entry")
        .path()
        .file_stem()
        .expect("stem")
        .to_string_lossy()
        .into_owned();

    // Register a valid AND executable process into the same project store:
    // this test's OK campaign must pass all three validate tiers, and
    // PROCESS_DOC's sweep (deflate: true + plateau:worst) is intrinsically
    // valid but statically refused by the executor preflight (#205's third
    // tier) — so the referential fixture gets an argmax/no-deflate twin.
    let exec_process = PROCESS_DOC
        .replacen(
            "\"select\": \"plateau:worst\", \"deflate\": true",
            "\"select\": \"argmax\", \"deflate\": false",
            1,
        )
        // ... and its gate predicates over the annotation metric
        // overfit_probability (not per-member) flip to a per-member scalar.
        .replacen("\"overfit_probability\", \"cmp\": \"lt\", \"value\": 0.1", "\"win_rate\", \"cmp\": \"lt\", \"value\": 1.1", 1);
    assert_ne!(exec_process, PROCESS_DOC, "replacen must match the sweep stage");
    write_doc(dir, "seed.process.json", &exec_process);
    let (proc_out, proc_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["process", "register", "seed.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(proc_code, Some(0), "seed process register failed: {proc_out}");
    let proc_id = proc_out
        .lines()
        .find(|l| l.starts_with("registered process "))
        .expect("register line")
        .trim_start_matches("registered process ")
        .split(' ')
        .next()
        .expect("id")
        .trim_start_matches("content:")
        .to_string();

    // "fast.length": the axis name is the RAW composite's `param_space` name.
    // `validate_campaign_refs` loads the stored blueprint bare, unlike the
    // sweep's `wrap_r`-wrapped axis probe, so it does NOT carry the
    // "sma_signal." prefix `aura sweep --axis` binds against.
    let campaign = format!(
        r#"{{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "campaign",
  "name": "ref-check",
  "data": {{ "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ {{ "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 }} ] }},
  "strategies": [ {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{bp}" }},
                    "axes": {{ "fast.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [2] }},
                              "slow.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [6] }} }} }} ],
  "process": {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{proc}" }} }},
  "seed": 1,
  "presentation": {{ "persist_taps": [], "emit": ["family_table"] }}
}}"#,
        bp = bp_id,
        proc = proc_id
    );
    write_doc(dir, "ref-ok.campaign.json", &campaign);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "validate", "ref-ok.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains(
        "campaign document valid (referential): all references resolve, axes are in the param space"
    ));

    // An unresolved process reference: the fault block + `ref_fault_prose`
    // mapping, prose exit 1, at the same CLI seam.
    let bad = campaign.replace(&proc_id, "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000");
    write_doc(dir, "ref-bad.campaign.json", &bad);
    let (out2, code2) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "validate", "ref-bad.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code2, Some(1));
    assert!(out2.contains("campaign references do not resolve:"), "stdout/stderr: {out2}");
    assert!(out2.contains("not found in the project store"), "stdout/stderr: {out2}");

    // `_cleanup` (a `ScratchGuard`) removes the scratch docs and `runs/` on
    // drop, at the end of this scope — including on a mid-test panic.
}

const CAMPAIGN_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "campaign",
  "name": "screen",
  "data": { "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ { "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 } ] },
  "strategies": [ { "ref": { "content_id": "9f3a" },
                    "axes": { "fast": { "kind": "I64", "values": [8] } } } ],
  "process": { "ref": { "content_id": "4e2d" } },
  "seed": 1,
  "presentation": { "persist_taps": [], "emit": ["family_table"] }
}"#;

#[test]
fn campaign_validate_outside_project_skips_referential_tier() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-validate-outside-project");
    write_doc(&dir, "c.campaign.json", CAMPAIGN_DOC);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "validate", "c.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("campaign document valid (intrinsic):"));
    assert!(out.contains("referential checks skipped (no Aura.toml found up from "));
}

#[test]
fn campaign_validate_refuses_empty_axis_prose_exit_1() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-validate-empty-axis");
    let bad = CAMPAIGN_DOC.replacen(r#""values": [8]"#, r#""values": []"#, 1);
    write_doc(&dir, "bad.campaign.json", &bad);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "validate", "bad.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1));
    assert!(out.contains("axes.fast: an axis is a non-empty finite set"));
    assert!(!out.contains("EmptyAxis"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}

#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_vocabulary_lists_sections() {
    let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect", "--vocabulary"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
    for id in ["std::data", "std::strategy", "std::process_ref", "std::presentation"] {
        assert!(out.contains(id), "vocabulary misses {id}: {out}");
    }
}

#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_unwired_reports_the_spec_example_slots() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-introspect-unwired");
    let draft = r#"{ "format_version": 1, "kind": "campaign", "name": "draft",
        "data": { "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ { "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 } ] },
        "strategies": [ { "ref": { "content_id": "9f3a" },
                          "axes": { "slow": { "kind": "I64", "values": [] } } } ],
        "seed": 1,
        "presentation": { "persist_taps": [], "emit": [] } }"#;
    write_doc(&dir, "draft.campaign.json", draft);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "introspect", "--unwired", "draft.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0));
    assert!(out.contains("open slot: process.ref (required, content id of a process document)"));
    assert!(out.contains("open slot: strategies[0].axes.slow (axis declared empty — a P1 axis is a non-empty finite set)"));
}

