fe0ad9d739
An issue or decision-log entry must state the situation, not the orchestration loop's next move. "Next step: enter `specify`" — and its role-periphrasis "hand it off to the spec writer next", which names no skill — is Claude-Code session control-flow, meaningless to a tracker reader who is not the loop. A distinct defect class from rule 4 reachability, and not curable by declarative phrasing: the content is harness-native. issue rule 1 retitled "No direct address" -> "Impersonal and tool-neutral". The discriminator is status vs. dispatch, name-independent (describes the work's condition -> keep; directs who runs what next -> cut), and rule 1 now also bars first-person loop narration. boss § The reference issue gains "Record the decision, not the dispatch". Triple- encoded in both skills (rule/mechanic + table/rationalisation + red-flag). Future-only; existing entries are not edited.