Files
Aura/docs/project-layout.md
T
Brummel 691562494b docs: fieldtest F3/F6 doc-gap fixes — manifest provenance in glossary, Aura.toml scaffold reality
Two doc-tightenings from the green milestone fieldtest (F3, F6 in
fieldtests/milestone-project-environment/FINDINGS.md): the glossary
manifest entry now names the topology hash and the project provenance
block {namespace, dylib_sha256, commit} a project-hosted run carries;
project-layout.md's Aura.toml annotation now matches what the scaffold
actually emits today ([paths] runs only — the data archive root joins
once real data enters).

refs #180
2026-07-02 22:24:02 +02:00

145 lines
8.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# How aura is used — engine, projects, and a day in the life
This document describes the *outside* of aura: how you sit in front of it and
what a research session looks like. The *inside* (the engine's contracts) is the
design ledger (`docs/design/INDEX.md`).
## Engine vs. project (the game-engine split)
aura is a **game engine for traders**, and like any game engine it is separate
from the things built with it:
- **This repo (`aura`)** is the **engine**: `aura-core` (the shared contract),
`aura-std` (universal standard nodes), `aura-engine` (the deterministic sim
runtime), `aura-cli` (the `aura` binary), and later the egui playground. It
ships at most `examples/` fixture nodes for its own tests — never your real
signals.
- **A research project** is its **own external repo** (e.g. `~/dev/ger40-lab/`),
with its own git history, its own Gitea repo (its own forward-queue), and a
cargo dependency on aura. **It is itself a Rust crate** (a `cdylib` library of
node / strategy / experiment blueprints); the `aura` host loads and runs it
during research (hot-reload), and freezes a chosen strategy + broker into a
standalone binary for deploy. This is where you and Claude author signals *and
experiments* — all in Rust — and where the runs live. (Contracts **C16**, **C20**.)
The `aura` CLI is a tool you run *inside* a project directory — it finds the
project root by walking up to an `Aura.toml`, the way `cargo` finds `Cargo.toml`.
A project is always a Rust program built on the engine.
## A project repo
```
ger40-lab/ # your research project — a separate Rust crate (cdylib)
├── Aura.toml # STATIC context only, paths only: the runs dir (all
│ # the scaffold emits today), plus a data archive root
│ # once real data enters; no logic — instrument
│ # geometry is the recorded sidecar (C15), never
│ # authored here
├── Cargo.toml # cdylib; depends on aura-core/aura-std (+ shared node crates);
│ # carries an empty [workspace] table (see note below)
├── CLAUDE.md # the project's own skills wiring (authoring discipline)
├── .claude/dev-cycle-profile.yml
├── nodes/ # project-local node & strategy blueprints (Rust)
│ └── third-candle-long/
├── experiments/ # experiment/harness definitions (Rust): matrices, sweeps
├── runs/ # the run registry: manifest + metrics per run
└── (frozen bots, …)
```
> **The empty `[workspace]` table.** A project crate is its own cargo workspace,
> never a member of the engine's. This matters the moment a project lives *under*
> the engine repo (common while authoring, before it moves to its own repo):
> cargo otherwise walks up, finds the engine's root manifest, and refuses to
> build —
>
> ```
> error: current package believes it's in a workspace when it's not:
> ... to keep it out of the workspace, add an empty [workspace] table ...
> ```
>
> The fix is cargo's own hint: an empty `[workspace]` table in the project's
> `Cargo.toml`. It pins the crate as a standalone workspace root and costs
> nothing when the project later sits in its own repo. The `aura new`
> scaffolder emits this line (cycle 0103); a hand-rolled project adds it
> itself.
## Where reusable nodes live (three tiers)
Everything that plugs into the engine is fractally a `Node`. Reuse is plain
cargo, layered by maturity (contract C16):
1. **`aura-std`** — universal blocks shipped with the engine (SMA/ATR/RSI,
resamplers, the `SessionNode`, standard combinators, broker profiles).
2. **Shared node crates** — cross-project-reusable blocks in their own repos
(e.g. `Brummel/aura-nodes-fx`), pulled in as cargo git dependencies.
3. **Project-local `nodes/`** — experimental, project-specific blocks.