/// #195 (fieldtest 0106 F4): the consumer view of the placeholder-ref probe.
/// A draft that spells its open refs as `"ref": {}` / `"ref": null` — the
/// natural drafting placeholders — has `--unwired` enumerate BOTH as open slots
/// (exit 0), instead of the old cryptic serde refusal / silent "no open slots".
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_unwired_reports_placeholder_refs() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-introspect-unwired-placeholder");
    let draft = r#"{ "format_version": 1, "kind": "campaign", "name": "draft",
        "data": { "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ { "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 } ] },
        "strategies": [ { "ref": null,
                          "axes": { "slow": { "kind": "I64", "values": [10, 20] } } } ],
        "process": { "ref": {} },
        "seed": 1,
        "presentation": { "persist_taps": [], "emit": [] } }"#;
    write_doc(&dir, "draft.campaign.json", draft);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "introspect", "--unwired", "draft.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("open slot: strategies[0].ref (required, one of: content_id, identity_id)"),
        "strategy `ref: null` placeholder not enumerated: {out}"
    );
    assert!(
        out.contains("open slot: process.ref (required, content id of a process document)"),
        "process `ref: {{}}` placeholder not enumerated: {out}"
    );
}

/// The campaign twin of `process_introspect_vocabulary_block_and_content_id`'s
/// `--content-id` branch: pins that `campaign introspect --content-id` wires
/// `parse_valid_campaign` + `campaign_to_json` + `content_id_of` end to end
/// (the process branch was covered; this one was not).
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_content_id_prints_hash() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-introspect-content-id");
    write_doc(&dir, "c.campaign.json", CAMPAIGN_DOC);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "introspect", "--content-id", "c.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    // #194: --content-id prints the bare 64-hex id, no glued `content:` prefix.
    let line = out.lines().last().expect("id line").trim();
    assert_eq!(line.len(), 64, "bare 64-hex id, no content: prefix: {out}");
    assert!(line.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_hexdigit()), "bare hex id: {out}");
    assert!(!out.contains("content:"), "--content-id must not glue the content: prefix: {out}");
}

#[test]
fn campaign_register_stores_content_addressed_under_runs_root() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-register");
    write_doc(&dir, "c.campaign.json", CAMPAIGN_DOC);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "register", "c.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    // #194: the register verb prints the bare id — `registered campaign <id> (<path>)`.
    let line = out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("registered campaign ")).expect("line");
    assert!(!line.contains("content:"), "register line prints the bare id, no content: prefix: {line}");
    let id = line
        .trim_start_matches("registered campaign ")
        .split(' ')
        .next()
        .expect("id");
    assert!(dir.join("runs").join("campaigns").join(format!("{id}.json")).is_file());
}

/// `guard_one_mode` is shared, family-parameterized code (`process` and
/// `campaign` both route through it). The process family already pins the
/// zero-flags arm; this pins that the campaign family gets its own family
/// name threaded into the usage line, not a copy-pasted "process" string.
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_no_flag_usage_names_the_campaign_family() {
    let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(2), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("Usage: aura campaign introspect --vocabulary | --block <ID> | --unwired <FILE> | --content-id <FILE>"),
        "stdout/stderr: {out}"
    );
}

/// `guard_one_mode` requires *exactly* one mode: the zero-flags arm is
/// pinned elsewhere, but nothing previously exercised the over-selection
/// arm (`selected_modes() != 1` is not just `== 0`). Two modes at once must
/// refuse with the same usage-exit-2 idiom, not silently pick one.
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_two_flags_is_usage_exit_2() {
    let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect", "--vocabulary", "--block", "std::data"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(2), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("Usage: aura campaign introspect"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
}

/// #197: the metrics roster is process-side R-vocabulary, but `--metrics` rides
/// the shared `DocIntrospectCmd` both families route through, so `aura campaign
/// introspect --metrics` WORKS too rather than usage-refusing. Ground for the
/// pin: a mode the shared struct carries needs no per-family exclusion, and the
/// vocabulary a campaign's referenced process must name is thus discoverable
/// from the campaign verb as well (simplest honest reading). Same annotated
/// roster as the process family.
#[test]
fn campaign_introspect_metrics_also_lists_the_vocabulary() {
    let (out, code) = run_code(&["campaign", "introspect", "--metrics"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    let er = out
        .lines()
        .find(|l| l.split_whitespace().next() == Some("expectancy_r"))
        .unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("no expectancy_r line: {out}"));
    assert!(er.contains("rankable") && er.contains("gate"), "expectancy_r tags: {er}");
    assert!(
        out.lines()
            .any(|l| l.split_whitespace().next() == Some("deflated_score") && l.contains("annotation")),
        "the annotation roster is reachable from the campaign family too: {out}"
    );
}

/// Register must be a gate, not a passthrough: an invalid document is
/// refused with prose (exit 1) and — the property that matters for a
/// content-addressed store — no file is ever written under `runs/campaigns/`
/// for it. A store that could contain unvalidated documents would make
/// every downstream reader re-derive the checks register was supposed to
/// have already made.
#[test]
fn campaign_register_refuses_invalid_document_and_writes_nothing() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-register-invalid");
    let bad = CAMPAIGN_DOC.replacen(r#""values": [8]"#, r#""values": []"#, 1);
    write_doc(&dir, "bad.campaign.json", &bad);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "register", "bad.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("refusing to register:"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("axes.fast: an axis is a non-empty finite set"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        !dir.join("runs").join("campaigns").exists(),
        "register must not create a store entry for an invalid document"
    );
}

