Files
AILang/docs/journals/2026-05-16-iter-effect-doc-honesty.md
T
Brummel a29700cc9e iter effect-doc-honesty: make the effect-system documentation true
Standalone documentation-honesty tidy (no language/checker/codegen
change; `ail check`/`run` byte-unchanged by construction). Corrects
three false effect-system claims the effect-subsystem recon surfaced,
plus two satellite mentions, guarded by a new doc-presence pin:

- DESIGN.md Decision 3: removed the "row-polymorphic (`![IO | r]`)"
  claim (no EffectRow / row variable exists in any crate — effect
  sets are a flat, unordered, closed set unified by set-equality);
  reconciled "`IO` and `Diverge` are wired up" to IO-only +
  `Diverge` reserved/unimplemented (zero code in any crate),
  modelled on Decision 4's reserved-refinements precedent.
- DESIGN.md "What is not (yet) supported": "IO and Diverge ops"
  bullet -> IO-only + Diverge-reserved.
- ast.rs Term::Do doc-comment: "resolved against the effect-handler
  table at link time" -> the real mechanism (typecheck lookup in
  Env::effect_ops + literal lower_effect_op codegen match; no
  handler table, no link-time resolution).
- form_a.md:226 + rule 3, and main.rs merge-prose CONTRACT example:
  Diverge mentions reconciled in lockstep.
- new crates/ailang-core/tests/effect_doc_honesty_pin.rs: 4 tests,
  fiction-absent + corrected-anchor-present, single-line wrap-robust
  substrings.

cargo test --workspace 600 -> 604 (4 new pin tests, 0 regressions);
design_schema_drift / spec_drift / schema_coverage stay green,
empirically confirming none scans the effect-prose region.
2026-05-16 13:25:49 +02:00

82 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown

# iter effect-doc-honesty — effect-system documentation-honesty tidy
**Date:** 2026-05-16
**Started from:** c41e0e5a9e48fd0099eda8c286f10ec7a30e8e8a
**Status:** DONE
**Tasks completed:** 6 of 6
## Summary
Documentation-honesty tidy: corrected three false effect-system
claims plus their two satellite mentions across the project docs,
guarded by one new doc-presence regression pin. No language,
checker, or codegen code changed — only a doc-comment, two markdown
spec files, an internal CLI guidance string, and a new integration
test. `ail check`/`ail run` behaviour is byte-unchanged by
construction; `cargo test --workspace` 600 → 604 (the four new pin
tests, zero regressions), `cargo build --workspace` clean. The
three sentinel drift/coverage tests (`design_schema_drift`,
`spec_drift`, `schema_coverage`) stay green, empirically confirming
none scans the effect-prose region.
## Per-task notes
- iter effect-doc-honesty.1: new pin `crates/ailang-core/tests/effect_doc_honesty_pin.rs`
(4 tests asserting fiction strings absent + corrected anchors
present across the 4 edited files); authored first, ran RED 0/4
for the right reason (TDD: RED before corrections).
- iter effect-doc-honesty.2: `docs/DESIGN.md` Decision 3 row-polymorphic
block → flat/unordered/closed set-equality + Diverge-reserved
wording; line-2722 "IO and Diverge ops" bullet → IO-only +
Diverge-reserved bullet. `design_md_effect_prose_is_true` GREEN.
- iter effect-doc-honesty.3: `crates/ailang-core/src/ast.rs` `Term::Do`
doc-comment effect-handler-table-at-link-time fiction → real
mechanism (typecheck against `Env::effect_ops`, `lower_effect_op`
literal-match codegen). `term_do_doc_comment_is_true` GREEN.
- iter effect-doc-honesty.4: `crates/ailang-core/specs/form_a.md`
line-226 "currently `IO` and `Diverge`" → IO-built-in-op /
Diverge-reserved; rule-3 "`Diverge` for `diverge/*`" →
io/print_str-is-the-only-built-in-op. `form_a_spec_effect_names_are_true`
GREEN.
- iter effect-doc-honesty.5: `crates/ail/src/main.rs` merge-prose
CONTRACT effect-annotation bullet dropped the non-existent
`(effects Diverge)` example. Whole pin 4/4 GREEN.
- iter effect-doc-honesty.6: full verification — whole pin 4/4,
`cargo test --workspace` 604/0 (600 prior + 4), drift/coverage
trio green, `cargo build --workspace` clean.
## Concerns
- Task 2: the plan's verbatim Task-2 replacement body soft-wrapped
the phrase "flat, unordered,\nclosed set of effect names"
mid-phrase, which contradicts Task-1's single-line pin substring
`"flat, unordered, closed set of effect names"` AND the plan's
own self-review item 6 ("every pin substring is single-line — the
documented iter-revert grep-wrap failure mode is avoided"). The
two authoritative artefacts (exact replacement text vs. exact
pin) could not both be applied verbatim. Resolved by preserving
the exact corrected *wording* (byte-identical to the plan's
intent) and the exact pin (Task 1, unchanged), moving only the
soft-wrap column so the asserted phrase stays contiguous on one
line. No wording added/dropped/changed. This is a planner
self-review-item-3 cross-check gap (the asserted-substring vs.
replacement-body check did not account for the replacement body's
own line wrap) — orchestrator may want to tighten the planner's
pin/replacement-body wrap cross-check.
## Known debt
- (none) — the tidy is self-contained; no deferred follow-up.
## Files touched
- `crates/ailang-core/tests/effect_doc_honesty_pin.rs` (new — the pin)
- `docs/DESIGN.md` (Decision 3 + "What is not supported" bullet)
- `crates/ailang-core/src/ast.rs` (`Term::Do` doc-comment)
- `crates/ailang-core/specs/form_a.md` (line 226 + rule 3)
- `crates/ail/src/main.rs` (merge-prose CONTRACT string)
## Stats
bench/orchestrator-stats/2026-05-16-iter-effect-doc-honesty.json