05c3c018def048aab215d9c1b2a3669531bc8f20
The Float-aware `NoInstance` addendum emitted the same hint for every Eq/Ord method at Float: "use float_eq / float_lt (and siblings ...)". For `eq`/`ne`/`lt`/`le`/`gt`/`ge` that is correct — each has a drop-in boolean `float_*` sibling. For `compare` it is incomplete and misleading: `compare` returns three-way `Ordering`, but no `float_compare` ships (a deliberate non-ship, docs/specs/2026-05-20-operator-routing-eq-ord.md). An LLM author who reached for `compare` to get three-way ordering was pointed at boolean siblings as if a drop-in existed, and left guessing whether to reconstruct it themselves. Fix: branch the addendum on the called method. The boolean arm keeps the existing wording; the `compare` arm instead names the deliberate `float_compare` omission and points at building a three-way `Ordering` from `float_lt` + `float_eq`. One added branch on the existing `method` field (already carried by `CheckError::NoInstance`), no new machinery; the structured `ctx` is untouched. Out of scope (the issue's deliberate non-ship): shipping a `float_compare` fn. The friction was that the diagnostic did not acknowledge the omission — now it does. RED-first, inline: a one-branch diagnostic-text change at a single site whose surrounding code was already loaded while working the adjacent #52 fix this session (CLAUDE.md "context already loaded" carve-out). TDD discipline preserved by the new RED test `compare_at_float_names_deliberate_no_float_compare` over a new minimal fixture `examples/compare_float_noinstance.ail` (`compare` at Float); it failed RED on the old shared wording and passes GREEN on the branch. The pre-existing `eq_at_float_fires_float_aware_noinstance` still passes (eq arm unchanged). Verification: full ailang-check lib suite (121) + full ail test suite green; live CLI renders both arms correctly. closes #25
Description
No description provided
Languages
Rust
91.6%
Python
4.6%
C
1.8%
LLVM
1.6%
Shell
0.4%