f10a77e8e5
The 18-arc validated the RC pipeline end-to-end; the orchestrator's call (JOURNAL 2026-05-08) was to keep Boehm as default and RC as the ready alternative rather than retire Boehm. Decision 9's 'transitional Boehm' framing was wrong shape for that policy — this edit re-casts it as 'dual allocator: Boehm GC for general workloads, RC for real-time-sensitive workloads', preserving the rest of the section. Decision 10 holds as the specification of the RC alternative; this edit only changes the framing of how the two allocators relate.