/// Seed one open-param blueprint into the built demo project's store via a
/// real sweep and return its content id (the referential test's recipe).
fn seed_blueprint(dir: &Path, name: &str) -> String {
    let open_bp = format!("{}/tests/fixtures/sma_signal_open.json", env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR"));
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(
        dir,
        &[
            "sweep",
            &open_bp,
            "--axis",
            "sma_signal.fast.length=2,4",
            "--axis",
            "sma_signal.slow.length=8,16",
            "--name",
            name,
        ],
    );
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "seed sweep failed: {out}");
    std::fs::read_dir(dir.join("runs").join("blueprints"))
        .expect("blueprints dir")
        .next()
        .expect("one stored blueprint")
        .expect("dir entry")
        .path()
        .file_stem()
        .expect("stem")
        .to_string_lossy()
        .into_owned()
}

/// Register `doc` as a process document in the project store; returns its id.
/// Asserts register exits 0 — an intrinsically valid document (annotator
/// stages in any order included) must always register; only `campaign run`'s
/// preflight draws the executable-shape line.
fn register_process_doc(dir: &Path, file: &str, doc: &str) -> String {
    write_doc(dir, file, doc);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["process", "register", file]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "process register failed: {out}");
    out.lines()
        .find(|l| l.starts_with("registered process "))
        .expect("register line")
        .trim_start_matches("registered process ")
        .split(' ')
        .next()
        .expect("id")
        .trim_start_matches("content:")
        .to_string()
}

/// A referentially-resolving campaign over the seeded blueprint. Axes name
/// the RAW `param_space` names (`fast.length` / `slow.length` — see the
/// naming note in the referential test above). `persist_taps`/`emit` are
/// spliced verbatim (pass `""` for empty, `"\"family_table\""` etc.).
fn campaign_doc_json(
    bp_id: &str,
    proc_id: &str,
    window: (i64, i64),
    persist_taps: &str,
    emit: &str,
) -> String {
    format!(
        r#"{{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "campaign",
  "name": "run-seam",
  "data": {{ "instruments": ["GER40"], "windows": [ {{ "from_ms": {from}, "to_ms": {to} }} ] }},
  "strategies": [ {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{bp_id}" }},
                    "axes": {{ "fast.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [2, 4] }},
                              "slow.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [8, 16] }} }} }} ],
  "process": {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{proc_id}" }} }},
  "seed": 7,
  "presentation": {{ "persist_taps": [{persist_taps}], "emit": [{emit}] }}
}}"#,
        from = window.0,
        to = window.1,
    )
}

/// An mc-bearing process: intrinsically valid AND (since the v2 executor) an
/// executable pipeline shape — `sweep -> monte_carlo` annotates each sweep
/// survivor. The two addressing-mode tests below run it over the [1, 2] 1970
/// window, so they refuse deterministically at the member-data seam.
const MC_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "process",
  "name": "mc-screen",
  "pipeline": [
    { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
    { "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 100, "block_len": 5 }
  ]
}"#;

/// Intrinsically valid but NOT an executable v2 shape: the annotator sits
/// before the population stage (`walk_forward` after `monte_carlo`). The
/// intrinsic tier deliberately permits this order (the shipped
/// `validate_process_permits_walk_forward_after_an_annotator` pin in
/// aura-research), so register accepts it; only `campaign run`'s preflight
/// refuses it.
const MC_BEFORE_WF_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "process",
  "name": "mc-before-wf",
  "pipeline": [
    { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
    { "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 100, "block_len": 5 },
    { "block": "std::walk_forward", "in_sample_ms": 1209600000, "out_of_sample_ms": 604800000,
      "step_ms": 604800000, "mode": "rolling", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" }
  ]
}"#;

/// An executable generalize-bearing shape (`sweep -> generalize`). The
/// refusal under test is the campaign-side static guard (std::generalize
/// needs >= 2 instruments), not the pipeline shape.
const GENERALIZE_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "process",
  "name": "gen-screen",
  "pipeline": [
    { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
    { "block": "std::generalize", "metric": "net_expectancy_r" }
  ]
}"#;

/// The minimal executable pipeline (one sweep stage).
const SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "process",
  "name": "sweep-only",
  "pipeline": [ { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" } ]
}"#;

/// The full annotated shape for the gated e2e: sweep -> gate -> walk_forward
/// -> monte_carlo. The gate (`n_trades ge 0`) passes every member, so
/// walk-forward always has survivors; the mc annotator bootstraps the pooled
/// per-window OOS trade-R series (200 resamples, block 5). Roller: 14d IS /
/// 7d OOS / 7d step in epoch-ms, tiling the ~30-day GER40 Sept-2024 campaign
/// window. NO generalize stage: this campaign has ONE instrument (a second
/// local archive is not guaranteed), and the single-instrument refusal is
/// pinned data-free in `campaign_run_refuses_single_instrument_generalize`.
const WF_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "process",
  "name": "screen-then-walkforward",
  "pipeline": [
    { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
    { "block": "std::gate", "all": [ { "metric": "n_trades", "cmp": "ge", "value": 0.0 } ] },
    { "block": "std::walk_forward", "in_sample_ms": 1209600000, "out_of_sample_ms": 604800000,
      "step_ms": 604800000, "mode": "rolling", "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "select": "argmax" },
    { "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 200, "block_len": 5 }
  ]
}"#;

