Brummel 50dc478ca5 spec: boehm-retirement — drop the transitional Boehm GC path
Resolves Gitea #4. Approach A (atomic single iteration). Six layers
in one cohesive cut: CLI `--alloc=gc` arm removed; codegen
`AllocStrategy::Gc` variant deleted with the default flipped to
`Rc`; libgc link branch removed; ~3 pure-differential e2e tests
plus the `gc_stress.ail` fixture deleted; ~9 RC-feature tests that
used GC-stdout as backstop lose only the differential assertion
(absolute fixed-stdout pin retained); M2 staticlib alloc-guard
drops its gc-arm (bump-arm preserved); design/models/rc-uniqueness
excises the Boehm-parity-oracle narrative; pipeline.md drops the
libgc pipeline-diagram arm; docs_honesty_pin flips from
Boehm-present-tense anchor to four absence-pins against
Boehm-zombie strings.

Three design forks were resolved with the user via brainstorm Q&A:

  (1) bump survives as bench-floor — `AllocStrategy::Bump`, the
      `--alloc=bump` CLI flag, and `runtime/bump.c` all stay; the
      enum keeps two variants (Rc, Bump); the codegen
      negative-complement test retargets from `AllocStrategy::Gc`
      to `AllocStrategy::Bump`. Bump's standing role is the
      raw-alloc bench-floor for RC-overhead measurement, not a
      production target.
  (2) the ~12 RC-vs-GC differential e2e tests are NOT all deleted
      wholesale — pure-differential ones (test name literally
      `*_matches_gc_*` or `*_same_stdout_as_gc`) are deleted; the
      RC-feature tests with GC as backstop keep their absolute
      stdout pin (`assert_eq!(stdout_rc.trim(), "<n>")`) and only
      lose the differential assertion. This nuance was added at
      spec time on top of the user's "delete the differential
      pattern" answer, because the differential was incidental to
      tests like `rc_box_drop` / `rc_list_drop_borrow` that pin
      drop-fn correctness under RC and would lose unrelated
      coverage if deleted entirely.
  (3) the 1.3× RC-over-bump number is retained in
      design/models/rc-uniqueness.md but reframed as a
      bench-health regression gate (not a Boehm-retirement gate);
      the closure-chain ±15% wider band is preserved analogously.

Grounding-check (ailang-grounding-check) PASS — 7 load-bearing
assumptions ratified, all spec-named paths and line numbers
verified (±2 lines), all proposed-for-removal strings present at
the spec-named locations. Assumption #7 (codegen default
currently Gc) is structurally self-evident: removing the variant
forces the default onto a surviving one by construction.

Out of scope, tracked separately:
  - Gitea #3 "Closure-pair slab / pool" — would tighten the
    closure-chain ±15% band; not blocked by retirement.
  - Any further `AllocStrategy::Bump` rework — still a
    single-variant bench instrument.

refs #4
2026-05-20 20:02:32 +02:00
S
Description
No description provided
26 MiB
Languages
Rust 91.6%
Python 4.6%
C 1.8%
LLVM 1.6%
Shell 0.4%