WhatsNew: iteration-discipline-revert closed — done-state entry
Mirrors the done-state notify text verbatim (user-facing changelog, no internals). The iteration-discipline-revert milestone is fully closed (brainstorm → planner → implement → audit, clean); next move surfaced is the effect-handler-infrastructure milestone.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -176,3 +176,7 @@ This is the first step on a longer arc. The motivation is real-world streaming c
|
||||
A safety guard added at the same time: a lambda whose body refers to a mutable cell from an enclosing block is rejected by the type checker with a clear diagnostic, since cells are tied to their block's lifetime and cannot be lifted into a heap-stored closure without further design work.
|
||||
|
||||
All tests green. Benchmark scripts all pass at the (updated for this milestone) baselines.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-16 — Experimental iteration redesign fully reverted
|
||||
|
||||
The experimental iteration redesign is fully reverted. It had added named loops, compiler-checked-terminating recursion, and a non-termination effect — all removed; the language's iteration story is back exactly to plain recursion, nothing new to learn. It was pulled because it had grown from a small documentation gap into a sweeping language-identity change, then hit a wall where it would have made a very natural kind of function impossible to write, and the only escape weakened a core correctness guarantee you co-designed. Backed out cleanly: program behaviour verified byte-identical to the pre-change state, full test suite green, benchmarks clean (one metric flagged as pre-existing machine drift, not caused by this — filed separately). The honest one-paragraph documentation note the original gap actually needed is now in place; the genuine total-recursion ambition is preserved on the roadmap, sequenced behind the type-system work it really needs. Your streaming example was never part of this and is untouched. Its next step is the effect-handler foundation — the heaviest building block, with open design questions I'd rather shape with you than decide solo while you're away. That's the natural place to pick up.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user