/// `campaign run` outside a project refuses up front — before target
/// resolution, so not even the file-sugar registration touches a store.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_outside_project_refuses() {
    let dir = temp_cwd("campaign-run-outside-project");
    write_doc(&dir, "c.campaign.json", CAMPAIGN_DOC);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(&dir, &["campaign", "run", "c.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("campaign run needs a project"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        !dir.join("runs").exists(),
        "a refused run must not create a store outside a project"
    );
}

/// A target that is neither a readable file nor a 64-hex id refuses naming
/// both readings (inside the project, past the project gate).
#[test]
fn campaign_run_bogus_target_refuses() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "no-such-target"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("'no-such-target' is neither a readable .json file nor a 64-hex content id"),
        "stdout/stderr: {out}"
    );
}

/// A well-formed but unknown content id refuses with the store-miss prose.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_unknown_id_refuses() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let id = "0".repeat(64);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", &id]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains(&format!("no campaign {id} in the project store")),
        "stdout/stderr: {out}"
    );
}

/// The v2 boundary, order side: `[sweep, monte_carlo, walk_forward]` is
/// intrinsically valid — `process register` ACCEPTS it (asserted inside
/// `register_process_doc`; the intrinsic-tier ground is the shipped
/// `validate_process_permits_walk_forward_after_an_annotator` pin) — but the
/// executable pipeline shape fixes the suffix order (`std::sweep [std::gate]*
/// [std::walk_forward]? [std::monte_carlo]? [std::generalize]?`), so
/// `campaign run` refuses it at the data-free preflight, before any member
/// runs, with Debug-free PipelineShape prose.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_mc_before_walk_forward() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mcwf.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mcwf.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-mcwf-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "mcwf.process.json", MC_BEFORE_WF_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(dir, "mcwf.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "mcwf.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(out.contains("process pipeline is not executable:"), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("std::walk_forward cannot follow std::monte_carlo"),
        "the detail names the ordering violation: {out}"
    );
    assert!(!out.contains("not executable in v1"), "retired v1 prose resurfaced: {out}");
    assert!(!out.contains("PipelineShape"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}

/// The v2 boundary, campaign side: a generalize-bearing process is an
/// executable shape, but `std::generalize` needs >= 2 instruments in the
/// campaign — a STATIC preflight fact (the referential gate has run, no data
/// is read), so the single-GER40 fixture campaign refuses with exit 1 before
/// any member runs. This is the ONE home for the single-instrument refusal;
/// the gated real-data e2e does not duplicate it (its campaign is also
/// single-instrument, and this refusal is data-free by construction).
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_single_instrument_generalize() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("gen1.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("gen1.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-gen1-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "gen1.process.json", GENERALIZE_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(dir, "gen1.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "gen1.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("std::generalize needs at least 2"),
        "the refusal names the block and the minimum: {out}"
    );
    assert!(out.contains("1 instrument"), "the refusal names the available count: {out}");
    assert!(!out.contains("GeneralizeNeedsInstruments"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}

/// An executable generalize-bearing shape whose metric is a pip metric, not
/// an R metric (`total_pips` is a known, registered scalar — `process
/// register` accepts it — but not R-denominated).
const GENERALIZE_NON_R_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "process",
  "name": "gen-pip-screen",
  "pipeline": [
    { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
    { "block": "std::generalize", "metric": "total_pips" }
  ]
}"#;

/// The v2 boundary, metric side: `std::generalize`'s metric guard
/// (`check_r_metric`) is a STATIC preflight fact independent of the
/// instrument-arity guard above it in the same match arm — with >= 2
/// campaign instruments (so arity passes) and a pip metric, `campaign run`
/// must still refuse data-free, naming the metric, and never fall through to
/// the instrument-count prose or a Debug-formatted fault. A regression that
/// let the arity check short-circuit past the metric check (or vice versa)
/// would silently accept a pip-denominated `std::generalize`.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_generalize_non_r_metric() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("genpip.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("genpip.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-genpip-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "genpip.process.json", GENERALIZE_NON_R_PROCESS_DOC);
    // Two instruments (arity passes), so the metric guard is the one that
    // actually fires. The [1, 2] 1970 window never matters: this refusal is
    // data-free, before any member runs.
    let campaign_doc = format!(
        r#"{{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "campaign",
  "name": "run-seam-genpip",
  "data": {{ "instruments": ["GER40", "EURUSD"], "windows": [ {{ "from_ms": 1, "to_ms": 2 }} ] }},
  "strategies": [ {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{bp_id}" }},
                    "axes": {{ "fast.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [2, 4] }},
                              "slow.length": {{ "kind": "I64", "values": [8, 16] }} }} }} ],
  "process": {{ "ref": {{ "content_id": "{proc_id}" }} }},
  "seed": 7,
  "presentation": {{ "persist_taps": [], "emit": [] }}
}}"#
    );
    write_doc(dir, "genpip.campaign.json", &campaign_doc);
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "genpip.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("std::generalize metric \"total_pips\" is not an R metric"),
        "the refusal names the offending metric: {out}"
    );
    assert!(!out.contains("2 instrument"), "the arity guard must not fire when arity is fine: {out}");
    assert!(!out.contains("GeneralizeNonRMetric"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}

/// A v2 process doc with `std::walk_forward` following the annotator
/// `std::monte_carlo` — intrinsically valid (order across population vs.
/// annotator stages is not a document-tier concern), refused only by the
/// executor's v2 preflight shape guard.
const WF_AFTER_MC_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "process",
  "name": "wf-after-mc",
  "pipeline": [
    { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
    { "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 100, "block_len": 5 },
    { "block": "std::walk_forward", "in_sample_ms": 1209600000, "out_of_sample_ms": 604800000,
      "step_ms": 604800000, "mode": "rolling", "metric": "net_expectancy_r", "select": "argmax" }
  ]
}"#;

