The `spec-skeptic` `scope-fork` juror reads only the seeding issue plus the spec. On the legitimate `specify` direct-entry path — a fork settled in a long in-context design discussion — that resolution lives only in ephemeral chat the juror cannot replay. When the issue body lags the discussion (still lists the fork open), the juror correctly blocks, and a design BLOCK escalates without self-correction. The result: auto-sign was structurally almost unreachable for the in-context entry path. Close the blind spot by giving the juror an auditable source instead of weakening the gate. When `specify` enters in-context and a tracker issue still lists a now-resolved fork as open, the orchestrator posts a reconciliation comment recording each fork's resolution WITH provenance (a record of the user's decision, never a fresh orchestrator one) before writing the spec. The comment is persistent and audit-able — unlike a carrier digest — so it, not the orchestrator's confidence, is what the juror checks. Separation of powers keeps it honest: the orchestrator writes the comment, the adversarial juror enforces the provenance requirement. A bare `decision: X` with no provenance does not resolve the fork — the re-dispatched juror blocks on it. The escalation rule and the three-field carrier are untouched; only the juror's information changes. Mechanics: - specify Step 1.5: reconciliation-comment sub-step, provenance format, issue-less fallback (auto-sign -> human sign-off, no weak spec-note). - spec-skeptic: replace the "quoted in the dispatch" drift; juror reads the issue WITH comments via `issue_tracker.show_cmd`; provenance check. - new profile slot `issue_tracker.show_cmd` (must render comments); documented in schema + template. - issue skill: `tea issues <idx>` is body-only; `--comments` required (verified against tea 0.14.1 and Aura #55 — 180 vs 144 lines). - consistency: design.md out-of-scope, README, pipeline.md, boss skill.
9.7 KiB
skills
A self-contained set of development-cycle skills and agents for
Claude Code. Originally distilled from the AILang project's
in-tree skills/ directory and generalised so it can carry the
same discipline across any project.
The plugin is mechanics: pipeline shape, hard-gates, TDD,
RED-first bug fixing, agent-template, working-tree-as-quarantine,
status protocol. It does not know your project's paths,
build commands, vocabulary, or domain-specific contracts. Those
live in a small per-project profile file
(.claude/dev-cycle-profile.yml) plus the project's CLAUDE.md.
What's in the box
The pipeline skills, each with the agents it primarily dispatches:
| Skill | Trigger | Output | Mandatory? |
|---|---|---|---|
brainstorm |
New cycle with an open design | ratified design handed to specify (writes no spec itself) |
Optional discovery front-end |
specify |
Design settled in sources, or handed over by brainstorm |
spec under the configured spec dir | Hard-gate before plan |
planner |
New iteration within an open cycle | plan under the configured plan dir | Hard-gate before implement |
implement |
Plan exists | code + tests, uncommitted in working tree | Standard iteration path |
audit |
Cycle closing OR baseline drift suspected | drift report + regression report | Mandatory at cycle close |
debug |
Bug observed | RED test in working tree + cause analysis | Mandatory RED-first for any bug |
tdd |
Test-specifiable feature / issue (third entry path, alongside brainstorm and specify) |
RED executable-spec in working tree → implement mini-mode |
Opt-in entry path; bounces to brainstorm on a design fork |
fieldtest |
Orchestrator-dispatched post-audit | example fixtures + friction spec | Per-cycle optional; milestone fieldtest is the closing gate for a surface-touching milestone |
docwriter |
API surface stable across N cycles | rustdoc / docstring sweep | Optional |
boss |
User types /boss |
autonomous-orchestrator session — dispatches the other skills until done-state or bounce-back; can optionally sign specs in the user's place (opt-in, see below) | User-invoked, never auto-dispatched |
Two further utility skills are invoked on demand rather than as
pipeline phases: issue (file or update a tracker item) and glossary
(build or maintain the project glossary — see docs/glossary-convention.md).
One conversational skill stands outside the pipeline entirely:
pseudo (typed /pseudo) switches replies into commented,
human-readable pseudocode for explaining code — each answer opens
with a source-file-and-line anchor, marks notable steps with
reference markers that are pointing handles for the user (not
footnotes — explanations stay inline at the code, never in a
legend below), sketches the layout of the data structures the
code touches alongside the
flow, reduces the irrelevant to stubs, and omits low-level
mechanics. The pseudocode leans on the source language's idiom
in a language-tagged fence so it renders with syntax
highlighting, and keeps comments sparse — on their own line and
only where the code is not self-explanatory. Prose is allowed
only in a supporting role — the pseudocode block stays the
centre of every answer. It dispatches no agents.
Vocabulary is configurable. A cycle is one round in the
pipeline graph; your project may call it a release, an epic,
or whatever fits, and its sub-unit (the default iteration) a
sprint or a story. A milestone is a distinct, higher
axis — a tracker container (Gitea/GitHub milestone, Linear
project) that spans potentially many cycles and closes only when
the work it promised is complete and functional (see
docs/pipeline.md § Milestone-close gate). A cycle close is a
loop step; it is never a milestone close.
