The #28 cycle-close audit found aura graph <file> silently rendered the embedded sample at exit 0 when the positional named an unreadable blueprint (typo, nonexistent path, wrong extension): is_blueprint_file returns None both for "no positional" and for a bad arg, and dispatch_graph's None arm conflated them — re-introducing the exact #28 "I asked for my graph, got the sample" surprise in the error path, and diverging from every sibling verb (a bad blueprint arg is a usage fault, exit 2, per C14). Split the None arm: no positional -> the sample (unchanged); a positional that is not a readable .json -> a usage error naming the arg, exit 2, mirroring dispatch_run. Also close the paired doc drift the audit flagged: the README blueprint-verb table and the authoring guide now document the aura graph <file> render surface, absent while graph was the last sample-bound verb. refs #28
19 KiB
Authoring guide: op-scripts, process documents, campaign documents
docs/project-layout.md describes the shape of a project and the arc of a
research session; this document is the practical companion for the three
JSON artifact kinds you author headlessly along that arc:
- an op-script (role 6a) — builds a node graph (a strategy blueprint)
through
aura graph build; - a process document (role 5) — a named validation/eval methodology
through
aura process validate|introspect|register; - a campaign document (role 6b) — experiment intent (instruments ×
windows × strategy × axes × process) through
aura campaign validate|introspect|register|run.
Each section below is a worked, verified example — every command shown was
run against this repo and the output is transcribed, not invented. The why
of this three-artifact split (closed-vocabulary data, never a logic DSL)
lives in the design ledger (docs/design/INDEX.md, C20/C25) and the
glossary; this document only teaches the shape.
1. Op-scripts — building a strategy blueprint by hand
An op-script is a JSON array of ops, replayed in order to construct a
node graph. aura graph build reads the op-script from stdin (there is
no file argument) and prints the canonical blueprint envelope to stdout:
$ aura graph build < smacross.json > blueprint.json
Nodes are referenced by an identifier (given by add, see below); ports
are dotted <identifier>.<port> on both sides of a wire.
The six ops
| op | JSON shape | does |
|---|---|---|
source |
{"op":"source","role":<str>,"kind":<ScalarKind>} |
reserve a bound root source role of kind — a real input the harness feeds (e.g. "price"). |
input |
{"op":"input","role":<str>} |
reserve an open root input role (kind inferred from the slots it feeds) — for a fragment meant to be wired by an enclosing graph. A standalone document built with aura graph build finalizes as a closed root, so an input role that is never bound refuses at the end: finalize: root input role <name> is unbound. |
add |
{"op":"add","type":<TypeId>,"name":<str>?,"bind":{<param>:<Scalar>}?} |
instantiate a node of a type in the closed vocabulary (aura graph introspect --vocabulary). name becomes the node's identifier for later ops (default: the type's own lowercase label — two unnamed nodes of the same type then collide). bind sets zero or more of its params. |
feed |
{"op":"feed","role":<str>,"into":[<port>, …]} |
fan a previously-declared role into one or more interior input slots, all-or-nothing (a failing target leaves none of the batch wired). |
connect |
{"op":"connect","from":<port>,"to":<port>} |
wire one interior output field to one interior input slot. A connect that would close a dataflow cycle is rejected immediately — the only legal feedback path is an explicit delay/state node (domain invariant 5). |
expose |
{"op":"expose","from":<port>,"as":<str>} |
promote an interior output field to a boundary output under the alias as — the only op whose name key is a real alias (contrast add's name, which is an identifier, not a rename). |
Value forms are the typed-tag representations used everywhere in this family of artifacts:
- a bind value is
{"I64":2}/{"F64":0.5}/{"Bool":true}/{"Timestamp":<i64 ms>}; - a
kindfield is the capitalizedScalarKindname:"I64"|"F64"|"Bool"|"Timestamp".
Worked example: an SMA-crossover bias strategy
[
{"op": "source", "role": "price", "kind": "F64"},
{"op": "add", "type": "SMA", "name": "fast"},
{"op": "add", "type": "SMA", "name": "slow"},
{"op": "feed", "role": "price", "into": ["fast.series", "slow.series"]},
{"op": "add", "type": "Sub", "name": "sub"},
{"op": "connect", "from": "fast.value", "to": "sub.lhs"},
{"op": "connect", "from": "slow.value", "to": "sub.rhs"},
{"op": "add", "type": "Bias", "name": "bias"},
{"op": "connect", "from": "sub.value", "to": "bias.signal"},
{"op": "expose", "from": "bias.bias", "as": "bias"}
]
(fast.length, slow.length, and bias.scale are all left unbound here on
purpose — three open campaign axes, see §3. This is the milestone fieldtest
corpus's own example, verified below; byte-identical to the on-disk
fieldtests/milestone-research-artifacts/mra_1_strategy_smacross.json.)
