Brummel f10a77e8e5 DESIGN: re-frame Decision 9 as dual-allocator (not transitional)
The 18-arc validated the RC pipeline end-to-end; the orchestrator's
call (JOURNAL 2026-05-08) was to keep Boehm as default and RC as
the ready alternative rather than retire Boehm. Decision 9's
'transitional Boehm' framing was wrong shape for that policy —
this edit re-casts it as 'dual allocator: Boehm GC for general
workloads, RC for real-time-sensitive workloads', preserving the
rest of the section.

Decision 10 holds as the specification of the RC alternative; this
edit only changes the framing of how the two allocators relate.
2026-05-08 15:16:05 +02:00
S
Description
No description provided
26 MiB
Languages
Rust 91.6%
Python 4.6%
C 1.8%
LLVM 1.6%
Shell 0.4%