/// Property (0108 task 2, mirroring aura-research's characterization pin
/// `validate_process_permits_walk_forward_after_an_annotator`): the
/// intrinsic/executor tier boundary is observable across TWO CLI commands.
/// `process validate` accepts `[sweep, monte_carlo, walk_forward]` (exit 0 —
/// the document tier does not order population vs. annotator stages) while
/// `campaign run`'s v2 preflight refuses the very same document, before any
/// member executes (data-free: the [1, 2] 1970-epoch-ms window is never
/// reached), because `std::walk_forward` cannot follow the annotator
/// `std::monte_carlo`. A regression that let the executor silently accept the
/// intrinsic tier's looser order (or that widened the intrinsic tier to
/// match) would collapse this two-command divergence.
#[test]
fn process_validate_permits_wf_after_mc_but_campaign_run_refuses_it() {
    // intrinsic tier: no project needed, and it accepts the doc outright.
    let vdir = temp_cwd("wf-after-mc-validate");
    write_doc(&vdir, "wfmc.process.json", WF_AFTER_MC_PROCESS_DOC);
    let (vout, vcode) = run_code_in(&vdir, &["process", "validate", "wfmc.process.json"]);
    assert_eq!(vcode, Some(0), "intrinsic validate must accept sweep->mc->walk_forward: {vout}");
    assert!(
        vout.contains("process document valid (intrinsic): 3 pipeline blocks"),
        "stdout/stderr: {vout}"
    );

    // executor tier: campaign run's v2 preflight refuses the same shape.
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wfmc.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wfmc.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-wfmc-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "wfmc.process.json", WF_AFTER_MC_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(dir, "wfmc.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "wfmc.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("std::walk_forward cannot follow std::monte_carlo"),
        "stdout/stderr: {out}"
    );
    assert!(!out.contains("PipelineShape {"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}

/// Property (#205, fieldtest 0108 F6): `aura campaign validate` runs the
/// executor's data-free static preflight (`aura_campaign::preflight`) as a
/// THIRD tier, so a pure process-shape fault that needs no data is caught at
/// validate time, not only at `campaign run` time — "valid" now means
/// "runnable". Two faces of the one behaviour, both inside a project (the
/// tier needs the store to fetch the referenced process, like the referential
/// tier above it):
///   - an executable pipeline shape gains a third line, `campaign document
///     valid (executable): pipeline shape and static guards pass`, exit 0;
///   - a `[sweep, monte_carlo, walk_forward]` process — intrinsically valid
///     (`process register` accepts it) and referentially valid (its ref
///     resolves) yet not an executable shape — refuses at VALIDATE with the
///     executor fault header `campaign is not executable:` and the
///     `exec_fault_prose` shape detail, exit 1, before any member runs.
///
/// A regression that dropped the third tier would let an executor-unrunnable
/// shape validate clean (exit 0), the F6 friction.
#[test]
fn campaign_validate_runs_the_executor_preflight_as_a_third_tier() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("runnable.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("runnable.campaign.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wfmc.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wfmc.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-validate-3tier-seed");

    // Face 1 — the happy path: an executable pipeline shape (a bare
    // std::sweep). Intrinsic + referential pass today (exit 0), but the
    // executor tier is invisible; after #205 validate gains the third
    // "valid (executable)" line while staying exit 0.
    let ok_proc = register_process_doc(dir, "runnable.process.json", SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(dir, "runnable.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &ok_proc, (1, 2), "", ""));
    let (ok_out, ok_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "validate", "runnable.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(ok_code, Some(0), "an executable campaign validates clean: {ok_out}");
    assert!(
        ok_out.contains("campaign document valid (referential): all references resolve"),
        "the referential tier line survives the added third tier: {ok_out}"
    );
    assert!(
        ok_out.contains(
            "campaign document valid (executable): pipeline shape and static guards pass"
        ),
        "the new third (executor-preflight) tier line is emitted: {ok_out}"
    );

    // Face 2 — the refuse path: `[sweep, monte_carlo, walk_forward]` is
    // intrinsically valid (register exits 0, asserted in register_process_doc)
    // and referentially valid (same seeded blueprint + axes), so validate
    // reaches the third tier — which refuses the non-executable shape at
    // validate time (data-free: the [1, 2] 1970-epoch-ms window is never
    // reached), exit 1, with the executor fault header + the shape prose.
    let bad_proc = register_process_doc(dir, "wfmc.process.json", WF_AFTER_MC_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(dir, "wfmc.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &bad_proc, (1, 2), "", ""));
    let (bad_out, bad_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "validate", "wfmc.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(bad_code, Some(1), "an executor-unrunnable shape refuses at validate: {bad_out}");
    assert!(
        bad_out.contains("campaign is not executable:"),
        "the executor-tier fault header (mirrors 'campaign references do not resolve:'): {bad_out}"
    );
    assert!(
        bad_out.contains("std::walk_forward cannot follow std::monte_carlo"),
        "the shape prose names the ordering violation via exec_fault_prose: {bad_out}"
    );
    assert!(!bad_out.contains("PipelineShape"), "Debug leak: {bad_out}");
}

