Files
Skills/postmortem/SKILL.md
T
Brummel daa7b49f8f feat(postmortem): add session-retrospective skill + aggregator
A new utility skill that grades a finished session on three axes —
cost & efficiency, toolchain health, agent effectiveness — from the
session's own Claude Code flight recorder (the JSONL transcript plus
one sidechain log per dispatched subagent).

The heavy lifting lives in scripts/postmortem.py, a stdlib-only,
read-only aggregator. It handles the two accounting traps the raw log
sets: usage is repeated per streamed assistant line under a shared
requestId (deduped max-per-field, then summed across requests), and
the transcript carries no costUSD/durationMs (both null) — so cost is
derived from tokens x an overridable list-price table and labelled an
estimate, wall-clock from timestamp deltas. Subagent spend is billed
separately from its own usage objects and graded by terminal status.

Single-session by design: defaults to the newest transcript in the
project's log dir (flagged active if still live), or --session <id>
for a finished run. Secret files are out of bounds in both the Iron
Law and the Red Flags.

Verified end-to-end against a real 15-subagent session.
2026-06-02 16:11:33 +02:00

8.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

name, description
name description
postmortem Use after a working session (or a `/boss` run) to grade how well the toolchain and the dispatched agents actually performed, and what the run cost. Reads the session's own Claude Code transcript + subagent logs, aggregates tokens/cost/tool-health deterministically via a helper script, and writes a scored retrospective. Utility skill, user-invoked or orchestrator-invoked at run close; never a pipeline gate.

postmortem — grade the run

Violating the letter of these rules is violating the spirit.

Overview

Every session leaves a detailed flight recorder behind — the JSONL transcript under ~/.claude/projects/<slug>/<session>.jsonl plus one sidechain log per dispatched subagent under <session>/subagents/. Nobody reads it. So the same expensive habits repeat: a subagent fleet that bounces BLOCKED, a tool loop with a 30% error rate, a cache-cold run that pays full input price on every turn. This skill turns that recorder into a graded retrospective: how well did the toolchain work, how effective were the agents, and what did it cost.

It is descriptive, not corrective. It produces a report and, where warranted, recommends filing tracker issues — it does not change code, baselines, or the pipeline.

When to Use / Skipping

Invoke:

  • After a substantial interactive session, when you want to know where the time and tokens went.
  • At the close of a /boss autonomous run, to grade the orchestrator's dispatch choices.
  • When a run felt expensive or thrashy and you want the numbers.

Not a pipeline phase. Never a hard-gate. It reads logs; it never blocks a cycle.

The Iron Law

NUMBERS COME FROM THE SCRIPT, NEVER FROM MEMORY OR EYEBALLING THE LOG
EVERY DOLLAR FIGURE IS LABELLED "ESTIMATE" — THE TRANSCRIPT CARRIES NO METERED COST
NEVER READ ~/.ionos_token, .credentials.json, OR ANY SECRET FILE INTO CONTEXT
A GRADE WITHOUT A CITED METRIC IS AN OPINION — DROP IT
DEDUP TOKEN USAGE BY requestId — THE SCRIPT DOES THIS; DO NOT RE-SUM THE RAW LOG BY HAND

What the data does and does not contain

Read before interpreting, so the report never overclaims:

  • Present: per-request usage (input / output / cache-creation / cache-read / server-tool counts), model, requestId, timestamps, every tool_use with its input, every tool_result with the authoritative is_error flag, skill invocations, slash commands, and a full separate transcript + agentType / description for each subagent.
  • Absent: costUSD is always null; durationMs is always null. Cost is derived from tokens × a list-price table; wall-clock is derived from timestamp deltas. Both are estimates and the report says so.

The streamed transcript repeats the same requestId across several assistant lines with an identical usage object. The helper script dedups per requestId; never sum the raw lines.

The Process

Step 1 — Run the aggregator

python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/postmortem.py [--session <id>] [--cwd <project>]

Defaults to the newest transcript in the current project's log dir — i.e. the session you are in (it will be flagged active, meaning totals are partial). To grade a finished run, pass its --session <uuid>. Override prices for a non-default plan with --pricing '<json>' or the POSTMORTEM_PRICING env var (same shape as DEFAULT_PRICING in the script).

The script emits one JSON object on stdout. That JSON — not the raw log — is your evidence base.

Step 2 — Read the JSON and grade three axes

Grade each axis on the cited numbers. A grade with no number behind it is an opinion; drop it.

