docs(tdd): wire sibling skills to the new entry path

The tdd skill referenced its neighbours (implement, brainstorm,
debug) but none referenced it back. Close the loop so the new
executable-spec-first entry path is reachable and consistent from
every skill that describes a relationship it now belongs to:

- implement: mini-mode trigger + dispatch example now cover a
  RED-first handoff from `debug` OR `tdd` (was debug-only); the
  orchestrator's task template and Phase-3 skip note generalised.
  This was real drift — mini-mode is no longer debug-exclusive.
- planner: skip rule gains the `tdd` case (it skips brainstorm
  AND planner — the RED executable-spec is the plan).
- brainstorm: `tdd` added to the permitted-skip list as the
  profile-gated alternative entry path, plus a cross-ref marking
  brainstorm as the bounce-back target when behaviour stops being
  test-specifiable.
- boss: pipeline diagram, Step-3 routing prose, and cross-refs.
  A test-specifiable feature issue is dispatched to `tdd`
  autonomously, the same way a bug issue goes to `debug`; this is
  NOT a new-cycle bounce-back (the test is the spec). The
  bounce-back fires only reactively, when tdd surfaces a genuine
  design fork.
- debug: reciprocal sibling note + cross-ref (new behaviour is
  tdd's job; debug is for regressions of existing behaviour).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-01 16:56:56 +02:00
parent 873e6e8f88
commit 137ec21e26
6 changed files with 54 additions and 10 deletions
+4
View File
@@ -36,6 +36,10 @@ May be skipped when:
- The work is a bug fix where the RED test from `debug` IS
the plan (handoff goes straight to `implement` mini-mode).
- The work is a test-specifiable feature routed through `tdd`,
where the RED executable-spec IS the plan (handoff goes
straight to `implement` mini-mode). `tdd` skips both
`brainstorm` and `planner`.
- The work is a trivial mechanical edit (per the project's
CLAUDE.md "trivial mechanical edits" carve-out).