/// A v2 process doc with a static `std::monte_carlo resamples: 0` defect.
const ZERO_RESAMPLES_MC_PROCESS_DOC: &str = r#"{
  "format_version": 1,
  "kind": "process",
  "name": "zero-resamples-mc",
  "pipeline": [
    { "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn_normalized", "select": "argmax" },
    { "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 0, "block_len": 5 }
  ]
}"#;

/// Property (0108 task 2): `std::monte_carlo`'s `resamples > 0` guard is a
/// STATIC executor-preflight refusal, wired end to end from the on-disk
/// document through to CLI stdout, firing before any member runs (data-free:
/// the [1, 2] 1970-epoch-ms window is never reached) and naming the stage
/// index and the offending field. A regression that dropped the static guard
/// (deferring to the engine's runtime all-zero-resamples degenerate instead)
/// would let this refusal disappear or drift to a different message.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_refuses_zero_resamples_monte_carlo_before_any_member_runs() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("zeromc.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("zeromc.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-zeromc-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "zeromc.process.json", ZERO_RESAMPLES_MC_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(dir, "zeromc.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "zeromc.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("process stage 1: monte_carlo resamples must be > 0"),
        "stdout/stderr: {out}"
    );
    assert!(!out.contains("ZeroBootstrapParam"), "Debug leak: {out}");
}

/// Non-empty persist_taps defers LOUDLY, and the note's ORDER is pinned: it
/// prints before member execution, so it is asserted here on a run
/// that refuses at the member-data seam. The [1, 2] epoch-ms window (1970)
/// makes that refusal deterministic on every machine: a data-less host
/// refuses on missing geometry, a data-ful host on a window no archive file
/// overlaps — exit 1 either way, tap note already on stderr.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_persist_taps_deferred_loudly() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("taps.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("taps.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-taps-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "taps.process.json", SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(
        dir,
        "taps.campaign.json",
        &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "\"r_record\"", ""),
    );
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "taps.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("aura: persist_taps not yet honored (1 tap(s) ignored)"),
        "the tap note must precede the member-data refusal: {out}"
    );
    assert!(
        out.contains("no recorded geometry") || out.contains("no data for instrument"),
        "the refusal names the data condition: {out}"
    );
}

/// Gated real-data e2e (the `cli_run.rs` skip idiom): a full
/// sweep -> gate -> walk_forward -> monte_carlo campaign over GER40
/// Sept-2024 where the local archive is present — exit 0, emit-gated
/// family/selection lines, a final line parseable as JSON with top-level
/// `campaign_run` linking a sweep family id, a walk-forward family id, and a
/// pooled-OOS bootstrap on the terminal mc stage, and the
/// `campaign_runs.jsonl` sibling store written. Skips with a note elsewhere
/// so `cargo test --workspace` stays green on a data-less machine.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_real_e2e_sweep_gate_walkforward() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wf.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("wf.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-e2e-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "wf.process.json", WF_PROCESS_DOC);
    // The GER40 Sept-2024 window (inclusive Unix-ms) — the same gated window
    // cli_run.rs drives; ~30 days, so the (14d, 7d, 7d) roller tiles it.
    write_doc(
        dir,
        "wf.campaign.json",
        &campaign_doc_json(
            &bp_id,
            &proc_id,
            (1725148800000, 1727740799999),
            "",
            "\"family_table\", \"selection_report\"",
        ),
    );
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "wf.campaign.json"]);

    // Skip on a data-less machine: the member-data refusal, never a panic.
    if code == Some(1)
        && (out.contains("no recorded geometry") || out.contains("no data for instrument"))
    {
        eprintln!("skip: no local GER40 data for the campaign e2e");
        return;
    }

    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    let record_line = out
        .lines()
        .find(|l| l.starts_with("{\"campaign_run\":"))
        .expect("the always-on final campaign_run line");
    let v: serde_json::Value =
        serde_json::from_str(record_line).expect("campaign_run line parses as JSON");
    let cells = v["campaign_run"]["cells"].as_array().expect("cells array");
    assert_eq!(cells.len(), 1, "one (strategy, instrument, window) cell: {record_line}");
    let stages = cells[0]["stages"].as_array().expect("stages array");
    assert_eq!(
        stages.len(),
        4,
        "sweep + gate + walk_forward + monte_carlo realized: {record_line}"
    );
    assert!(
        stages[0]["family_id"].as_str().is_some(),
        "sweep stage links a family: {record_line}"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        stages[1]["survivor_ordinals"].as_array().map(|a| a.len()),
        Some(4),
        "the always-true gate keeps all four members: {record_line}"
    );
    assert!(
        stages[2]["family_id"].as_str().is_some(),
        "walk-forward stage links a family: {record_line}"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        stages[3]["block"].as_str(),
        Some("std::monte_carlo"),
        "the annotator stage is realized last: {record_line}"
    );
    let pooled = &stages[3]["bootstrap"]["pooled_oos"];
    assert!(
        pooled.is_object(),
        "an mc stage after walk_forward records ONE pooled-OOS bootstrap: {record_line}"
    );
    assert_eq!(
        pooled["n_resamples"].as_u64(),
        Some(200),
        "the bootstrap carries the doc's resamples verbatim: {record_line}"
    );
    // Emit-gated lines: per-member family_table lines (4 sweep members plus
    // the walk-forward OOS members) and at least one selection_report line.
    assert!(
        out.lines().filter(|l| l.starts_with("{\"family_id\":")).count() >= 4,
        "family_table member lines emitted: {out}"
    );
    assert!(
        out.lines().any(|l| l.starts_with("{\"selection_report\":")),
        "selection_report line emitted: {out}"
    );
    // The registry's new sibling store carries the realization record.
    assert!(
        runs_dir.join("campaign_runs.jsonl").is_file(),
        "campaign_runs.jsonl written beside runs.jsonl"
    );
}