A bind in an add op pins that param to a fixed value and removes it
from the sweepable param space: a bound param is closed — it never shows
up in --params/--list-axes, and no campaign axis and no aura sweep --axis can reopen it. bind is for a constant the strategy never varies;
leave a param unbound, as all three are here, to keep it open for sweeping.
Commands
$ aura graph build < smacross.json
{"format_version":1,"blueprint":{"name":"graph","nodes":[...],"edges":[...],
"input_roles":[{"name":"price",...,"source":"F64"}],"output":[...]}}
The built blueprint renders visually, too: aura graph blueprint.json emits an
interactive HTML DAG so a mis-wire is visible before any run (aura graph with
no file renders the built-in sample; a named-but-unreadable file is a usage
error). Introspection is build-free wherever possible:
$ aura graph introspect --vocabulary # one node type per line
$ aura graph introspect --node SMA # ports + params of one type
SMA
in series:F64
out value:F64
param length:I64 (bind {"I64": <v>})
$ aura graph introspect --unwired < partial.json # open slots of a partial op-script
sub.rhs:F64
$ aura graph introspect --content-id smacross.json # SHA-256 of the canonical form
597d719b7ac607158cda3e68cd497387620397a5e93087e23da512876dafba9a
$ aura graph introspect --content-id smacross.json --identity-id # + debug-name-blind identity id, combinable
597d719b7ac607158cda3e68cd497387620397a5e93087e23da512876dafba9a
41bab46ce78356eeab2d2a4e03daaf2117eb970a1c3ef880264553bf662453a4
$ aura graph introspect --params smacross.json # the raw param-space namespace (what a campaign's axes bind against)
fast.length:I64
slow.length:I64
bias.scale:F64
These printed names are the raw param-space namespace: op-script params
and a campaign document's strategies[].axes keys (§3) share this one raw
form. There is a third, wrapped surface: the dissolved aura sweep <blueprint> --axis CLI (glossary sweep) accepts only the names aura sweep <blueprint> --list-axes prints — the raw name prefixed with the
root-composite instance name, graph.<param> — never the raw form; the
campaign document the sweep sugar generates still stores the raw form
(#210):
raw (--params, campaign axes): fast.length
wrapped (--list-axes, --axis): graph.fast.length
--content-id, --identity-id, --params, and graph register all accept
either shape: the raw op-script array or an already-built #155
blueprint envelope (object) — shape-discriminated automatically, so you
never have to build first just to hash or register:
$ aura graph register smacross.json # inside a project (Aura.toml present)
registered blueprint 597d719b7ac607158cda3e68cd497387620397a5e93087e23da512876dafba9a (…/runs/blueprints/597d…json)
The printed content id is the address a campaign document's strategies[].ref
points at (§3).
2. Process documents — a validation methodology (role 5)
A process document is a named, versionable pipeline of std stage blocks over a shared metric vocabulary. Discover the block vocabulary and each block's typed slots headlessly:
$ aura process introspect --vocabulary
std::sweep evaluate the campaign's axes-space; reduce members to R metrics; optionally select a winner (the selection group metric+select is all-or-nothing; omitted = selection-free, terminal-stage-only)
std::gate filter survivors by a conjunction of typed metric predicates
std::walk_forward rolling in-sample optimize + out-of-sample test
std::monte_carlo R-bootstrap over realised R (terminal annotator): ...
std::generalize cross-instrument worst-case floor (terminal annotator): ...
$ aura process introspect --block std::sweep
std::sweep — evaluate the campaign's axes-space; reduce members to R metrics; optionally select a winner (the selection group metric+select is all-or-nothing; omitted = selection-free, terminal-stage-only)
metric optional, metric name (see metric_vocabulary)
select optional, select rule: argmax | plateau:mean | plateau:worst
deflate optional, bool
metric and select form one selection group: all-or-nothing (a
document naming one without the other is refused, "the selection group is
all-or-nothing"), deflate composes only when the group is present. Omit
the group entirely for a selection-free sweep — the family itself is
the result, no winner is chosen. A selection-free sweep is only legal as
the pipeline's last stage (the executor's preflight refuses one followed
by any other block, since a downstream stage would have no nominee to
consume):
{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "explore-only-sweep",
"pipeline": [ { "block": "std::sweep" } ]
}
The executor records this stage's family (every member run) but no
StageSelection and no nominee — recording a winner here would fabricate a
selection intent the document never expressed.