The two-layer split
This repo (the plugin) carries everything that is universal:
- Pipeline form:
design → plan → execute → review → close - Hard-gates between phases
- TDD as an independent inner-loop discipline
- RED-first bug fixes
- Agent template (frontmatter / Iron Law / standing reading / process / status / output / rationalisations / red flags)
- Status protocol:
DONE / DONE_WITH_CONCERNS / PARTIAL / BLOCKED / NEEDS_CONTEXT - Working-tree-as-quarantine and only-orchestrator-commits
- main HEAD sacrosanct
- No nested subagent dispatch (Claude Code platform constraint; Opus 4.8 Workflows fan out at the top level but do not lift it)
- No orphan agents
Your project carries a small profile that fills the slots:
- Paths: spec dir, plan dir, design ledger, code roots, bench dir
- Commands: build, test, lint, regression scripts
- Vocabulary: cycle name, sub-cycle name, ledger-entry name
- Naming: counter prefix vs date prefix vs flat, slug shape
- Standing reading list: concrete files, per role
- Git: issue tracker kind, close marker, main-protection policy
- Pipeline customisations: which phases are mandatory, when optional ones fire
See docs/profile-schema.md for the full schema and
templates/project-profile.yml for a copy-and-fill starting point.
Keeping a profile current
Profile slots are versioned with the plugin, not with your project.
A new optional slot lands in docs/profile-schema.md and as a
commented-out block in templates/project-profile.yml — but an
existing profile does not gain it automatically. Every
consuming skill treats a missing optional slot as a documented
no-op, so an out-of-date profile never breaks; it just silently
skips whatever the new slot would have enabled.
That silence cuts both ways: a profile written before a slot
existed will quietly not run the gate the slot powers, and nothing
flags it. So after pulling a plugin update, skim the commented
blocks in templates/project-profile.yml and the matching sections
in docs/profile-schema.md; any optional section your profile
lacks is a candidate to retrofit. The slot reference lives with the
plugin, never in the project — when in doubt, the schema is the
source of truth.
Retrofitting spec_validation
The spec_validation.parsers slot maps a markdown fence label to
the tool that validates a spec code block of that kind. It powers
the parse gates that stop a spec from shipping code blocks that do
not parse against the live tool:
specifyStep 4 self-review — the parse-every-block gateplannerStep 5 self-review — the parse-the-bytes-you-inline gate- the
grounding-checkagent's code-block parse pass
A profile written before this slot existed has no spec_validation
section, so all three gates are silent no-ops there. To opt in, add
the section: map each fence label your specs use (a surface
language, a JSON-against-schema block, an IR block, …) to its
ext + cmd, where cmd carries the {file} placeholder and
exits non-zero on a parse failure. A fence label with no entry is
skipped and documented, never silently trusted. See
docs/profile-schema.md § spec_validation for the shape and
templates/project-profile.yml for a commented example.
Spec auto-sign (opt-in)
By default a specify dispatch in a /boss session pauses at its
user-review gate for the user's signature — the human approves every
spec before any plan is built. A project that wants /boss to run
unattended across spec boundaries can opt in with
pipeline.boss.spec_auto_sign: true.
With it on, the orchestrator may sign a spec in the user's place, but never on its own confidence. Signing requires two stages to clear:
- Objective gates — the precondition gate, the parse-every-block
gate, and a
grounding-checkPASSwith no human override. - A unanimous adversarial panel — the
spec-skepticagent dispatched five times in parallel, one per lens (criterion,grounding,scope-fork,ambiguity,plan-readiness), each trying to refute the spec. All five must returnSOUND.
A BLOCK is never signed over. The five lenses split by what a BLOCK
means: an editorial one (criterion, ambiguity, plan-readiness —
the spec is under-articulated) the orchestrator repairs in a bounded
loop (edit, re-run the objective gates, re-dispatch all five lenses, up
to 2 rounds); a design one (scope-fork, grounding — the ground is
not settled), an INFRA_ERROR, any objective gate not green, or an
exhausted budget falls back to the human sign-off pause the spec would
have hit anyway. Re-dispatching all five lenses every round is the
backstop that stops an editorial repair from quietly settling a design
question. When a fork was settled in-context but the seeding issue still
lists it open, specify records the resolution as a provenance-bearing
reconciliation comment on the issue (Step 1.5), which the scope-fork
juror reads via issue_tracker.show_cmd — closing the blind spot where
the in-context entry path could otherwise never clear that lens. On a
clean sign the orchestrator commits the spec
((boss-signed) in the subject), sends a mandatory informational notify
that names the signed capability and invites a veto, and continues to
planner without stopping. A later veto is a forward correction, never
a history rewind. See specify/SKILL.md Step 6,
specify/agents/spec-skeptic.md, and boss/SKILL.md §"Spec auto-sign".
Install
See INSTALL.md. In short: clone, run install.sh, then drop
a dev-cycle-profile.yml into each project that should use the
plugin.
Status
The migration from AILang's in-tree ~/dev/ailang/skills/ into
this plugin is complete — the pipeline skills, the specify and
tdd entry paths, the boss orchestrator, and the utility and
conversational skills documented above have all landed.
docs/migration.md records the repo-layout convention and the
per-skill and per-agent authoring checklists.