7e195f66b7
End-to-end milestone fieldtest (closing gate) for the "Construction layer" milestone (#12 composites + #13 aura graph render). Four real downstream tasks authored against the PUBLIC interface only (ledger + doc-comments + re-exports + the aura CLI), under fieldtests/milestone-construction-layer/: mc_1 — author a named sma_cross composite, build a Blueprint, compile + bootstrap + run (12 populated equity rows); mc_2 — correct vs fast/slow-swapped cross: labels + graph-as-data differ observably (the headline mis-wire-visible property); mc_3 — composite-nested-in-composite inlines and runs; mc_4 — walk the built graph via the read-only accessors, no engine internals. Roll-up: friction_found, NO bugs. The milestone delivers its core promise — fractal authoring -> compile -> bootstrap -> run, introspection as graph-as-data, and param-carrying labels that make a mis-wire readable. None of the findings block the gate. Findings filed to the forward queue (not fixed here): - #28 (feature) — the headline friction: `aura graph` renders only the built-in sample and the render adapter is CLI-private, so a consumer can't render their OWN graph. Subsumes the reachability of #26 (the nested-render panic is structurally unreachable until the render is parameterizable). Likely next (consumer-project / World) milestone. - #29 (idea) — aura-engine doesn't re-export the scalar vocabulary (ScalarKind etc.) a graph-builder needs; one-crate ergonomics tidy. - #16 (comment) — `aura graph` arg policy (help / unknown-arg) should unify with the still-open `aura run` strictness question. The fieldtester read no implementation source; all artefacts are the consumer crate + the two live render captures (render_clustered.txt / render_compiled.txt, byte-identical across runs).
113 lines
4.1 KiB
Rust
113 lines
4.1 KiB
Rust
// Milestone fieldtest — axis (d): introspect a built Blueprint via the
|
|
// read-only graph-as-data accessors — can a consumer walk the graph as data
|
|
// WITHOUT reading engine internals?
|
|
//
|
|
// Accessors under test (all public, from rustdoc):
|
|
// Blueprint::nodes() / sources() / edges()
|
|
// Composite::name() / nodes() / edges() / input_roles() / output()
|
|
// BlueprintNode::{Leaf, Composite}; Node::label() on a boxed leaf
|
|
//
|
|
// Public interface only.
|
|
|
|
use aura_core::ScalarKind;
|
|
use aura_engine::{Blueprint, BlueprintNode, Composite, Edge, OutPort, SourceSpec, Target};
|
|
// NB (fieldtest finding): `aura_engine::ScalarKind` does NOT resolve — the
|
|
// construction surface (aura-engine) does not re-export the core scalar
|
|
// vocabulary (ScalarKind / Scalar / Firing) that a graph-builder needs. A
|
|
// downstream author building a Blueprint must reach into aura_core directly.
|
|
// Recorded as friction in the spec. `node.label()` below dispatches on the
|
|
// boxed leaf via the Node trait object without an explicit `use` of Node.
|
|
|
|
fn sma_cross() -> Composite {
|
|
Composite::new(
|
|
"sma_cross",
|
|
vec![
|
|
BlueprintNode::from(aura_std::Sma::new(2)),
|
|
BlueprintNode::from(aura_std::Sma::new(4)),
|
|
BlueprintNode::from(aura_std::Sub::new()),
|
|
],
|
|
vec![
|
|
Edge { from: 0, to: 2, slot: 0, from_field: 0 },
|
|
Edge { from: 1, to: 2, slot: 1, from_field: 0 },
|
|
],
|
|
vec![vec![Target { node: 0, slot: 0 }, Target { node: 1, slot: 0 }]],
|
|
OutPort { node: 2, field: 0 },
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn describe_node(prefix: &str, n: &BlueprintNode) {
|
|
match n {
|
|
BlueprintNode::Leaf(node) => {
|
|
let sch = node.schema();
|
|
println!(
|
|
"{prefix}LEAF {:<14} inputs={} output_fields={}",
|
|
node.label(),
|
|
sch.inputs.len(),
|
|
sch.output.len()
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
BlueprintNode::Composite(c) => {
|
|
println!(
|
|
"{prefix}COMPOSITE name={:?} interior_items={} roles={} out=({},{})",
|
|
c.name(),
|
|
c.nodes().len(),
|
|
c.input_roles().len(),
|
|
c.output().node,
|
|
c.output().field,
|
|
);
|
|
for inner in c.nodes() {
|
|
describe_node(&format!("{prefix} "), inner);
|
|
}
|
|
for (r, targets) in c.input_roles().iter().enumerate() {
|
|
println!("{prefix} role[{r}] fans into {targets:?}");
|
|
}
|
|
for e in c.edges() {
|
|
println!("{prefix} interior edge {e:?}");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn main() {
|
|
let bp = Blueprint::new(
|
|
vec![
|
|
BlueprintNode::Composite(sma_cross()),
|
|
BlueprintNode::from(aura_std::Exposure::new(0.5)),
|
|
],
|
|
vec![SourceSpec {
|
|
kind: ScalarKind::F64,
|
|
targets: vec![Target { node: 0, slot: 0 }],
|
|
}],
|
|
vec![Edge { from: 0, to: 1, slot: 0, from_field: 0 }],
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
println!("== Blueprint graph-as-data walk ==");
|
|
println!("sources: {}", bp.sources().len());
|
|
for (i, s) in bp.sources().iter().enumerate() {
|
|
println!(" source[{i}] kind={:?} -> {:?}", s.kind, s.targets);
|
|
}
|
|
println!("top-level items: {}", bp.nodes().len());
|
|
for n in bp.nodes() {
|
|
describe_node(" ", n);
|
|
}
|
|
println!("top-level edges: {}", bp.edges().len());
|
|
for e in bp.edges() {
|
|
println!(" edge {e:?}");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The walk must reach the interior of the composite purely through the
|
|
// public accessors — no engine internals.
|
|
let first = &bp.nodes()[0];
|
|
if let BlueprintNode::Composite(c) = first {
|
|
assert_eq!(c.name(), "sma_cross");
|
|
assert_eq!(c.nodes().len(), 3, "composite interior should have 3 items");
|
|
assert_eq!(c.input_roles().len(), 1, "one price role");
|
|
assert_eq!(c.input_roles()[0].len(), 2, "price fans into both SMAs");
|
|
let out = c.output();
|
|
assert_eq!((out.node, out.field), (2, 0), "Sub output is the port");
|
|
println!("OK: walked the composite interior via public accessors only.");
|
|
} else {
|
|
panic!("expected composite as first item");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|