Worked example: full v2 pipeline (sweep → gate → walk-forward → Monte-Carlo → generalize)
{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "process",
"name": "mra-full-v2-sweep-gate-wf-mc-generalize",
"description": "Full v2 anti-false-discovery pipeline.",
"pipeline": [
{ "block": "std::sweep", "metric": "sqn", "select": "argmax", "deflate": true },
{ "block": "std::gate", "all": [ { "metric": "expectancy_r", "cmp": "gt", "value": 0.0 } ] },
{ "block": "std::walk_forward", "in_sample_ms": 1209600000, "out_of_sample_ms": 604800000, "step_ms": 604800000, "mode": "rolling", "metric": "sqn", "select": "argmax" },
{ "block": "std::monte_carlo", "resamples": 1000, "block_len": 5 },
{ "block": "std::generalize", "metric": "expectancy_r" }
]
}
(description is optional; everything else in the envelope — format_version,
kind, name, pipeline — is required, as aura process introspect --unwired
over a bare {} will tell you.)
$ aura process validate mra_2_process_full_v2.json
process document valid (intrinsic): 5 pipeline blocks, 1 gate predicates
$ aura process register mra_2_process_full_v2.json # inside a project
registered process cd91270ca61ad42f56939231a7803a1d6d7aaa2b70bf79cde9da9284683b86b9 (…/runs/processes/cd91…json)
The metric vocabulary — discoverable, not hand-copied
aura process introspect --metrics (equivalently aura campaign introspect --metrics — same roster) enumerates every metric name annotated with its
role, so you never have to guess which metrics a select/gate/generalize
field will accept:
$ aura process introspect --metrics
expectancy_r rankable | gate | generalize
win_rate gate
avg_win_r gate
avg_loss_r gate
profit_factor gate
max_r_drawdown gate
sqn rankable | gate | generalize
sqn_normalized rankable | gate | generalize
net_expectancy_r rankable | gate | generalize
n_trades gate
n_open_at_end gate
total_pips rankable | gate
max_drawdown rankable | gate
bias_sign_flips rankable | gate
deflated_score annotation
overfit_probability annotation
neighbourhood_score annotation
Read the three tags as three separate questions about one metric name:
rankable— can this name be used as astd::sweep/std::walk_forwardselectmetric (the field a winner is chosen by)? This is the small subset every strategy run always produces cheaply.gate— can this name be used in astd::gatepredicate (a per-member filter)? This roster is a superset ofrankable— most emitted metrics are filterable even when they make a poor ranking criterion.| generalizesuffix — is this name usable asstd::generalize'smetric(needs an R-expectancy-shaped metric to floor across instruments)?
That is why, for example, profit_factor shows up tagged only gate: every
member's metrics table carries it (so you can gate on it, e.g. "keep only
profit_factor > 1.0"), but it is not in the small ranking-eligible roster,
so a std::sweep with "select": "argmax" cannot select on it, and
std::generalize cannot floor across instruments on it either. Attempting
either produces the same intrinsic refusal that names the metric and points
back at this verb (aura process introspect --metrics) rather than leaving
you to search the glossary.
3. Campaign documents — experiment intent over instruments and windows
A campaign document names the data (instruments × windows), one or more strategies (by blueprint content/identity id) with their param axes, a process reference, and what to persist/emit.
$ aura campaign introspect --unwired bare.json # bare.json contains just {}
open slot: format_version (required, must be 1)
open slot: kind (required, must be "campaign")
open slot: name (required, string)
open slot: data (required section: instruments + windows)
open slot: risk (optional, list of stop regimes { vol: { length, k } }; absent = one default regime)
open slot: strategies (required, non-empty list of { ref, axes })
open slot: process.ref (required, content id of a process document)
open slot: seed (required, non-negative integer)
open slot: presentation (required section: persist_taps (equity | exposure | r_equity | net_r_equity) + emit)
Worked example: two instruments, one strategy, four axis points, two stop regimes
{
"format_version": 1,
"kind": "campaign",
"name": "mra-ger40-fra40-smacross-full-v2",
"seed": 42,
"data": {
"instruments": ["GER40", "FRA40"],
"windows": [ { "from_ms": 1725148800000, "to_ms": 1727740800000 } ]
},
"risk": [
{ "vol": { "length": 3, "k": 1.5 } },
{ "vol": { "length": 3, "k": 3.0 } }
],
"strategies": [
{
"ref": { "content_id": "597d719b7ac607158cda3e68cd497387620397a5e93087e23da512876dafba9a" },
"axes": {
"fast.length": { "kind": "I64", "values": [2, 4] },
"slow.length": { "kind": "I64", "values": [8, 16] },
"bias.scale": { "kind": "F64", "values": [0.5] }
}
}
],
"process": { "ref": { "content_id": "cd91270ca61ad42f56939231a7803a1d6d7aaa2b70bf79cde9da9284683b86b9" } },
"presentation": { "persist_taps": ["equity", "r_equity"], "emit": ["family_table", "selection_report"] }
}
The strategies[].ref.content_id and process.ref.content_id are exactly
the ids printed by aura graph register / aura process register above —
a campaign never inlines a strategy or process body, only its content id.
