Architect review of b672a37..HEAD. What holds: emitted templates match
the settled contracts (Aura.toml paths-only per C17, cdylib + empty
[workspace] per C16, ::-namespaced ids per the charter, the C14 exit
partition in dispatch_new); the load-bypass guard is narrow and sound
(only the new-project verb exempted, the load arm byte-unchanged for
every other verb); e2e coverage is real (scaffold -> build -> run twice
byte-identical, namespace stamped, introspection, four refusals, the
unbuilt-tree bypass, plus the additive namespace-override test).
Regression: cargo build --workspace rc=0; cargo test --workspace 873
passed / 0 failed (project_new 6/6); clippy --workspace --all-targets
-D warnings rc=0; cargo doc --workspace --no-deps 0 warnings. No
baselines exist to move, so nothing to ratify.
Drift resolved in this commit: three doc mirrors still framing the
scaffolder as future — project-layout.md's 'the future aura new
scaffolder will emit this line; until then, add it by hand', the C24
status paragraph's 'what remains open is the aura new scaffolder (the
milestone's next cycle)', and the #109 open-thread bullet's 'the aura
new scaffolder and the experiment-builder API remain open' — all
rewritten to the landed reading (only the experiment-builder API stays
open in that layer).
Carried debt, filed forward: the scaffold templates and the
demo-project fixture encode one project shape twice with no lockstep
guard and deliberate cosmetic divergences (#181, idea — needs a design
pass, not a mechanical edit).
Process note: one mid-cycle plan-fix commit (derive(Debug) on a
plan-prescribed struct whose own test code required it) — the
implement loop's spec gate correctly blocked the necessary deviation;
resolution followed the fix-plan/commit-subset/re-run path.
Ephemeral cycle artifacts removed per convention: spec 0103, plan 0103.
refs #180
Brummel
d5c4361a97