/// Gated real-data e2e, the OTHER mc bootstrap input shape (#200 d1): with no
/// walk_forward in the pipeline (`sweep -> monte_carlo`), the terminal
/// annotator's dual-input dispatch takes the `PerSurvivor` arm, not
/// `PooledOos` — one bootstrap per surviving sweep member, keyed by the
/// member's ordinal into the sweep family, rather than one pooled bootstrap
/// over walk-forward OOS windows. `campaign_run_real_e2e_sweep_gate_walkforward`
/// above only exercises `PooledOos`; this is the only e2e coverage of
/// `PerSurvivor` with real data (the addressing-mode tests use it only as a
/// data-free refusal fixture).
#[test]
fn campaign_run_real_e2e_sweep_monte_carlo_per_survivor() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mc.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mc.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-mc-persurvivor-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "mc.process.json", MC_PROCESS_DOC);
    // Same GER40 Sept-2024 window as the gated wf e2e above.
    write_doc(
        dir,
        "mc.campaign.json",
        &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1725148800000, 1727740799999), "", ""),
    );
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "mc.campaign.json"]);

    // Skip on a data-less machine: the member-data refusal, never a panic.
    if code == Some(1)
        && (out.contains("no recorded geometry") || out.contains("no data for instrument"))
    {
        eprintln!("skip: no local GER40 data for the campaign e2e");
        return;
    }

    assert_eq!(code, Some(0), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    let record_line = out
        .lines()
        .find(|l| l.starts_with("{\"campaign_run\":"))
        .expect("the always-on final campaign_run line");
    let v: serde_json::Value =
        serde_json::from_str(record_line).expect("campaign_run line parses as JSON");
    let cells = v["campaign_run"]["cells"].as_array().expect("cells array");
    let stages = cells[0]["stages"].as_array().expect("stages array");
    assert_eq!(stages.len(), 2, "sweep + monte_carlo realized: {record_line}");
    assert_eq!(
        stages[1]["block"].as_str(),
        Some("std::monte_carlo"),
        "the annotator stage is realized last: {record_line}"
    );
    let per_survivor = stages[1]["bootstrap"]["per_survivor"]
        .as_array()
        .expect("no walk_forward precedes: the PerSurvivor arm, not pooled_oos");
    assert_eq!(
        per_survivor.len(),
        4,
        "one bootstrap per surviving sweep member (4 axis combinations, no gate): {record_line}"
    );
    let (ordinal, bootstrap) = (per_survivor[0][0].as_u64(), &per_survivor[0][1]);
    assert_eq!(ordinal, Some(0), "each entry is keyed by ordinal into the sweep family: {record_line}");
    assert_eq!(
        bootstrap["n_resamples"].as_u64(),
        Some(100),
        "the bootstrap carries the doc's resamples verbatim: {record_line}"
    );
}

/// `run_campaign` resolves a target two ways — a readable file (register-then-
/// run sugar) or a bare content id (direct store address) — then funnels BOTH
/// through one shared post-resolution path: "fetch the stored canonical bytes
/// by id ... so file addressing and id addressing produce the same
/// realization by construction" (the driver's own doc comment). This pins
/// that property observably: registering a document and then running it once
/// by FILE and once by its own resulting content ID must refuse with the
/// byte-identical prose — proof the two addressing modes are not two
/// independently drifting code paths. No real data needed: with the [1, 2]
/// 1970 window, both runs pass the (now mc-permitting) preflight and refuse
/// at the member-data seam — no recorded geometry on a data-less host, no
/// overlapping archive window on a data-ful one — exit 1 and byte-identical
/// prose either way (the message depends only on env/instrument/window).
#[test]
fn campaign_run_by_content_id_matches_file_sugar_refusal() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mc2.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("mc2.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-id-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "mc2.process.json", MC_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(dir, "mc2.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));

    let (file_out, file_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "mc2.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(file_code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {file_out}");

    let (reg_out, reg_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "register", "mc2.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(reg_code, Some(0), "register failed: {reg_out}");
    let id = reg_out
        .lines()
        .find(|l| l.starts_with("registered campaign "))
        .expect("register line")
        .trim_start_matches("registered campaign ")
        .split(' ')
        .next()
        .expect("id")
        .trim_start_matches("content:")
        .to_string();
    let (id_out, id_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", &id]);
    assert_eq!(id_code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {id_out}");

    let file_line = file_out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("aura: ")).expect("file refusal line");
    let id_line = id_out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("aura: ")).expect("id refusal line");
    assert!(
        file_line.contains("no recorded geometry") || file_line.contains("no data for instrument"),
        "the refusal is the member-data seam (mc processes execute now): {file_line}"
    );
    assert_eq!(file_line, id_line, "file- and id-addressed runs must refuse identically");
}

