Brummel
7d086e69ce
Brainstorm output. Single-iteration milestone: rename the two camelCase JSON tags on `Term::Lam` — the only camelCase outliers in the AST schema — to kebab-case, matching the convention every other compound-key tag (`reuse-as`, etc.) already follows. Scope is verified-tiny: ast.rs (2 serde-rename strings) + workspace.rs in-source test JSON-literal + 2 `.ail.json` fixtures. None of the five hash-pinned `.ail` modules contains a lambda, so the milestone refreshes zero hash pins. Form-A is untouched — the surface uses `(params (typed ...))` / `(ret ...)`, never the camelCase tags. Feature-acceptance gate: passes weakly-but-honestly. Clause 1 is indirect (schema-internal consistency reduces the LLM author's "compound-tag-is-kebab" generalisation failure rate); there is no empirical preference measurement for this axis. Clause 2 holds (one fewer special case to memorise). Clause 3 vacuous (no semantic surface touched). Grounding-check (Step 7.5) PASS: all four load-bearing claims ratified by currently-green tests — round_trip.rs (Form-A invariance), hash_pin.rs (no lambda in pinned modules), workspace.rs in-source ct1_validator test (exhaustive call-site list), design_schema_drift.rs (kebab convention pin). Not bundled with #27 (arith-rename) per the spec preamble: #27 carries its own four open brainstorm questions and is a separate milestone; each gets one re-pin wave with its own rationale, no churn savings from bundling.