Brummel a5540c5620 workflow: retire milestone label — Gitea milestone container IS the concept
The `milestone` label was a dead duplicate of Gitea's first-class
milestone container. Zero issues carried it (the three actual
big-chunks — Flat array, Iteration-totality, Stateful islands —
live as Gitea milestone containers, not as labelled issues).
Same pattern as `prio:p1`: a slot that never gets used because
the concept it tries to label lives somewhere else.

Label deleted in Gitea. Remaining labels: `feature`, `idea`,
`in-progress` (three, all semantic, no taxonomy noise). Big-
chunk work continues to live as Gitea milestone containers
(reached via `tea milestones ls --repo Brummel/AILang`).

In-tree changes:

- CLAUDE.md: Gitea-issues bullet describes the three-label
  shape; explicit note that milestone is a Gitea container,
  not a label.
- skills/boss/SKILL.md: Step 1 filter set drops `milestone`,
  adds `tea milestones ls` for the container view; direction-
  freedom "new milestone" trigger reworded around the
  container, not the label.
- skills/brainstorm/SKILL.md: Step 7.5 tea-create template
  drops `milestone` from the choice set; adds a note that
  spec-needing deferred work should be filed as a Gitea
  milestone container via `tea milestones create` instead.

Verification: cargo test --workspace 647/0/2, architect_sweeps
exit 0, zero residual `milestone`-as-label refs in live docs
(grep skip-listed legitimate "Gitea milestone (container)"
prose).
2026-05-20 15:24:26 +02:00
S
Description
No description provided
26 MiB
Languages
Rust 91.6%
Python 4.6%
C 1.8%
LLVM 1.6%
Shell 0.4%