/// #194 (the prefix trap): a `campaign run` target may carry the display
/// `content:` prefix copied verbatim from the tool's own register/introspect
/// output — the CLI strips it and resolves the bare store address. Pinned
/// observably: running the SAME registered campaign by bare id and by its
/// `content:`-prefixed form must refuse identically (proof the prefix is
/// stripped, not read as a second, unresolvable address). Both refuse at the
/// member-data seam (the mc process is executable in v2; the [1, 2] 1970
/// window guarantees a deterministic data refusal), so no real data is
/// needed.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_tolerates_content_prefix_on_target() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("prefix.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("prefix.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let bp_id = seed_blueprint(dir, "campaign-run-prefix-seed");
    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "prefix.process.json", MC_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(dir, "prefix.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));

    let (reg_out, reg_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "register", "prefix.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(reg_code, Some(0), "register failed: {reg_out}");
    let id = reg_out
        .lines()
        .find(|l| l.starts_with("registered campaign "))
        .expect("register line")
        .trim_start_matches("registered campaign ")
        .split(' ')
        .next()
        .expect("id")
        .trim_start_matches("content:")
        .to_string();

    let (bare_out, _) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", &id]);
    let (pfx_out, _) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", &format!("content:{id}")]);

    let pfx_line = pfx_out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("aura: ")).expect("prefixed refusal line");
    assert!(
        !pfx_line.contains("neither a readable .json file nor a 64-hex content id"),
        "a content:-prefixed target must resolve as the bare id, not refuse as an unknown target: {pfx_line}"
    );
    let bare_line = bare_out.lines().find(|l| l.starts_with("aura: ")).expect("bare refusal line");
    assert!(
        bare_line.contains("no recorded geometry") || bare_line.contains("no data for instrument"),
        "the refusal is the member-data seam (mc processes execute now): {bare_line}"
    );
    assert_eq!(bare_line, pfx_line, "bare-id and content:-prefixed runs must resolve identically");
}

/// Property (#196 on-ramp x #198 executor): a blueprint registered through
/// `aura graph register` — NOT the pre-#196 `aura sweep` side-effect
/// `seed_blueprint` relies on elsewhere in this file — is a fully valid
/// campaign strategy ref: its content id resolves through the referential
/// gate, and its raw param space (`fast.length`/`slow.length`, the same
/// names `graph introspect --params` reports for this fixture) binds against
/// the campaign document's axes in `bind_axes`. This closes fieldtest F5
/// ("strategy refs unresolvable from the public surface — no blueprint
/// register verb") end to end: the run reaches the member-data seam (the
/// same [1, 2] 1970 window used elsewhere in this file for a deterministic,
/// data-free refusal) rather than failing earlier at referencing or binding.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_accepts_a_graph_register_seeded_strategy() {
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![
        ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("onramp.process.json")),
        ScratchPath::File(dir.join("onramp.campaign.json")),
    ]);
    let open_bp = format!("{}/tests/fixtures/sma_signal_open.json", env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR"));
    let (reg_out, reg_code) = run_code_in(dir, &["graph", "register", &open_bp]);
    assert_eq!(reg_code, Some(0), "graph register failed: {reg_out}");
    let bp_id = reg_out
        .lines()
        .find(|l| l.starts_with("registered blueprint "))
        .expect("register line")
        .trim_start_matches("registered blueprint ")
        .split(' ')
        .next()
        .expect("id")
        .trim_start_matches("content:")
        .to_string();

    let proc_id = register_process_doc(dir, "onramp.process.json", SWEEP_ONLY_PROCESS_DOC);
    write_doc(dir, "onramp.campaign.json", &campaign_doc_json(&bp_id, &proc_id, (1, 2), "", ""));
    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "onramp.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("no recorded geometry") || out.contains("no data for instrument"),
        "referencing + axis-binding must succeed, reaching the member-data \
         seam rather than a referential or bind refusal: {out}"
    );
}

/// `campaign run`'s file-sugar branch calls `parse_valid_campaign` directly
/// (unwrapped), the SAME intrinsic validator `campaign register` calls but
/// wraps in its own "refusing to register:" prefix. This pins that `run`
/// does NOT inherit register's wrapper — an intrinsically invalid document
/// refuses with the bare "campaign document invalid:" prose — and, like
/// register, never touches the store for it. No project scaffolding, no
/// data, no seeded blueprint needed: the refusal fires before any of that is
/// read.
#[test]
fn campaign_run_invalid_file_refuses_before_touching_store() {
    // Run inside the built project (campaign run needs one, per the project
    // gate); the document fails intrinsic validation before any store or
    // referential check is reached, so the project's own store is untouched.
    let _fixture = project_lock();
    let dir = built_project();
    let runs_dir = dir.join("runs");
    std::fs::remove_dir_all(&runs_dir).ok();
    let bad = CAMPAIGN_DOC.replacen(r#""values": [8]"#, r#""values": []"#, 1);
    let bad_path = write_doc(dir, "bad.campaign.json", &bad);
    let _cleanup = ScratchGuard(vec![ScratchPath::Dir(runs_dir.clone()), ScratchPath::File(bad_path)]);

    let (out, code) = run_code_in(dir, &["campaign", "run", "bad.campaign.json"]);
    assert_eq!(code, Some(1), "stdout/stderr: {out}");
    assert!(
        out.contains("aura: campaign document invalid:"),
        "run must surface the bare doc-tier prose, not register's wrapper: {out}"
    );
    assert!(
        out.contains("axes.fast: an axis is a non-empty finite set"),
        "the doc-tier fault names the offending axis: {out}"
    );
    assert!(!out.contains("refusing to register:"), "run must not reuse register's prefix: {out}");
    assert!(
        !dir.join("runs").join("campaigns").exists(),
        "an invalid document must not create a store entry"
    );
}