Promotion is the ordinary Rust gradient: a node proves itself project-local →
gets extracted into a shared crate → if it turns universal, into `aura-std`.
Shared nodes are `rlib` dependencies; the hot-reload unit stays the project-side
`cdylib` that composes them, so editing a shared node still rebuilds and reloads
the dependent.
## Authoring happens in Claude Code (contract C17)
aura has no built-in coding-LLM. You author by talking to Claude Code, which
writes the Rust — nodes, strategies, *and experiments* — builds it, runs it, and
reports back. Declarative config (`Aura.toml`) holds only static context, never
logic. IONOS LLMs appear only as a *runtime data source* (e.g. a news-agent node
emitting a bias), recorded before it enters a backtest, and only with your
per-session consent.
## A day in the life
1. **You** (in Claude Code, inside `ger40-lab/`): "I suspect the 3rd 15m candle
after GER40 open is long-biased when the first two close bullish — build it as
a signal."
2. **Claude** (via the skills pipeline) writes `nodes/third-candle-long/`,
implements `schema` + `eval` against `aura-core`.
3. **Backtest:** `aura backtest nodes/third-candle-long --symbol GER40
--from 2020 --to 2024` → the strategy produces a broker-independent, unsized
**bias stream** (one signed, bounded `f64 ∈ [-1,+1]` per cycle — sign = direction,
magnitude = optional conviction). A downstream **risk-based executor** (stop-rule →
position-management, in **R**, the protective stop defining 1R) turns the bias into
tracked trades, and the **R-evaluator** integrates the per-trade R-outcomes into an
**R-expectancy / R-curve** — the signal's *quality*, measured account- and
instrument-agnostically in **R** (E[R], SQN), not currency. Optionally compose a
**cost model** — a C9 graph of cost nodes, in R (`net R = gross R cost-in-R`) — to
draw the **net-R** curve beside the gross one. The run yields an R-metrics table + a
run record (manifest + metrics) under `runs/`. (Contract C10.) Money, a real broker,
and a currency curve are a later **live/deploy-edge** concern (the only reliable ground
truth, measured forward — never an authored historical "realistic broker"); the legacy
`SimBroker` pip yardstick survives only as an optional dual readout, not the model.
4. **Sweep / Monte-Carlo / matrix — a Rust experiment.** Anything beyond a
single backtest is an *experiment* in `experiments/` (Rust, builder API): a
parameter sweep, Monte-Carlo over seeds, or a structural matrix like "these 10
strategies × these 3 instruments × {fixed-stop, vol-stop} risk-executors". The
matrix is plain Rust loops, not a config schema (C20). `aura run experiments/compare`
bootstraps the matrix, fans the disjoint sims over all cores (C1), and writes
the comparable runs to `runs/`.
5. **Compose:** "combine it with `momentum-filter` as a weighted sum" → Claude
writes a composite node (fractal, C9).
6. **Walk-forward:** another experiment kind (rolling in-sample optimize +
out-of-sample test) → an out-of-sample verdict.
7. **Freeze:** `aura freeze nodes/strategy-y --out bots/strategy-y` → a standalone,
statically-linked bot (C13); the live broker connection (e.g. cTrader Open API) is
bound at this **deploy edge** — the only place account money appears, measured forward
against a real venue, never an authored historical broker.
8. **Explore — `aura play`.** The playground plays *any* harness and shows what
your **sinks** recorded (C22): live equity/signal streams while a run
executes, and recorded traces + meta-views afterwards — stitched walk-forward
equity, sweep surfaces, multi-strategy comparison. It is a trace explorer, not
a scene editor (the World is a *program*; only sink-recorded data is visible —
no sink, nothing to see). Topology you grow in Rust (hot-reload); runtime
params you tune with sliders (C12).
The real value is not step 3 (one backtest — every quant system does that) but
the **World**: steps 4/6 dynamically construct and orchestrate *families* of
harnesses, and the playground explores those families. The single-harness engine
is the substrate; the World is the product (C20C22).
CLI command names and `Aura.toml` are illustrative; the concrete surface is
designed with the relevant milestone (see the open threads in the design ledger).
The forward-queue — what to try next — lives in the project's Gitea tracker, not
in code (contract C18).