Add 'Adaptive Search' (parameter-search cluster)
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
||||
# Adaptive Search
|
||||
|
||||
**Adaptive** (closed-loop) search methods choose each new trial *using the
|
||||
results of earlier trials*. Unlike [grid](Grid-Search) or
|
||||
[random](Random-Search) search — where every trial point is fixed before any
|
||||
evaluation runs — an adaptive method runs a feedback loop: evaluate, learn,
|
||||
propose the next point(s), repeat. [L] This buys **sample efficiency** at the
|
||||
cost of a **sequential dependency chain** (see
|
||||
[evaluation dependency and parallelism](Evaluation-Dependency-and-Parallelism)).
|
||||
|
||||
## Bayesian optimization
|
||||
|
||||
Bayesian optimization fits a cheap *surrogate model* of the objective — most
|
||||
commonly a Gaussian process (kriging) — and uses an *acquisition function* to
|
||||
decide where to sample next, trading off exploration of unknown regions against
|
||||
exploitation of promising ones. [L] Common acquisition functions are *probability
|
||||
of improvement*, *expected improvement*, and *Thompson sampling*. For a current
|
||||
best value $f^{*}$ (minimization), expected improvement scores a candidate $x$ as
|
||||
|
||||
$$\alpha_{\text{EI}}(x) = \mathbb{E}\!\left[\max\!\left(0,\; f^{*} - f(x)\right)\right],$$
|
||||
|
||||
the expected amount by which it would beat the incumbent. [L] Because each
|
||||
evaluation updates the surrogate's posterior, every query depends on all prior
|
||||
results — the method is *sequential by construction*. It is the method of choice
|
||||
when **each evaluation is expensive**, since it aims to minimize the number of
|
||||
queries. [C]
|
||||
|
||||
## Evolutionary and genetic algorithms
|
||||
|
||||
Evolutionary algorithms maintain a *population* of candidate solutions and
|
||||
improve it across **generations**. In each generation the *fitness* of every
|
||||
individual is evaluated; fitter individuals are stochastically *selected*, then
|
||||
combined by *crossover* and perturbed by *mutation* to form the next generation.
|
||||
[L] Each generation is therefore a function of the previous generation's fitness
|
||||
values — the dependency is *generational*. Evolutionary methods make few
|
||||
assumptions about the landscape and handle rugged, discontinuous objectives. [C]
|
||||
|
||||
## CMA-ES
|
||||
|
||||
The *Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy* is a population-based,
|
||||
derivative-free optimizer for **continuous** spaces. It samples candidates from a
|
||||
multivariate normal distribution and, each iteration, adapts that distribution's
|
||||
mean, step size, and *covariance matrix* from the ranking of the candidates — so
|
||||
the search distribution itself learns the local shape of the landscape. [L] It
|
||||
relies only on the *ranking* of candidates, not on objective values or gradients,
|
||||
which makes it robust on ill-conditioned, non-separable problems. [C]
|
||||
|
||||
## The trade-off: efficiency vs dependency, and overfitting
|
||||
|
||||
Adaptive methods typically reach a good optimum in **far fewer evaluations** than
|
||||
random search. [C] Two costs come with the feedback loop:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Limited parallelism.** A dependency chain cannot be fanned out the way
|
||||
independent evaluations can; parallelism is confined to within a batch or
|
||||
generation, separated by synchronization barriers
|
||||
([details](Evaluation-Dependency-and-Parallelism)). [L]
|
||||
2. **Overfitting risk.** An optimizer that aggressively maximizes the *measured*
|
||||
score also fits the *noise* of the particular evaluation data — the harder it
|
||||
optimizes, the more it can curve-fit a sample. [C] The standard mitigation is
|
||||
to score on held-out data; in trading-strategy validation this is
|
||||
[walk forward optimization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walk_forward_optimization)
|
||||
— optimize on an in-sample window, validate on rolling out-of-sample windows.
|
||||
[C]
|
||||
|
||||
A practical corollary: an adaptive method is worth its complexity mainly when
|
||||
evaluations are expensive and a *non-adaptive* baseline has been measured first.
|
||||
[C]
|
||||
|
||||
## Claim legend
|
||||
|
||||
- **[L]** law / exact — a definition, identity, or theorem that does not vary.
|
||||
- **[C]** convention — a practitioner rule of thumb that varies by context.
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- *Bayesian optimization.* Wikipedia.
|
||||
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_optimization>
|
||||
- *Genetic algorithm.* Wikipedia.
|
||||
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_algorithm>
|
||||
- *CMA-ES.* Wikipedia.
|
||||
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMA-ES>
|
||||
- *Walk forward optimization.* Wikipedia.
|
||||
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walk_forward_optimization>
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user