Files
Aura/docs/project-layout.md
T
Brummel 0d7deb3a91 design(C10): reframe strategy output to intent/exposure stream; position table becomes a derived layer
The DAG expresses exactly one state at time t and a node emits at most one record
per eval (C8), so a *sequence* of position events — where one decision instant
(a stop-and-reverse) needs a close AND an open at the same event_ts — cannot be
the DAG's per-cycle output without violating C8. The state the DAG can express
faithfully is the desired exposure (one value per cycle); the buy/sell/close
events are its first difference, a derived consequence.

C10 is reframed accordingly: the strategy's primary, backtestable output is an
intent/exposure stream (one signed, bounded f64 in [-1,+1] per cycle). Signal
quality is measured by the sim-optimal broker integrating exposure*return into a
synthetic pip-equity curve. The broker-independent position-event table survives
as a decoupled, derivable, downstream position-management layer (computed table,
not a per-eval output) feeding realistic broker nodes for viability/deploy — no
longer the DAG output nor the signal-quality measure.

Touches the ledger contract (INDEX.md C10 + provenance/milestone/C20 ancillary),
the always-loaded summary (CLAUDE.md invariant #7), the glossary (broker, equity
stream, position table, realistic broker, signal, sim-optimal broker, strategy
reframed + new exposure-stream entry), and the north-star layout doc. Sealed
specs/plans (0001-0006) left as historical record.

refs #4 #5

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 17:02:33 +02:00

118 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# How aura is used — engine, projects, and a day in the life
This document describes the *outside* of aura: how you sit in front of it and
what a research session looks like. The *inside* (the engine's contracts) is the
design ledger (`docs/design/INDEX.md`).
## Engine vs. project (the game-engine split)
aura is a **game engine for traders**, and like any game engine it is separate
from the things built with it:
- **This repo (`aura`)** is the **engine**: `aura-core` (the shared contract),
`aura-std` (universal standard nodes), `aura-engine` (the deterministic sim
runtime), `aura-cli` (the `aura` binary), and later the egui playground. It
ships at most `examples/` fixture nodes for its own tests — never your real
signals.
- **A research project** is its **own external repo** (e.g. `~/dev/ger40-lab/`),
with its own git history, its own Gitea repo (its own forward-queue), and a
cargo dependency on aura. **It is itself a Rust crate** (a `cdylib` library of
node / strategy / experiment blueprints); the `aura` host loads and runs it
during research (hot-reload), and freezes a chosen strategy + broker into a
standalone binary for deploy. This is where you and Claude author signals *and
experiments* — all in Rust — and where the runs live. (Contracts **C16**, **C20**.)
The `aura` CLI is a tool you run *inside* a project directory — it finds the
project root by walking up to an `Aura.toml`, the way `cargo` finds `Cargo.toml`.
A project is always a Rust program built on the engine.
## A project repo
```
ger40-lab/ # your research project — a separate Rust crate (cdylib)
├── Aura.toml # STATIC context only: data paths, instrument/pip
│ # metadata, default broker & window, runs dir (no logic)
├── Cargo.toml # cdylib; depends on aura-core/aura-std (+ shared node crates)
├── CLAUDE.md # the project's own skills wiring (authoring discipline)
├── .claude/dev-cycle-profile.yml
├── nodes/ # project-local node & strategy blueprints (Rust)
│ └── third-candle-long/
├── experiments/ # experiment/harness definitions (Rust): matrices, sweeps
├── runs/ # the run registry: manifest + metrics per run
└── (frozen bots, …)
```
## Where reusable nodes live (three tiers)
Everything that plugs into the engine is fractally a `Node`. Reuse is plain
cargo, layered by maturity (contract C16):
1. **`aura-std`** — universal blocks shipped with the engine (SMA/ATR/RSI,
resamplers, the `SessionNode`, standard combinators, broker profiles).
2. **Shared node crates** — cross-project-reusable blocks in their own repos
(e.g. `Brummel/aura-nodes-fx`), pulled in as cargo git dependencies.
3. **Project-local `nodes/`** — experimental, project-specific blocks.
Promotion is the ordinary Rust gradient: a node proves itself project-local →
gets extracted into a shared crate → if it turns universal, into `aura-std`.
Shared nodes are `rlib` dependencies; the hot-reload unit stays the project-side
`cdylib` that composes them, so editing a shared node still rebuilds and reloads
the dependent.
## Authoring happens in Claude Code (contract C17)
aura has no built-in coding-LLM. You author by talking to Claude Code, which
writes the Rust — nodes, strategies, *and experiments* — builds it, runs it, and
reports back. Declarative config (`Aura.toml`) holds only static context, never
logic. IONOS LLMs appear only as a *runtime data source* (e.g. a news-agent node
emitting a bias), recorded before it enters a backtest, and only with your
per-session consent.
## A day in the life
1. **You** (in Claude Code, inside `ger40-lab/`): "I suspect the 3rd 15m candle
after GER40 open is long-biased when the first two close bullish — build it as
a signal."
2. **Claude** (via the skills pipeline) writes `nodes/third-candle-long/`,
implements `schema` + `eval` against `aura-core`.
3. **Backtest:** `aura backtest nodes/third-candle-long --symbol GER40
--from 2020 --to 2024` → the strategy produces a broker-independent
**exposure stream** (one bounded signed value per cycle = intent); the default
**sim-optimal broker** integrates `exposure·return` into a synthetic
**pip**-equity — the signal's *quality* — yielding a metrics table
(pip-P&L, max-DD, Sharpe) + a run record (manifest + metrics) under `runs/`.
Brokers are consumer **nodes**: the sim-optimal one reads the exposure stream
directly, while a realistic broker reads the *derived* position-event table —
add `--broker pepperstone` to get a realistic currency curve *alongside* the
sim-optimal pip curve, two comparable equity curves. (Contract C10.)
4. **Sweep / Monte-Carlo / matrix — a Rust experiment.** Anything beyond a
single backtest is an *experiment* in `experiments/` (Rust, builder API): a
parameter sweep, Monte-Carlo over seeds, or a structural matrix like "these 10
strategies × these 3 instruments × {sim-optimal, pepperstone}". The matrix is
plain Rust loops, not a config schema (C20). `aura run experiments/compare`
bootstraps the matrix, fans the disjoint sims over all cores (C1), and writes
the comparable runs to `runs/`.
5. **Compose:** "combine it with `momentum-filter` as a weighted sum" → Claude
writes a composite node (fractal, C9).
6. **Walk-forward:** another experiment kind (rolling in-sample optimize +
out-of-sample test) → an out-of-sample verdict.
7. **Freeze:** `aura freeze nodes/strategy-y --broker pepperstone
--out bots/strategy-y` → a standalone, statically-linked bot (C13).
8. **Explore — `aura play`.** The playground plays *any* harness and shows what
your **sinks** recorded (C22): live equity/signal streams while a run
executes, and recorded traces + meta-views afterwards — stitched walk-forward
equity, sweep surfaces, multi-strategy comparison. It is a trace explorer, not
a scene editor (the World is a *program*; only sink-recorded data is visible —
no sink, nothing to see). Topology you grow in Rust (hot-reload); runtime
params you tune with sliders (C12).
The real value is not step 3 (one backtest — every quant system does that) but
the **World**: steps 4/6 dynamically construct and orchestrate *families* of
harnesses, and the playground explores those families. The single-harness engine
is the substrate; the World is the product (C20C22).
CLI command names and `Aura.toml` are illustrative; the concrete surface is
designed with the relevant milestone (see the open threads in the design ledger).
The forward-queue — what to try next — lives in the project's Gitea tracker, not
in code (contract C18).