  1. Cost & efficiencytotals.cost_usd (estimate), main-vs-subagent split, cache_hit_ratio (the dominant lever: below ~0.7 on a long session means cache-cold turns paying full input price), output-token share, server_tools (paid web_search / web_fetch).
  2. Toolchain healthtools.error_ratio and interrupted (the authoritative is_error signal), the tool mix (a Read / Edit / Bash imbalance hints at thrashing or re-reading), slash_commands such as /compact (context pressure).
  3. Agent effectiveness — per subagent: terminal_status (DONE / DONE_WITH_CONCERNS / PARTIAL / BLOCKED / NEEDS_CONTEXT / unknown), cost_usd, and requests. A fleet that cost real tokens to return BLOCKED is the headline finding. Compare subagent spend to what they delivered.

Step 3 — Write the report

Write a Markdown report to the configured destination (see Output destination). Structure it as Output format below. Lead with the scorecard, support every grade with a number from the JSON, and keep the prose tight — this is a retrospective, not a transcript replay.

Step 4 — Surface, don't fix

Translate the sharpest findings into recommendations. Where a finding is a concrete, trackable defect (a subagent that reliably bounces BLOCKED, a tool loop with a runaway error rate), recommend filing it via the issue skill — name it, but do not file it yourself unless the user asks. This skill ends at the report.

Output destination

Resolve in this order:

  1. --out <path> if the invoker passed one.
  2. The project profile's paths.postmortem_dir (if a .claude/dev-cycle-profile.yml exists and defines it).
  3. Default: docs/postmortems/<session-id-short>-<yyyy-mm-dd>.md under the project root, creating the directory if needed.

Also print a ≤200-word summary to the chat so the headline grade and cost are visible without opening the file.

Output format

# Post-mortem — <session-id-short> (<date>)

**Scorecard**
| Axis | Grade | Headline metric |
|------|-------|-----------------|
| Cost & efficiency | AF | $<est> total, cache hit <ratio> |
| Toolchain health  | AF | <error_ratio>, <n> interrupts |
| Agent effectiveness | AF | <k>/<n> agents DONE, $<est> on subagents |

**Cost** (ESTIMATE — derived from tokens × list price, not metered)
<main vs subagent split; token breakdown; the one number that
dominates the bill and why>

**Toolchain**
<tool mix, error ratio + what the errors were, context-pressure
signals like /compact>

**Agents**
<per-subagent line: type — status — $est — one-clause verdict.
Omit if no subagents were dispatched.>

**Recommendations**
<≤5 bullets. Each ties to a cited metric. Mark any that warrant
an `issue`.>

_Pricing basis: <pricing_basis from the JSON>. Wall-clock and
cost are derived, not metered._

If the session is flagged active, add one line at the top: "⚠️ Session still active — figures are partial."

Common Rationalisations

Excuse Reality
"I'll just skim the transcript and estimate the cost" The transcript has no cost field and repeats usage per streamed line. Hand-summing is wrong twice over. Run the script.
"$31 is the cost" It is an estimate from list prices. The plan may differ; the basis line and the ESTIMATE label are non-optional.
"Cache hit ratio of 0.5 is fine" On a long session it means half the input was re-sent at full price. That is the single biggest lever — grade it.
"All agents returned, so effectiveness is an A" "Returned" ≠ "succeeded". A BLOCKED agent that burned $2 is a failure that cost money. Read terminal_status.
"Let me also peek at the IONOS token to check the endpoint" Never. Secret files are out of bounds — see the Iron Law and the user's global rules.
"I found a broken agent, I'll fix its prompt now" Out of scope. This skill reports and recommends; the fix is a separate, tracked change.

Red Flags — STOP

  • Quoting any token or dollar number that did not come out of the script's JSON.
  • Presenting a derived dollar figure without the ESTIMATE label and pricing basis.
  • Reading any file under ~/.claude other than the session transcript and its subagent logs — and never any credential or token file.
  • Editing code, baselines, or pipeline config "while you're in there". Report only.
  • Grading an axis with adjectives instead of the cited metric.

Cross-references

  • Helper script: scripts/postmortem.py — the deterministic aggregator. All numbers originate here.
  • Hand-off target: the issue skill, when a finding is a trackable defect worth filing.
  • Profile slot (optional): paths.postmortem_dir for the report destination; POSTMORTEM_PRICING to override the price table for a non-default plan.
  • Data-source note: this skill reads only the current session's own transcript and subagent logs. It does not crawl other projects or other sessions (single-session by design).