Brummel
c41e0e5a9e
The effect-op-arg-modes brainstorm spec bundled a real, self-contained DESIGN.md honesty fix with speculative build-ahead infra (an EffectOpSig arg-mode field whose only consumer was a synthetic test op). Recon had already destroyed the "effect-handler infrastructure" premise: the effect raise/declare/subset/propagation machinery is fully generic over any effect string; the only real prerequisite was one struct field, not a milestone. The user rejected the bundle as incoherent and the build-ahead half as the iteration-discipline trap repeated. - Retire the uncommitted effect-op-arg-modes spec (deleted from the working tree; never committed). - roadmap: drop the false "sub-ms-2 = effect-handler infrastructure" framing; mark Stateful-islands sub-milestone sequencing as UNDER RE-THINK with the user (no !Mut planning until that conversation); add the split-out effect-doc-honesty as an in-flight P2 [~] todo. - plan docs/plans/2026-05-16-effect-doc-honesty.md: placeholder-free tidy plan (the three DESIGN.md fictions + form_a.md + main.rs + a new doc-presence pin) over recon-mapped exact byte sites. - brainstorm SKILL: specs and design talk LEAD with the AILang (.ail) program that should work (= the feature-acceptance clause-1 evidence); the Rust implementation shape is secondary, never a substitute; a no-surface infra milestone still shows concrete .ail (often a must-fail fixture). Codifies user feedback from this session.