Per-skill prose tightening from the same audit swarm; each finding passed an adversarial second reviewer. No behavioural change. - audit: drop garbled "Conventions require deferred audits to compound" sentence (says the opposite of intent; the preceding line already closes the loophole). - brainstorm: drop forward-pointing meta-comment about the Rationalisations table. - debug: drop third restatement that debugger.md is the single source for the carrier/handoff fields. - docwriter: drop motivational opener; Overview starts at the waste argument. - fieldtest: fold the 2-4-examples rationale into the dispatch sentence instead of restating the count a fourth time. - implement: drop "known platform constraint at the time" aside. - planner: cut the verbose anti-drift paragraph (which restated the very table it claimed not to) down to a cross-reference. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.5 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| audit | Use at cycle close OR when baseline drift is suspected. Runs architect drift review against the design ledger plus the configured regression scripts. Mandatory at every cycle close; deferral requires an explicit backlog issue naming the reason and the re-run date. |
audit — cycle-close tidy
Violating the letter of these rules is violating the spirit.
Overview
Without a scheduled clean-up step, codebases grow by accretion: every iteration adds, none tear out, and deferred drift compounds across cycles. This skill is the cleanup step. It runs after the last iteration of a cycle closes and before the next cycle starts.
When to Use / Skipping
Mandatory at every cycle close. Skipping requires an
explicit backlog issue (issue tracker configured under
git.issue_tracker) naming:
- the blocking sibling cycle (if any),
- the reason for deferral,
- the date the audit will be re-run.
"We want to keep moving" is not a valid reason.
Also triggered manually when baseline drift is suspected outside a cycle close (e.g. the bencher reports an unexplained metric shift).
The Iron Law
TIDY IS NON-OPTIONAL AT CYCLE CLOSE
REGRESSION-SCRIPT EXIT CODE 2 = FIX INFRASTRUCTURE FIRST, NEVER REPORT AS REGRESSION
NO BASELINE UPDATE WITHOUT A PAIRED RATIFY STATEMENT IN THE AUDIT COMMIT BODY
The Process
Step 1 — Architect drift review
Dispatch architect with the cycle scope (commit range from
the previous cycle-close to HEAD):
For cycle <X>: read the project's design ledger (configured
under paths.design_ledger), walk its contracts;
`git log <prev-close>..HEAD --format=full` for the cycle's
iter and audit commit bodies; `git diff <prev-close>..HEAD`
for the diff; report drift.
Architect produces a prioritised drift list (see
agents/architect.md output format).
Step 2 — Regression check
Run the scripts configured under commands.regression in the
project profile, in order. If the list is empty, the project
has no regression gate and this step is a no-op (architect
remains the gate).
The exit code of each script is the gate:
| Exit | Classification | Action |
|---|---|---|
0 |
Green | All metrics within tolerance vs. the script's baseline. The cycle's drift gate is clear (drift-clean, not a milestone close — see ../docs/pipeline.md § Milestone-close gate). |
1 |
Drift / regression | At least one metric regressed past tolerance. Treat like a drift item. |
2 |
Infrastructure failure | Script-output format changed, fixture missing, or harness can't spawn. Fix the infrastructure FIRST, re-run. Never claim a regression on exit 2. |
A non-zero exit on any script in the list triggers the bencher
(agents/bencher.md) for hypothesis-driven diagnostics if the
regression needs localising.
Step 3 — Classify and report
Combine architect drift items + regression results into one report to the orchestrator. Each item is one of:
- fix (specific iter scoped, plan + implement)
- ratify (
--update-baselineon the firing script + an explicit ratify statement in the audit commit body naming the iter that intentionally moved the metric and why) - carry-on (architect found nothing actionable, regression green)
Step 4 — Resolve
The orchestrator picks per item:
- fix path: dispatch
planner+implementfor a tidy iteration. The implement skill leaves the fix in the working tree; the orchestrator commits per the iter's pattern (suggested subject:iter <X>.tidy: <fix>). - ratify path: run
--update-baseline(or the equivalent) on the firing script. The audit-close commit carries both the updated baseline and a ratify paragraph in its body naming the iter that moved the metric and the substantive reason (semantic cost, intentional trade-off). - carry-on path: the audit-close commit body says
cycle <X> tidy (clean)and ratifies whatever the regression check drove. Herecleanmeans drift-clean — the cycle's code matches the ledger; it is not a milestone close, which additionally requires a green milestone fieldtest (see../docs/pipeline.md§ Milestone-close gate). Audit commits always exist at cycle close — they carry the architect findings, the regression numbers, and the resolution.
Handoff Contract
audit hands to the orchestrator:
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
drift_items |
prioritised list (path + 1-line justification) from architect |
regression_results |
per script: exit code + raw output verbatim (no rounding, no summarisation — the orchestrator second-guesses with the full numbers) |
recommendation |
per-item: fix / ratify / carry-on |
The orchestrator decides the per-item outcome; audit does
not self-resolve.
Common Rationalisations
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Tidy can wait until next week, let's keep moving" | The project's CLAUDE.md is explicit: tidy at cycle close is non-optional. Deferral compounds; next cycle adds its own drift. |
| "Regression red, just bump the baseline, the regression is expected" | "Expected" is exactly the claim that needs evidence. Localise the regression, then either fix OR ratify with a paragraph in the audit commit body naming the iter and reason. |
| "Drift item is trivial, ignore it" | Trivial drift left open trains future-orchestrator to treat the architect's findings as advisory. Six items in, six items out. |
| "Regression scripts are hanging, skip them this cycle" | Exit code 2 = fix infrastructure FIRST. No skipping. |
| "Architect report is empty, fast-close" | Empty report is a possible outcome. Run the regression scripts anyway. Both gates must pass. |
Red Flags — STOP
- Skipping any configured regression script
- Bumping baseline without a paired ratify statement in the audit commit body
- Treating exit code 2 as a regression to fix
- Closing a cycle with drift items in
pendingstate - "We'll re-run after the holidays" without a dated backlog issue
- Declaring a milestone closeable on the strength of an
audit-clean while the milestone fieldtest has not run green —
audit proves drift-clean, never functional (see
../docs/pipeline.md§ Milestone-close gate)
Cross-references
- Agents dispatched:
agents/architect.md— drift review against the design ledgeragents/bencher.md— hypothesis-driven regression diagnostics when a metric needs localising
- Hand-off target: the orchestrator, or
../planner+../implementfor a tidy iteration.