Brummel
69e738d6e6
Verifying the previous commit's surface-syntax fix with `ail parse` (the whitepaper's code blocks are unfenced/untagged, so no spec validation ever parsed them) surfaced a fourth, pre-existing drift the line-by-line signature fix had missed: the §sma_demo `(module …)` was short one closing paren and never balanced — it could not have parsed as written, independent of the mode/con-wrapper drift. Added the missing `)`. With it, both worked-example modules now parse clean: - §sma_demo → `ail parse` ok (4.4 KB JSON) - §series → `ail parse` ok `ail parse` resolves no names, so this verifies surface syntax only, which is the intended scope. The §series listing still leans on kernel-tier polymorphism that `ail check` rejects today; its full compile-verification stays with the pending Series milestone per spec 0059, exactly as the prior commit stated.