Each axis name (fast.length, …) must name an open param of the referenced
blueprint (aura graph introspect --params, §1) and declare that param's
ScalarKind.
The optional risk list is the campaign's structural risk axis: every cell
runs under every listed stop regime, so cells differ by execution discipline,
never by signal — the regime's stop defines the risk unit R. Absent or empty,
the matrix runs one implicit default regime (the same vol regime the
orchestration verbs bind when their stop flags are omitted).
Validate — three tiers, honest degradation
$ aura campaign validate mra_3_campaign_full_v2.json # outside any project
campaign document valid (intrinsic): 1 strategy(ies), 3 axes (4 points), 2 instrument(s), 1 window(s), 2 regime(s) — 4 cell(s)
referential checks skipped (no Aura.toml found up from /home/…)
Inside a project, with the strategy blueprint and process both already registered, the same command runs two further tiers:
$ aura campaign validate mra_3_campaign_full_v2.json # inside a project, refs registered
campaign document valid (intrinsic): 1 strategy(ies), 3 axes (4 points), 2 instrument(s), 1 window(s), 2 regime(s) — 4 cell(s)
campaign document valid (referential): all references resolve, axes are in the param space
campaign document valid (executable): pipeline shape and static guards pass
- intrinsic — the document's own shape is well-formed (always checked).
- referential — every
refresolves in the project's store and every axis names a real, correctly-typed open param (needs a project). - executable — the process pipeline's static guards pass against this
campaign's shape (e.g.
std::generalizeneeds ≥ 2 instruments) — a data-free preflight, so "valid" here means "runnable" (needs a project; it does not fetch or touch market data).
Register and run
$ aura campaign register mra_3_campaign_full_v2.json
registered campaign 42edebd2159de708009ba21e1ed4aea2cffabc373bf761c5765f79c190b677bd (…/runs/campaigns/42ed…json)
$ aura campaign run 42edebd2159de708009ba21e1ed4aea2cffabc373bf761c5765f79c190b677bd
{"family_id":"42edebd2-0-GER40-w0-s0-0","report":{...}}
{"family_id":"42edebd2-0-GER40-w0-s0-0-r1","report":{...}}
…
{"campaign_run":{"campaign":"42edebd2…","process":"cd9127…","run":0,"seed":42,
"cells":[{"strategy":"597d719b…","instrument":"GER40","window_ms":[...],
"regime":{"vol":{"length":3,"k":1.5}},"stages":[
{"block":"std::sweep",...},{"block":"std::gate","survivor_ordinals":[0,1,2]},
{"block":"std::walk_forward",...},{"block":"std::monte_carlo","bootstrap":{"pooled_oos":{...}}}]},
{"strategy":"597d719b…","instrument":"GER40","regime":{"vol":{"length":3,"k":3.0}},"regime_ordinal":1,...},
{"strategy":"597d719b…","instrument":"FRA40",...},
{"strategy":"597d719b…","instrument":"FRA40","regime_ordinal":1,...}],
"generalizations":[{"strategy_ordinal":0,"window_ordinal":0,
"generalization":{"selection_metric":"expectancy_r","n_instruments":2,
"worst_case":0.0436…,"sign_agreement":2,"per_instrument":[["GER40",0.0436…],["FRA40",0.0484…]]},
"winners":[...]},
{"strategy_ordinal":0,"window_ordinal":0,"regime_ordinal":1,...}],
"trace_name":"42edebd2-0"}}
With two stop regimes every (instrument, window) cell runs twice — the four
cells above are the "4 cell(s)" the validate summary counted. The second
regime's family ids and trace dirs carry the -r1 ordinal suffix (the
default/first regime stays unsuffixed), each cell record names its regime,
and generalization is keyed per regime — regimes are compared, never pooled.
aura campaign run is register-then-run sugar for a .json file, but the
canonical address is always the content id — running a bare file the first
time registers it implicitly. aura campaign runs lists stored
realizations; aura campaign runs <id> dumps the bare stored record(s) (not
the {"campaign_run": …} emit wrapper above). If presentation.persist_taps
is non-empty, the run also persists the named taps under
runs/traces/<trace_name>/…, chartable with aura chart.